Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cutting travel time worth £40m to the economy

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 October 2008
SPEEDING up journeys between Scotland's two largest cities by 15 minutes would boost the country's economy by more than £40 million a year, a new study shows.
Consultant Atkins claims the benefit to Scottish GDP would be achieved by businesses making Edinburgh-Glasgow journeys saving time and improving productivity.

And the firm has warned the long-term focus for Scotland must be on economic expansio
n along such established transport corridors, rather than being dispersed more widely – a strategy that would help tackle climate change by cutting overall levels of travel.

Atkins came to its conclusions after basing its work on Department for Transport guidance.

The firm concluded that GDP would be boosted by £30m a year from productivity benefits, and by at least £10m a year from business time savings.

Ministers have already said that cutting rail journeys would provide economic benefits of £60m a minute. However, Atkins claimed this was based on the wider impact, not just on businesses.

John Stephens, Atkins director for economics and appraisal, told The Scotsman: "Increasing the opportunity for face-to-face business interactions is good for the economy and especially for smaller firms, but such interactions are dependent on greater mobility."

However, he added: "Over time, an increasing proportion of journeys must be by public transport to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, and the planning system needs to promote denser urban development in order to reduce the need to travel."

Atkins runs Traffic Scotland, the official trunk road traffic information service, and is involved in major projects such as the M74 extension in Glasgow and the city's airport rail link.

The Scottish Government plans to reduce journey times on the main Edinburgh-Glasgow rail line by nearly 15 minutes to 35 minutes through electrifying the route so trains can accelerate faster.

The project, to be completed by 2016, is expected to cost some £265m.

Ministers also plan to upgrade the final "missing link" section of the A8 dual carriageway to complete the M8 between the cities. The seven-mile scheme, just east of Glasgow, is expected to cut four minutes from driving times when it is completed in five years, at a cost of up to £210m. However, the final go-ahead is pending the results of a public inquiry.

Dr Jon Shaw, the director of the Centre for Sustainable Transport at Plymouth University who is an expert on Scottish transport, said spending money on cutting rail rather than road journeys was more cost-effective.

He said: "This kind of economic benefit is extremely welcome news and backs up the decision to electrify the Edinburgh-Glasgow link and speed up journey times.

"The A8 investment is also welcome, but really we need to promote rail journeys between Scotland's principal cities because this is best for the economy as well as the environment."

Shaw added: "New road capacity tends to fill up rather quickly and unless measures are taken to lock in the benefits, we could be back where we started regarding congestion in a short time."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 October 2008 9:22 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

The Strategist,

06/10/2008 00:23:27
Hmmm... Faster Edi/Glasgow rail may help local businesses but higher bandwidth broadband would help businesses everywhere.
2

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 06/10/2008 07:07:40
God point Strategist.
3

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 09:02:23
In comparison to England and Wales, and the vast majority of European nations, Scotland has a poor transport infrastucture.

With the exception of the Glasgow section, the inadequate 2-lane M8 motorway was commenced in the early 1960s and is still incomplete? Likewise, the M74 and M80 have yet to be finished. Complete dualling of the A9 between Perth and Inverness, for both safety and economic reasons, urgently needs to be tackled.

By 2013, Ireland will have completed 638 kilometres of
European standard motorway, and dual carriageway, along with local bypasses and relief roads.

The Republic, with the encouragement of the E.U., is also looking at the long term feasibility of an Irish Sea Tunnel!

Even a joint venture by the tiny Baltic States to build new motorway links to neighbouring EU countries will be completed in 2012.

Scotland, situated on the North-West rim of Europe, urgently needs more investment in transport to get goods to market.
4

Mallory,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 09:05:14
Tele-conferencing and home working would cut down on greenhouse gasses and speed up work even more so why not start there?
5

WJohn,

West Lothian 06/10/2008 09:39:57
I doubt that many business men/women want to start their journeys in Glasgow or Edinburgh city centres or even really want to go into these places.
Improving journey times from other parts of Scotland and even across or around these cities would help more.
"Atkins came to its conclusions after basing its work on Department for Transport guidance."
I suspect that these consultants have come up with the desired answer and are thus assured of more consultancy work.
As for that guff about "face to face business interactions" - the real green solution is to improve video conference facilities. However this is not conducive to good "jolly" participation, the taxi trade or the city centre restaurant trade.
6

Brad,

Glasgow 06/10/2008 11:03:20
Comments here seem to assume that it's this improvement and no others. That's not the case: lots of (welcome) improvements to Scotland's infrastructure are planned and should be delivered over the next 10 years (inc. the M74, M8 completion, airport rail links, etc). More will be announced in the next few weeks when the Strategic Transport Projects Review is announced.

Re: broadband. Virtually everywhere in Scotland should have some access to this. In most urban areas (where the vast majority of the population lives), it's quite good, and more than adequate for the demand. People talk about video-conferencing as an alternative to travel but the research shows that the more you connect with people virtually, the more you want to see them face-to-face...
7

chics311,

sarasota 06/10/2008 13:27:56
As far as I can discern there is no way I can travel from Edinburgh airport to Glasgow city center direct , other than by taxi. At least there should be a shuttle bus from Edinburgh airport to Glasgow airport.
8

geekpie,

forfar 06/10/2008 13:44:55
"he added: "Over time, an increasing proportion of journeys must be by public transport"

At least they got that bit right. Public transport improvements should be paid for by charging for using the M8.
9

Brad,

Glasgow 06/10/2008 17:18:35
#11, you can get a Citylink or Megabus coach service from the end of the airport access road (on the A8). I presume they don't come into the airport because it would cost them too much time and money for too few passengers.

Ask a taxi or an airport bus driver to take you from the terminal. It's about a mile to walk but not especially pleasant.

See citylink.co.uk for timetables (they're pretty frequent). It'll take an hour , maybe a bit less.
10

truthsleuth,

21/10/2008 01:00:38
The best way to improve journey times between Ed and Glas would be to build a High Speed Rail line linking the two cities and their airports.

Complemented by connexion to a high speed link to the South would reduce pressure on runways. relieve pressure on existing rail lines to provide space for improved local passenger services and freight.
So relieving M ways for traffic that sensibly could not go by rail.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.