Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Four out of ten fish caught across the globe are wasted or from at-risk species

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 April 2009
SCOTLAND is contributing to a marine "crisis" in which 40 per cent of fish caught across the world is discarded or comes from unsustainable sources, according to a report.
More than 38 million tonnes of fish caught globally can be defined as by-catch, according to the paper co-authored by conservation charity WWF.

The authors came up with a new definition of by-catch, to include fish from unmanaged stocks, as well a
s those that end up being unused.

It puts levels of by-catch up to five times higher than previous estimates, which have ranged from seven to 27 million tonnes annually.

The report estimated by-catch levels in the north-east Atlantic were as high as 20 per cent due to "extremely high discard rates".

The report, Defining and Estimating Global Marine Fisheries By-catch, said: "Many north-east Atlantic fisheries have extremely high discard rates, particularly from the bottom-trawling fleet, which generates far more by-catch than marketable fish."

WWF Scotland suggested this was due to factors such as use of non-selective fishing gear, market demands and quota limitations.

Amanda Nickson, leader of WWF's By-catch Initiative and co-author of the paper, said: "The health of our oceans cannot be restored or fisheries sustainably managed if 40 per cent of the global catch is unused or unmanaged.

"A huge quantity of fish and marine animals are thrown back into the sea dead or dying. Even if this by-catch is retained, there is no way of telling whether it was sustainable to remove it from the sea in the first place."

Scottish environment secretary Richard Lochhead said Scotland's commitment to tackling the by-catch issue was "unrivalled across Europe". He added: "While any solution to this economic and environmental madness must involve Europe, the Scottish Government, backed by fishermen, conservationists and scientists, stands ready to help find the right solution."

A spokesman for Seafish, which represents the fishing industry, said: "Anything that draws attention to the issue is welcome. No-one in this industry wants to see discards continue. We want to reduce them as much as possible."

He added that stocks of North Sea cod had been increasing since 2004.

"This is proof that conservation measures in Scotland actually work," he said.

Louize Hill, WWF Scotland's marine policy officer, urged ministers to ensure the forthcoming reform of the Common Fisheries Policy addressed the issue of by-catch "as a priority".

She praised the work already being carried out in Scotland, including closures that protect spawning fish and selective gear that allows certain species to escape the nets.





The full article contains 451 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 April 2009 11:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/04/2009 00:51:39
When you add up enough figures like the WWF, it becomes suitably significant and meaningless.

Scots skippers have pioneered and worked conservation minded gear for years and seen the fleet half-way wiped out. Meanwhile nations like Denmark, flying the green flag, have run suction dredgers into our shores.

If all marketable fish was sold, as is done in France, there wouldn't be a bycatch problem.
2

Sierra Foothills Scot,

Diamond Springs 15/04/2009 01:00:15
Scotland is not 'contributing to a marine "crisis" in which 40 per cent of fish caught across the world is discarded or comes from unsustainable sources'.

Did Ms Haworth never hear of the criminal European Union Common Fisheries Policy, which has caused the dumping of perfectably usable by-catch?

This egregious policy has been rigorously enforced against UK fishermen for several years and only now is being "reconsidered".
3

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 15/04/2009 01:49:24
Banks were throwing money into fishing in the 1980s and in this crazy period the grounds were worked very hard with rock-hopping gear. These days are past, yet skippers now have to throw out good fish to make a living from the limited time they're allowed at sea.
4

Scozzy,

Aus 15/04/2009 06:33:36
There's something far wrong in a world where pet cats eat more fish than seals, pigs eat more fish than sharks and battery hens eat more fish than puffins or albatrosses.

Paul Watson from Sea Shepherd endorses a complete ban on commercial fishing before the oceans run dry:

http://tasmaniantimes.com/index.php?/weblog/article/we-need-to-stop-eating-the-oceans/
5

Max F,

15/04/2009 08:19:06
Scotland now has a good record on this issue, but even the industry admits it still has to throw stuff back. So, yes, Scotland is still contributing to this global problem. WWF is right to praise the action taken in Scotland and to press for more to be done here and the rest of Europe.
6

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 15/04/2009 08:29:40
There was never any trouble with marine conservation when Scotland's waters were being policed and regulated by the old Scottish Office. For centuries Scottish fishing was carried on in a harmonious balance between exploitation and conservation. Fishing was never a UK affair until Edward Heath gave the Scottish fisheries away to Brussels in 1973. That was when the disaster began. The Scottish fishers are the last ones who can be blamed for the state of the fishing industry, especially after the industry has been slashed by two thirds for the benefit of other EU member states. I look forward to the day when the entire north-east Atlantic is being conserved and carefully exploited in a partnership between Scotland, Faeroes, Iceland, Norway and Russia. The present Brussels-centred lunacy has to be brought to an end if there is to be any future for the fishing industry and the conservation of marine resources generally.

7

Sean K,

Elgin 15/04/2009 08:46:48
There was no discarding whatsoever by the Scottish fleet before the iniquitous CFP was applied and it enforced its insane discarding rule on the industry. The end result was up to 600,000 tons of fish destroyed each year (by ICES estimates). Scottish skippers and crews wept at this travesty of justice and economic / environmental mismanagement they were forced to comply with. a few who were incensed at the CFP folly landed their discards which were termed blackfish. Fines of up to £ 50,000 stopped that.

The only hope for the fish stocks within Scottish (or UK) 200 mile EEZ waters is complete withdrawal from the CFP, joint local / government management, a total end to all discarding, and other pernicious CFP rules, and a gradual restructuring of the fleet and effort to achieve a balance between that and a sustainable harvest.

The Faeroe Isles has taken such steps in the past ten years with splendid results. why not Scotland ?
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 15/04/2009 08:58:50
The fish thrown back doesn't just disappear - surely it re-enters the marine food chain.
9

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 15/04/2009 09:40:44
#8 gus1940

That is true, but I don't think we should be complacent about its effect. (I'm not suggesting you are).

Large quantities of dead or dying fish introduced into the sea would be expected to boost the numbers of scavengers. If those scavengers also feed on fish eggs then the boost in their numbers could make it more difficult for fish to breed successfully.

That is speculation on my part - I have no knowledge of the reality or extent of this effect (and I don't know if anyone else does) - I mention it to indicate that we need to think of the seas as complex ecologies, where effects of our actions may be serious and unexpected.

An example of these kinds of effects appears to have occurred on the Grand Banks cod fisheries that show little or no sign of recovery many years after commercial fishing ceased when cod stocks crashed. It appears that this may be due to the much reduced cod population allowing the population of crustacea (crabs, shrimps etc) to increase (cod feed on crustacea). The high population of crustacea then feed on any cod eggs that are produced, preventing a recovery in the cod stocks. Thus, by over-fishing cod stocks just for a few years it is possible to get to a situation where the cod numbers can NEVER recover, however long fishing is curtailed.

10

drunken proffet,

Tassy 15/04/2009 10:15:57
There was a loch in Scotland that the herring fleet used to be based. They said that when the fleet was in you could walk from one side to the other on the fishing boats. They improved the nets and techniques since then so there are maybe a lot less boats making a living than in the old days. Ach, blame the French, Danish, Spanish, Dutch or any other guy, we have scientific organisations who tell us we are in the right. Fish breed at a rate that make rodents appear celibate and you still appear to be successfully wiping out individual species. It is only members of the human race who could achieve this totally prodigious accomplishment.
11

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 15/04/2009 11:34:23
One of the more pernicious and almost unknown effects of the EU fisheries policy has been an alteration of the genetic characteristics of the main commercial species as a result of overfishing. The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis researched this over the past year or two, and came to the conclusion that the genetic damage caused in the past 30 years will not right itself by natural means for two or three centuries to come. I am afraid that the ideological lunacy of the EU fisheries policy has already left us a damnable legacy that will be with our grandchildren and theirs for generations to come. See:

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/iiasa35/docs/speakers/speech/ppts/dieckmann.pdf

http://www.iiasa.ac.at/iiasa35/docs/speakers/speech/pdf/Dieckmann_Heino.pdf

12

stevejd,

on the beach catching nowt 15/04/2009 13:29:52
E.U.regulation and commercial fishermen have ruined our seas especially inshore waters such as the forth and clyde estuaries.The only sea life that thrives are prawns due to the lack of natural predators(fish!).The small mesh nets wipe out all young fish and non commercial species vital for a healthy eco system.Our seas should not be dredged clean to meet foreign demand.Why do politicians always prioritise their requirements.The seas belong to everyone,not just the vandals!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.