Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Ofcom chief hints BBC could be forced to share £3bn licence fee



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 July 2008
THE head of the broadcasting watchdog has given a strong indication the BBC might be stripped of part of its licence fee.
Lord Currie, the Ofcom chairman, has questioned one of the BBC's key arguments for keeping its exclusive right to £3bn of taxpayers' money.

The corporation has always argued that sharing the licence fee with other channels would make it difficult
for viewers to know where their money is being spent. As the sole recipient of public money, it claims the BBC has a "unique link" with viewers.

However, Lord Currie said the special relationship was more of "an article of faith" than an "evidenced reality" as many viewers had no idea what the licence fee was used for.

In a speech delivered at London Business School, Lord Currie said the increasing number of the BBC's digital channels and services had created confusion.

The peer made it clear he was so far unimpressed by the corporation's attempts to head off a raid on the levy – and added that research showed many people are unclear about what the £139.50 licence fee is used for.

He said it was an "inconvenient truth" that there "is a sum of £800m over the lifetime of the current licence fee settlement which is not within the BBC's baseline" to help fund the costs of converting all televisions in the UK to receive a digital signal by 2012.

Viewers were not wedded to the idea that the BBC should receive all the licence fee money either, he said, citing research that showed "only 60% (of viewers] believe the licence fee funds the BBC's digital services, 50% its radio services, and only 40% of BBC online". A "significant minority" he added believe it already part pays for ITV and Channel 4.

His remarks follow a concerted attempt by the BBC to defend its sole entitlement to the licence fee, with the corporation arguing it would be bureaucratic to share out the cash with other broadcasters, and confusing for the public.

The attack on the BBC's arguments was coupled with hints of better news for both Channel 4 and ITV.

Channel 4, said Lord Currie, does face financial pressures and "to pretend that there is no problem is wishful thinking". It was Ofcom's clearest hint yet that the broadcaster will get some form of help, through cash or indirect subsidy.

Lord Currie's broadside came as Sir Michael Lyons, chairman of the BBC Trust, mounted a robust defence of the licence fee. He said the BBC contributes £6.5bn to the economy, about twice as much as it receives in licence fee payments.

Lyons, in a speech to the European Union, also claimed that far from the BBC squeezing the commercial sector, it acts as a catalyst for growth and helps it through lean times when rival channels are cutting back.

The BBC Trust estimates that the broadcaster contributes £5bn to the creative wealth of the country and another £1.5bn to the rest of the economy.



The full article contains 512 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 July 2008 9:14 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

,

20/07/2008 01:39:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Guga II,

Rockall 20/07/2008 03:53:06
"many viewers had no idea what the licence fee was used for".

That isn't quite true. We know that vast amounts of it go to pay for over-priced so-called celebrities, and overpaid EBC staff.

It is time that the iniquitous television tax was scrapped, and the EBC made to compete on the open market.

If some people want to keep the EBC, it should be changed to an encrypted subscription channel.

The EBC still treats Scotland as a province, and an insignificant one at that. It is also totally biased towards the Union.

It's all very well for Maggie Broon and his ilk, who claim for their television tax, and their Sky Television subscriptions on their dodgy, lying expenses claims. The rest of us are threatened with the gaol if we refuse to pay for a service which many of us don't want.

The only "unique link" the EBC has with viewers is their ability to demand money with menaces.

3

Boggle fey the Bog,

20/07/2008 18:21:46
I don't have a problem with the license fee, but I do have a problem with it's distribution.

I to would like to see the BBC surrender some of it's license fees, giving the whole amount collected in Scotland, back to Scotland would be a good place to start, and not the very small percentage that does find it's way to BBC Scotland, which of course should be 'decentralise from London Beeb and incorporated as the SBC Trust, under the wachful eye of ScotCom ;-)
4

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 20/07/2008 19:09:04
The licence fee needs to be scrapped not shared out even further! You can guess what will happen next - up goes the fee to support even more hangers-on!

Then the BBC staff and executives can go and find a real job somewhere and earn their living for change.
5

Boy Wonder,

20/07/2008 22:05:31
We might agree to a licence fee if TV execs and "celebrity stars" were not paid huge fees that makes beggars of the rest of us!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.