Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Terry Murden: Why it is time for the Nationalists to cut income tax

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 April 2009
SIR Tom Hunter is calling on the Scottish government to use the tartan tax to help stimulate the economy. But while some want a rise in income tax to plug a hole in the public finances, Hunter is in the camp that favours a cut.
Lifting income tax in times of economic hardship would be politically difficult, possibly suicidal, though raising an estimated £350m from an additional 1p on the basic rate would compensate for the shortfall caused by chancellor Alistair Darling's c
ut in Scotland's budget. It would also help maintain public services.

For similar reasons, cutting income tax would be difficult. However, those who believe the public sector to be a bloated burden on economic growth would prefer to see the tax system used to create jobs and enterprises. First Minister Alex Salmond's instinct to protect the vulnerable is uncontestable, but the public sector is now a risk-free refuge for those who might otherwise contribute to a more dynamic Scotland. A tax cut should be accompanied by some brave revenue-raising measures – selling Scottish Water, for instance.

A tax cut that would reconcile the SNP to its other commitment to building a low-cost economy. Cutting income tax in Scotland is also not an option for the main Westminster parties. For Labour and the Tories to instigate a two-tier tax regime would cause outrage throughout England and Wales and for Labour it would contribute to the image of a Cabinet made up of self-serving Scots. For the Nationalists it is time to put this option on the table.

ITV shake-up puts STV back in picture

THE umbilical link that preserves the relationship between STV and ITV brought them a little closer last week through the appointment of Michael Jackson as a non-executive director of the Glasgow based television company. No sooner was the former Channel 4 boss installed on the STV board than he was named as a possible successor to Michael Grade at ITV.

But the two companies share a more pressing concern: the advertising downturn which has foxed executives at all media outlets and prompted some soul-searching about the future.

With revenues down 20% at both STV and ITV1 the drive for other sources of income is being accompanied by some severe cost-cutting and forced STV's top management to take a 20% pay cut to show they are sharing the pain.

Grade's decision to terminate his role as executive chairman of ITV a year early was welcomed by investors, though not forced by them. It had become clear to many, however, that a change was likely.

Grade will stay on as non-executive chairman and hand over his CEO role to a successor once some key regulatory issues are settled. Grade's return to ITV two years ago has produced ratings successes – the X Factor and Britain's Got Talent – and the consensus view is that Grade's ITV was better than the one he inherited. But he did not plan for the recession and the reduction in advertising. Both ITV and STV continue to face the challenge posed by multi-channel television.

ITV's balance sheet is under severe strain. Shares have slumped, reducing the value of the company from more than £4bn before Grade arrived to £1.3bn last week. He tried to bounce ITV into a merger with Channel 4 and Five which backfired. Instead, he axed the dividend along with 600 jobs and announced that £245m would be cut from programme budgets. A rights issue to bolster the balance sheet was binned last week.

Grade's successor will need to decide whether to revive the fund-raising plan but a potential bid from a rival such as Virgin Media lurks on the horizon.

STV's challenges are weighty, but considerably less so. It has cleaned up its balance sheet, sold off most of the unwanted businesses and built a new team around the core television company.

This looked like a risky strategy when launched two years ago and it continues to be a gamble. But chief executive Rob Woodward speaks of a revitalised STV further distancing itself from ITV because he believes the relationship between them is outdated.

STV is also weathering the storm better than its southern cousin and the betting now is on STV becoming the last independent channel three company on the mainland.

That would be one in the eye for all those who thought it was only a matter of time before it fell under ITV's control.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Proximaking,

Dundee 26/04/2009 15:48:10
Tom Hunter doesn't create any jobs, he destroys jobs. He is an importer, a friend of bankers. If he had come along at any other time we would never have heard of him, a chimp with money could have made money over the last 2 decades in this country. Sadly for Tom the public have seen through people like him and quite rightly ask him not to promise to pay to charities, that he sets the agenda for, but to cough up tax on the monies we the public gave him. I remember years ago when the queen was first asked if she'd like to pay tax and how much she would deem acceptable for her to pay. Tom wants that sort of power but sadly Tom those days are gone, put on a pair of trainers and bug off to somewhere else, maybe Connery could put you up while you stash "your" cash and refuse to part with it and so die rich. What was it you always said in the good times Tom? "A man who dies rich dies disgraced", ..... well with attitudes like yours Tom you are weel on your way to being disgraced. Have a read of what this Scottish guy handed free to everyone, handed out to all and sundry completely free of charge, including your precious SNP, some people will not die disgraced Tom, but at this rate you certainly won't be one of them, you look set to become another Connery, a plastic patriot looking to your own bottom line and not the proud heritage of Scotland that was to give, give and give again until the pips squeaked. http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/01/06/crackpot-or-genius-has-a-shell-boffin-stumbled-on-a-scientific-breakthrough/ ........ Incidentally Tom the queen decided to pay £30million tax that first year. I worked out that if I paid the same rate as a percentage of my capital as she had I would have paid less than £30 tax that year, in fact that year I paid £12k tax, do you really want to be like her or Connery Tom? Your life, your choice, as ever. llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.