Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Darling defends tax increase blow for whisky industry



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 March 2008
CHANCELLOR Alistair Darling today defended his Budget against complaints that Scotland's whisky industry would be hard hit by the steep rise in duty.
Whisky producers claimed the 55p-a-bottle increase – to be followed by further rises over the next four years – were "punitive". And SNP Finance Minister John Swinney described the move as a "body blow" to a key Scottish industry.

But Mr Darling s
aid increased taxes on alcohol – there was also 4p on a pint of beer, 3p on a litre of cider and 14p on a bottle of wine – had helped him put more money into getting children out of poverty and boosting winter fuel payments for pensioners. He said the UK government had recognised the problems the Scottish whisky industry faced a decade ago. "We froze the duty on spirits for ten years. Very few sectors can say they are in that position."

And he rejected claims the higher duty would be damaging to the industry now. He said: "Most of its production goes to export – it is an extremely successful exporter – and what you pay in duty depends on what the country you are exporting into chooses to charge. That's not going to be affected by what we are doing."

Opposition politicians pointed out Mr Darling had failed to mention Scotland during yesterday's budget speech. But the Chancellor said it was a budget for the whole country. He said: "Scotland will benefit from putting off fuel charges and from the money going to families. Scottish pensioners will benefit from the winter fuel payment. And Scotland will benefit from the overall strategy to keep interest rates and mortgage rates down."

But Mr Swinney said the Chancellor was using whisky as a "cash cow" for an ailing economy.

And he said the duty hike would hit exports because it sent a signal to other countries that whisky was fair game for high taxation. He said: "The signal he has given to other countries is they can exercise punitive taxation on whisky which makes it an obstacle to gaining entry to other markets."

Mr Swinney said whisky was already at a disadvantage compared with other forms of alcohol and called for taxes to be levied according to the alcohol content of drinks. The Scottish Government will get an extra £26 million to spend as a result of spending increases announced in the Budget.

The money comes through the Barnett Formula, the mechanism which gives Scotland a share of public spending rises by Whitehall departments. But it will be for Scottish ministers over the next few weeks to decide how to share the total between departments.

• Mr Darling also insisted today the Scottish Government could not expect to retain £400m a year in council tax benefits from Westminster if it moves to a local income tax.

He said: "Alex Salmond has known from day one, if you don't have a payment to make you cannot get a benefit to compensate for it. But as ever he has tried to bluster his way through this."

The SNP unveiled its 3p local income tax plans earlier this week, but insist they should keep access to the council tax benefit cash.





The full article contains 538 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 March 2008 1:29 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Whisky , The Budget
 
1

The Answer,

Glasgow 13/03/2008 11:11:20
£2.3 billion raised from spirits.

£575 million from whisky

£46 million from scotland whisky drinkers(8% of UK population)





2

heidbanger,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 13:04:15
On the final remark concerning the £400 Million on Council Tax rebate
Did the chancellor not go on to say, tthat as he will not be giving this money to the Scottish Govenment, he will have no reason to collect it and so will bring forward plans to reduce the Scottish Tax bill by that amount?
3

Merouane,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 13:34:42
#2. No of course not. Because this is not about taxes, it's about control and power. Labour in Westminster does not want to allow Holyrood to control how local taxes are generated. If it means Scotland loses out on £400m to satisfy Brown/Darling's desire for control, then that is a price they are willing to pay.
4

bill inch,

EDINBURGH 13/03/2008 13:54:37
#3 No Its the price they are willing for you to pay.
5

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 14:04:43
Labour - a political party working hard to be elected out of power at the next UK general election.

They know that they are finished in Scotland, hence the move by 'Dipstick Darling' to retain £400m a year in council tax benefits.

Why are Labour so afraid of changing the way local authorities are funded? Why don't they have any plans to do something about it other than to allow the status quo to remain?

Don't vote Labour - they stink, there is nothing in this budget which will help the ordinary man/woman in the street. The increase in whisky tax can only lead to job losses and a fall in UK sales.
6

Merouane,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 14:18:19
#4. Well to be fair, we're looking at a UK election taking place before the LIT is likely to come in. I very much hope that Labour will pay the electoral price for this (and so many other things) at that stage.

Of course, the Tories in Westminster will be no better. That's why, in 2011, we must go further towards ending Westminster rule over Scotland.
7

Richard Lionheart,

14/03/2008 10:00:10
What happened to the Global economy all of a sudden?

It’s mainly for export, and won’t be affected by what we're doing??????

Just like the oil producers realised that Gordon Brown was making more out of a barrel of oil than they were. So they turned off the taps to cause a hike in demand.

No wonder Gordon Brown keeps asking David Cameron what he would do; Brown is totally bereft of any competent and workable policies. Cameron has stopped telling him so we end up with Brown’s pitiful excuses and incompetent government.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.