Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Turbine will put the wind up visitors to the Botanics



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 July 2008
VISITORS to the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh are to be greeted by the sight of a wind turbine when the new £16 million John Hope Gateway centre opens next year.
The building, currently under construction, is being designed to be run almost entirely from renewable energy, with a bio-mass boiler and solar panels included in the innovative proposal.

In addition, a wind-turbine will be mounted on top of the c
entre, overlooking the main entrance on Arboretum Place.

Staff said as well as providing energy for the building, the aim of the wind turbine was to spark debate about renewable energy, with visitors able to see how much electricity it generates.

In response to the repeated enquiries from visitors to the garden, developer Xircon has opened a visitors 'chalet', which looks on to the development and includes artists' impressions of the finished building, a scale model and details of ongoing construction work.

Providing a fanfare for yesterday's opening was musician John Sampson, who dressed up as John Hope, the Regius Keeper and King's Botanist from 1761-1786, and the inspiration for the name of the new Gateway centre.

It is due to open to the public next summer.

Builders admitted the innovative design of the building – which is being created using a large amount of sustainable materials – was "a challenge", but insisted the finished development would look "spectacular".

With almost four months to go until completion, the building is still very much under construction, but already the exhibition and restaurant spaces are beginning to take shape.

Mairi Gillies, the curator of exhibitions for the John Hope Gateway, said the new building's ground floor would include a permanent exhibition detailing the work of staff at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, both in the Capital and at other sites around the world.

"There will be two exhibition spaces, and the main space will be a permanent exhibition on the work of the staff here, and at our other sites, which we hope will be very interactive and stimulating for visitors," she said.

"We will also have a temporary exhibition space, which will feature events such as community artists' work, or the work of botanical illustrators."

The Botanics is also hoping to have live links to allow visitors to see staff working in countries such as Belize and China.

Alex Miller, managing director of Xircon, said the John Hope Gateway project was a great example of the kind of sustainable building he felt would soon become far more common.

"The building is using a lot of renewable materials, with the roof beams and floor slats all wooden, and created by high-quality craftsmen," he said.

"The technical innovations within the building, including the wind turbine, bio-mass boiler, solar panels and rainwater collectors, are the kind of things more and more projects will encompass in future, and the Botanic garden is leading the way in that."

Mary Gibby, director of science at the Botanics, said: "The visitors' chalet has been designed to involve the public in our new building before it is finished, to give them in idea of what it will contain, and to keep them up to date with how building work is progressing.

"Once the Gateway is completed it will allow people to learn more about our work across Scotland and at sites around the world."


www.rbge.org.uk



The full article contains 571 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 July 2008 11:33 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Environment
 
1

allknowing,

31/07/2008 12:04:48
Not too strapped for cash then, opposite to what they were saying last year!
2

Unimpressed one,

31/07/2008 12:25:06
Why not go the whole hog and have candle lighting? The botanists at the gardens have jumped in feet first into the great 'climate change' barrel of sh*te. But then who ever listens to botanists unless they rant on about how 'evil' humans are destroying our planet. Pathetic morons.
3

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

31/07/2008 12:33:57
And you sir are pathetically ignorant. These scientists
collect data from a host of experiments which draws a large percentage of them to similar conclusions. Have you
carried out research which proves the converse? Have you published the results? Has it undergone peer review? Do you know how to do these things? do you understand the scientific process. To rubbish Science in this manner is to deny the many benefits which that same Science has brought humanity.
4

Foo,

31/07/2008 13:04:59
#2 Actually that's not a bad idea, candles would lend the botanics a wonderful atmosphere.
5

alex paterson,

edinburgh 31/07/2008 13:23:48
It certainly wont do anything for the look of the place,but if they have money to throw away,good luck.
6

Angus R,

31/07/2008 15:24:22
I thought this story was going to be about Sikhs
7

john z,

edinburgh 31/07/2008 15:41:36
Still could not see what was wrong with the original entrance. The new building is a piggin' eyesore. They took away a beautiful entrance, and built a glorified pre-fab shed. Morons.

For poster 2, Climate change IS a fact on planet earth, and this has been the case since the earth formed. Whether it is man made or not, or even due to carbon emmissions is most certainly NOT a fact. What most environmental campaigners know about the analysis of scientific data, could be written on a postage stamp.
8

john z,

edinburgh 31/07/2008 15:42:13
I meant the comments for poster 3, and not number 2. OOps.
9

Goat Boy,

31/07/2008 16:10:38
Another biomass boiler.

Do we really have enough wood to keep all these things running?
10

Plantagenet,

31/07/2008 23:00:44
9. Plenty of trees in the Botanical Gardens, no? well maybe not.
11

Resolutions,

01/08/2008 00:10:58
#8 Your comments were probably more appropriate for #2!

Many environmental campaigners as you call them, are pretty well read and many are and have been involved in collecting data, so a pretty big stamp required.

As for #2, if they do not know that plants are a fundamental building block of the planet, a stamp is too big - pin head more appropriate.

As this is still under construction, it is understandably a bit of a mess. Should be worth seeing though.
12

Dragonlord,

01/08/2008 10:37:39
It is a fact that the energy used to manufacture wind turbines is never recouped during their life span. Therefore, no matter how bad global warming may be or not be, wind farms are NOT the answer. Scotland is more than selfsifficient in hydro produced power and if they removed the subsidies and increased output to near maximum, there would be no need for these monstrosities.
13

RCro,

Edinburgh 01/08/2008 10:54:40
#12 Dragonlord,01/08/2008 10:37:39 "It is a fact that the energy used to manufacture wind turbines is never recouped during their life span."

This is not a fact, you are either misinformed or a liar.
14

ict,

Edinburgh 01/08/2008 11:11:52
Stand alone turbines with sensible siting will payback their embodied energy in 1-2 years and will pay for themselves financially in less than 10 years (much less for large scale). HOWEVER, the roof mounted ones are essentially useless and don't live up to their claimed power outputs. These small units will just put the public off wind power when they see their failings. Also, the botanics is hardly open, flat terrain which is needed for wind power.
On the other note, biomass is still a cheap and pleantiful source of fuel so hats of to them for that.

Re the whole climate change thing. Global warming or no global warming, have you noticed the price of fossil fuels recently? The global warming argument can take back burner to simple economics, biomass is cheaper than LPG, fuel oil and gas.
15

Unimpressed one,

01/08/2008 13:21:01
h, hello #3, we're talking here about botanists, not climatologists. Botanists are the ones who preferred flower arranging to doing real science. If you are so stupid and can't tell the difference, don't bother to post. Tw*t.
16

K9,

04/08/2008 12:40:12
Re comment 9. Maybe the uninmpressive one could be fed through the turbine and then put into the boimass boiler. Regarding unimpressive comment no. 15, there is clearly a misunderstanding of the scientific process here. Climatologists base their findings on the collation of data from a number of fields including the huge amounts of research done by botanists which extends right back into 19th century, which gives evidence of any broad environmental trends. Its not just a question of looking at the sky and saying its cloudy. I suggest that a botanist is much better placed to comment on climate change than one who has probably derived most of their research from a cursory glance at a tabloid paper.
17

Unimpressed one,

18/10/2008 12:48:17
#16, I could beat you hands down on any scientific area you care to name. However if you think botanists understand climate you are indeed niave.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.