Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Highest paid BBC stars avoid 10% cuts to salary



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 August 2008
STAR presenters will not be expected to take a 10% pay cut being imposed on lesser-known names in the BBC hierarchy, it was claimed yesterday.
All presenters in national and regional television and radio will be faced with minimum 10% salary cuts when contracts come up for renewal as the corporation attempts to close a £4bn funding deficit.

But the cuts are not thought to extend to the t
op presenters on multi-million pay deals, such as Terry Wogan, Jeremy Clarkson and Jonathan Ross and Graham Norton.

Those facing 10% cuts are thought to include journalists such as Today's John Humphreys and James Naughtie and newsreader Fiona Bruce.

The two-tier cuts strategy has angered BBC unions, which have already threatened strike action this year over the loss of 2,500 jobs. The cuts have been prompted by a less-than-generous licence fee settlement from the Government.

Wages are the biggest bill with the BBC spending £242m on screen and radio talent in 2006/7. Around 40 BBC stars now earn more than £1m.

Clarkson, 48, has negotiated a new Top Gear contract that is expected to earn him £18m. His deal with BBC Worldwide gives him a share of the profits from the station which has 225 million global viewers.

Wogan, a BBC stalwart for more than 40 years, earns £800,000 for five two-hour radio shows a week and 10 Points Of View programmes. He tops that up with £150,000 for presenting the Eurovision Song Contest.

Ross, 47, has an £18m three-year deal for his Friday night chat show, a Film Weekly programme and a two-hour Radio Two show. He also earned £100,000 for hosting the Baftas.

Irish chat show host Norton is on a £2.5m-a-year contract.

The pay cuts come at a time when BBC executives are enjoying six-figure salary rises despite the corporation being fined £400,000 by media watchdog Ofcom after a series of phone-in scandals.

One disgruntled presenter, who declined to be named, said: "This (pay cut] is being imposed by directors who have to take ultimate responsibility for the Ofcom fine. When these directors take a 10% pay cut then maybe some of us will be more willing to agree to belt-tightening."

A BBC source said: "There will be very tough contract negotiations. We have not got enough money and we are facing huge rises in our fuel bills. When contracts come up for renewal they will have to agree to 10% cuts. At least 10%."





The full article contains 435 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 August 2008 8:39 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 03/08/2008 01:35:22
You need to look a little deeper than the basic salaries here. I don't know about Wogan, but Jeremy Clarkson brings in a huge amount of foreign earnings through syndication rights to Top Gear and his other shows. Jonathan Ross probably brings in some outside cash, as would Graham Norton, from the USA and Australia if nowhere else. You may not like their shows, but they are all serious revenue earners for the BBC, which can't really be said about news readers.
2

Evia,

03/08/2008 01:53:45
These people are overpaid. The people doing the real work should be the ones who command big salaries (that rules out politicians. When you consider what our doctors, nurses, fighting forces get, its scandalous.
3

Boy Wonder,

03/08/2008 06:53:27
Yes, these are the top earners and yes, they pull in a lot of viewers worldwide ... but the public would think more of them if they took the cut like the rest of us who face things getting tougher. Why should they be exempt?
4

JG,

Fife 03/08/2008 11:03:21
It's just sheer greed. Can anyone explain why Ross is worth the money he gets? His chat show is averagely OK (his radio show is absolutely dreadful) but hands up anyone who would notice if he left.
5

Jings Crivens,

03/08/2008 13:21:56
its got to be one rule for all, if they want to save money then ditch Clarkson, Ross and co who are not worth their ridiculously high wages. I’m sure they are more talented people out there who give better value for money and would give their right arm for a job at the BBC

While they are at it slash John Humphries wages by at least 50%. as an interviewer he is only interested in getting his own point across and never listens to the interviewee and don’t get me started about him and mastermind

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.