Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bonuses slashed at Standard Life

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 April 2009
SIR SANDY Crombie, the outgoing chief executive of life and pensions giant Standard Life, has had his bonus cut nearly in half after the group failed to hit performance targets.
Crombie received a bonus for 2008 of £380,000, down 46 per cent on the previous year, according to figures revealed yesterday in the insurer's annual report.

His total package, comprising basic salary, benefits and bonus, fell 15 per cent to £1.39 million from £1.64m in 2007.

Although Standard Life last month reported a small increase in operating profits, its return on "core embedded value" – a key performance measure – fell slightly. A spokeswoman said this affected bonuses for Crombie as well as David Nish, finance director, and Keith Skeoch, chief executive of Standard Life Investments (SLI).

Crombie recently signalled he would leave the business once a successor was found. Both Skeoch and Nish are both in the frame.

The chief executive's level of remuneration saved the business £677,000. Since the resignation of Trevor Matthews, the former head of retail, at the beginning of last year, Crombie has been filling both roles. Matthews received £335,000 in 2008 as part of his severance package.

The spokeswoman said: "There is no reward for failure. You are rewarded on the overall profitability and performance of the business."

Nish saw his 2008 bonus reduced by 37 per cent to £268,000, while the payout to Skeoch fell 32 per cent to £879,000. Nish's overall remuneration fell from £945,000 to £885,000.

Skeoch, who takes a much smaller salary but wins a larger bonus in line with the asset management industry, saw his overall pay fall 23 per cent. In 2007, Skeoch pocketed £1.75m – more than Crombie. In 2008, he made £1.34m.

SLI's total assets under management fell by £12.2bn to £156.8bn at the end of 2008.

Standard Life's non-executive directors received a pay rise. The largest of these was for chairman Gerry Grimstone, whose annual fee went up from £285,000 to £330,000 to "reflect the present day role as chairman of a FTSE 100" company.

The directors' remuneration report said that although actual 2008 total profitability exceeded target set for the year, "a review of the underlying core profits justified reducing the bonuses that would otherwise have been payable to the on-target level".

The reduction in the bonuses comes amid intense public scrutiny of payouts to senior financial sector staff after rising losses on risky debt-backed assets forced leading British banks to seek emergency support from the taxpayer last year.

Standard Life has not accepted any government payouts. When the firm revealed its performance figures last month, a bullish Crombie dismissed fears that Standard Life could be sucked into financial "Armageddon", saying its capital buffer meant the group could survive further dramatic falls in the financial markets.

Standard Life shares closed down 3.8 per cent at 169.6p.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 April 2009 8:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Standard Life
 
1

Forward not Back,

08/04/2009 00:23:36
Wonder when he joins the queue for the soup kitchen?

That said, this is the way the bonus system should work.
2

Glasgow Expat,

Proud Short Seller 08/04/2009 06:08:19
And how much of this compensation is in the form of company shares? For senior managers to take these large bonuses in cash is clearly wrong. Pay them for their performance of course, but pay them so they have a stake in the continued good performance of the business. Pay them shares.
3

Faultserver,

Barbados 08/04/2009 08:20:57
Some of them might not be able to afford to send their kids to Heriots anymore, scheme school beckons.
4

The Sheriff,

08/04/2009 08:42:21
So his bonus was a mere £380k,are we to feel sorry for him?

Far too many folk worry about what bonuses they make instead of getting on with the job in hand and working for a decent salary.If companies paid all employees a decent salary without bonuses the world would be a better place,it's obscene that individuals can get £380k as a bonus yet the scotsman wants us to feel sorry the guy because they year before it was double that.That £380k could employ another 15 staff at standard life to offer a better service rather than line the pockets of a fat cat,don't forget that figure is a bonus on top of his basic salary of double that.
5

gggrumpy,

08/04/2009 10:32:04
Am i missing something here?
A bonus of £380,000 for a year in which Standard Life has lost its policy holders a fortune.

I thought a bonus was for doing something above and beyond what your normal salary was for, i am obviously deluded.
6

Faultserver,

Barbados 08/04/2009 11:15:48
Where do you think most of the money you put into your pension goes?
7

Jaimeson,

08/04/2009 11:29:27
The reason these people have received a bonus is because their performance in RELATIVE terms to other financial outfits is better. Relative performance is of course another scam dreamt up by the City of London and Wall St and used throughout the financial industry to ensure executives receive extra cash regardless of their companies' actual performance. So even in a recession when all companies are losing money they still get a bonus, while Joe Dope with shares in these companies is losing big money. The government when drawing up its new regulations for financial compensation should outlaw relative performance.
8

Capitalistic,

Edin 08/04/2009 11:38:26
What happened to a good old fashion wage. You get paid to do your job and that is it. The first bank/insurance/building society that does this gets my business.
9

Glasgow Expat,

Proud Short Seller 08/04/2009 14:09:56
Well said 7. Relative performance is a joke and has to go.
10

Faultserver,

Barbados 08/04/2009 15:05:30
The whole pensions scam is a joke. The ordinary punter should not be forced to give his money to these crooks.
One of you financial wizards out there let us know what percentage of the money given by people actually goes into investment and how much into fat cats pockets, fancy buildings etc.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.