Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Top Gear presenter denies Clarkson pay rift



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2008
TOP Gear presenter James May has not demanded a similar salary to co-host Jeremy Clarkson, his agent said yesterday.
Several newspapers reported that May and colleague Richard Hammond had refused to sign new contracts for the popular BBC2 motoring show because of the wage dispute.

One reported that Clarkson was paid almost £2m a year by the BBC, while his co
-hosts earned around £350,000 each.

May's representative, Arlington Enterprises, confirmed its client's contract was up for renewal at the end of the month, but said talks with the corporation were at an early stage.

Spokeswoman Annie Sweetbaum said: "We are not looking for parity with Jeremy, but the best deal we can secure for James. But that is never going to be what the BBC first offer."

Hammond's agent was unavailable for comment.

The profiles of May, 45, and Hammond, 38, have increased in recent years with the former branching out in other BBC shows such as Oz And James's Big Wine Adventure, with Oz Clarke.

Hammond gained unwanted notoriety when he nearly died following his high-speed crash at 288mph during filming for Top Gear in September 2006.

It is understood Clarkson, 48, earns considerably more than his fellow presenters because he has a stake in the rights of the series, which regularly attracts audiences of more than eight million viewers. The BBC said it could not comment on specific contract negotiations.

Top Gear's irreverent blend of motoring news, stunts and challenges is also broadcast to numerous countries worldwide and a deal was recently struck to produce an Australian version of the show.

In one newspaper report, a source said: "Internally there is talk that there might be a chance for the first time that there could be a break-up of the team. It has got that bad. There has been a lot of pulling out of hair, a Mexican stand-off. For the first time, it is possible that one or both might leave."

He added: "They don't want to accept second status anymore. There has been a meltdown in negotiations."

The negotiations come at a challenging time for the BBC, which is having to make cuts in key departments to make up for a funding gap left by a less-than-expected licence fee settlement.





The full article contains 389 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2008 8:38 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 06/07/2008 07:06:25
Is that the EBC implying it is not stealing enough television tax from us to pay for its high priced performers and it overpaid executives and news readers?

Why don't they just take advertising (they do enough of it anyway) instead of stealing our money? The iniquitous television tax should be scrapped, and the EBC should be made to compete on the open market.

If anyone wants to keep the EBC, then they should change it to an encrypted subscription service.
2

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 06/07/2008 10:51:29
I am utterly amazed that the lives of so many (8m) people are so blighted of real meaning that they feel compelled to watch the ludicrous Clarkson, May and Hammond.
3

victormeldrew,

06/07/2008 20:24:36
For years I have resented paying for a TV licence. The original ethos of the BBC is no longer relevant, and it should not be allowed to compete with commercial channels producing populist programmes.
The salaries paid to people like Clarkson, Ross and Norton are a disgraceful misuse of PUBLIC funds. [not to mention the army of directors, producers etc.]
4

Bravetart,

06/07/2008 22:09:11
Well my twin boys are 6 1/2 and allowed to stay up to watch Top Gear, I think that is the level it is aimed at anyway. It is just a bit of silly fun and lets face it life is pretty grim at the moment. I would love to do some of their challenges, especially when they were travelling across Europe - I could give May a run for his Captain Slow title.

In my opinion though, May and Hammond are worth more than Clarkson. He is definitely not worth £2m, that is ridiculous, if he wants to walk or be paid a fair salary then let him walk, not the other two.
5

Fanling,

Switzerland 07/07/2008 01:10:17
"...Clarkson was paid almost £2m a year by the BBC, while his co-hosts earned around £350,000 each."

Licence-payers really should be vocally strident about this. There are many more within the BBC being paid unbelievable sums of money for basically turning up for a few hours every week. Clarkson's £2m a year is for doing what, precisely?

As for his girnin £350,000 a year co-hosts, what to say? £350,000 a year is riches beyond most people's wildest dreams and these jumped-up nobodies can't recognise how fortunate they are. What a world.

I get hacked off reading dim journalists' poor recording of stuff like this. Clarkson's co-hosts do not "earn" these princely sums, any more than Premiership footballers "earn" their riches for doing not a lot for 90 minutes a week. Clarkson & Co are grossly overpaid out of the public purse. The public should be worried. But apathy rules as ever.

6

,

11/07/2008 04:31:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.