Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fishing armada 'set to invade North Sea'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 April 2008
CHANGES proposed for European fisheries regulations could allow an "armada" of Spanish trawlers to finally gain access to Scotland's rich traditional fishing grounds, it was claimed last night.
Scottish MEPs warned the prospects of a "fishing free for all" in the North Sea could undermine the principles of the controversial Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) by giving the European Commission the power to reallocate unused national fishing quot
as.

The row erupted after the European Parliament approved new proposals governing the fishing activities of EU and third-country fishing vessels.

The regulations were originally drawn up to deal with the under-utilisation of fishing opportunities by vessels in fishing grounds such as the waters off Greenland and west Africa.

But Scottish MEPs claim that amendments to the regulations, championed by Spanish MEPs, have also effectively given the European Commission the right to transfer unused quotas within EU waters from one member state to another. Two of Scotland's mainstay catches – haddock and mackerel – which are allocated under a joint agreement with Norway, could be particularly at risk, they said.

Struan Stevenson, the Scottish Conservative MEP, said the changes would pave the way for a "new Spanish fishing armada" to enter British waters and allow the Spanish fishing fleet to grab UK quota and displace British fishermen in the North Sea.

He said: "If the proposal is endorsed by the Council of Ministers, the Commission will be able to give any unused fishing quota from one country in the EU to another. Any unused UK quota could be given to Spain or other major fishing nations.

"This is a Trojan Horse as it will give right of access to fishing opportunities previously allocated to other member states."

Mr Stevenson added: "We argued in the debate in the parliament that this would completely undermine the whole credibility of the CFP and the whole pillar of relative stability.

"My fear is that countries like Spain will argue they have track record of fishing in the North Sea and will demand fishing rights."

Catherine Stihler, the Scottish Labour MEP, also condemned the Parliament's decision. She said: "The report was supposed to simplify fishing authorisations but instead has ended up awarding the Commission the right to reallocate fishing quota. To give the Commission carte blanche to reallocate fishing opportunities beggars belief, especially when fishing opportunities are scarcer. We have to ask ourselves if we are facing a fish free-for-all in the North Sea."

PLEDGE TO BLOCK MOVE

GEORGE MacRae, the secretary of the Scottish White Fish Producers' Association, pledged that the fishing industry would take court action to block the changes.

He said: "The Spaniards have long cast greedy, envious eyes at the rich stocks that are available in the North Sea."





The full article contains 463 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 April 2008 11:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 11/04/2008 03:42:05
This highlights the case for Scotland to get out of the CFP as well as the CAP; or, preferably, out of the EU altogether.
2

brian mcc,

the arctic 11/04/2008 04:52:20
Put aside the quest for independence.
The enemy has a drift-net 11 miles long.
International food crisis has set to sea...

Like a vacuum cleaner for the ocean,
a black hole, sucking the life from fresh and salt
If a drift-net is lost at sea,
Fish entrapped are at the mercy of the tides

Wanton waste.
3

The Daleks,

Longmen 11/04/2008 05:17:11
The current state of our seas is an absolute disgrace.

The fish stocks have been plundered to the point of total collapse, and the water itself polluted.

Among other things, what we need is a moratorium on fishing in European waters, until the fish population has a chance to recover.

Fishing is not an essential activity in Europe, we don't depend on it for our survival. Close the fisheries down, and pay the fishermen to do something else for a couple of years whilst the sea gets a well needed break.

We could easily pay the fishermen to stay at home with the billions of Euros we currently pump uselessly into Africa as "aid".
4

,

11/04/2008 08:17:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

yockel,

11/04/2008 08:46:46
#1 Time for a few less British registered boats operating out of foreign ports with foreign crews while we are about it too.

Wonder if the Krauts still have the SMS Panther and could we borrow her for a wee while.
6

Peter,

AM2's Alter Ego 11/04/2008 09:20:40
I suppose this another union benefit to Scotland thanks to Westminster's fisheries minister's ignorance?

Westminster has already flogged £2.5 million of Scotland's Prawn quota on a deal to save white fish fleets in the south, to the Germans.

What has Wendy to say about this?
7

bill-alba,

fife 11/04/2008 11:31:20
Where is high and mighty et al.. I suppose they agree with this measure as we are too stupid and small to look after our own fishing areas..Westminster will never look after the requirements/needs of Scotland if it is in conflict with the requirements/needs of England...time to get our own commissioners and tell Westminster to get lost.
8

sweet76,

11/04/2008 11:42:31
bill-alba :Westminster signed away power of the seas to Europe years ago. I'm unsure how this benefits England as English fishing fleets have suffered the same fate as the Scots', if not worse. Any excuse to blame the English I suppose.
If your looking for salvation in AS, don't hold your breath. He's made it clear on a number of occassions his intention to keep an independant Scotland within the EU.
9

High Speed Now!,

11/04/2008 11:52:40
Disappointing that the Scottish press choose to stir up xenophobia when talking about fishing. Why single out the Spanish and not mention the Danes or the French for example? Thousands of Spanish fishermen have suffered the consequences of EU controls in other parts. Maybe Scots fishermen could learn from their Spanish counterparts who are experts in fishing technology and have been prepared to risk their lives in terrible conditions all over the world. Blame Scottish and English politicians for not negotiating the best deal but don`t attack foreigners just because they do a better job or show more initiative than our own workers.
10

sam the god,

11/04/2008 12:47:07
#9 High Speed Now

The area in question is not a traditional Spanish fishing area, the reason they are moving further a field is the areas they traditionally fish have been over fished by them and now they are going to do it in our areas. The Scottish fishing industry has all but been decommissioned by the EU (not enough fish in the north sea) but low and behold the Spanish can come into our traditional fishing areas and plunder it. The EU should have said that the Scottish fishing fleet can catch them and then SELL them to spain.
11

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 11/04/2008 13:07:10
#1 - your "pull the draw bridge up approach" is the core problem with the nationalists so-called "independence" attitude to life.

Get real, get round the table within the UK context and negotiate properly from the firm perspective of greater longterm interest for fishery stocks for the benefit of the EU as a whole.

Problem is at present the nationalist minister Richard Lockedinhishead is more interested in arguing with the minister with UK wide responsibilities rather than presenting a unified case for the N.Sea - stay focussed you lot?
12

Klaus Dubois,

Ed 11/04/2008 13:15:36
#10, The Grand Banks off Newfoundland has been a traditional fishing ground for the Basques since teh middle ages (before the British/French colonised the place). I suspect they were well aware of the North Sea.

Most arguements here descend to the usual finger pointing - it's the English, it's the Spanish, it was him Mammy, it was him. Stop behaving like a victim & people might respect your opinion.
13

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 11/04/2008 19:53:23
If we supported all traditions where would we be today? Most traditions are the refuge of the mindless, straitjackets worn by the timid and the unimaginitive. And anyone who thinks that an action is justified by tradition is stupid beyond belief. Should Indian widows be thrown on the funeral pyres of their husbands? So it is with Spanish fishermen in the North Sea. If the Spanish are too stupid to conserve their own fish stocks then why should our fishermen, who have protected our stocks to rebuild them, let the Spanish wipe out the stocks that they have paid for? The boats of any EU fishermen that take our quotas, used or unused, should be impounded. And the EU can bloody well burn in the fires of Gehenna.
14

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 11/04/2008 20:53:14
What I would like to see is all those fingers pointing at Scotland and calling us selfish b a s t a r d s for controlling our own territories.

So all you unionist numpties can go take a leap with your share and share alike philosophies because they don't work. All you ever advocate is giving way to next big power that comes along.
15

An Beal Bacht,

11/04/2008 21:06:06
Vote No to UK
Vote No to EU
Vote Aye to Scotland!
16

An Beal Bacht,

11/04/2008 21:14:51
12 - Klaus Dubois, Ed 11/04/2008 13:15:36 wrote:

"#10, The Grand Banks off Newfoundland has been a traditional fishing ground for the Basques since teh middle ages (before the British/French colonised the place). I suspect they were well aware of the North Sea."

http://www.exec.gov.nl.ca/exec/premier/gbanks.htm

The most prolific fish species on the Grand Banks has traditionally been cod but there are also flounder, haddock, ocean perch and hundreds of other species. Portuguese and Basques fishermen fished the Grand Banks as early as the 1400s but it was not until after John Cabot's voyage to the New World in 1497 that knowledge of the Banks and their valuable fishing resources spread throughout Europe. The Banks have been continuously fished since that time by fleets from England, France, Spain, Portugal and later Newfoundland, Canada and the United States.

The number of nations participating in the Grand Banks fishery continued to rise through the 1950s and 1960s, and it soon became evident that more stringent fisheries conservation measures were necessary. By 1977, Canada had declared a 200-mile exclusive economic zone and imposed strict controls on fishing inside this zone. About 10 percent of the Grand Banks, known as the Nose and Tail, are beyond Canada's 200-mile limit. In 1979 the conservation of the northwest Atlantic fish stocks outside the 200-mile limit became the responsibility of The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO).

Despite the conservation measures in place for fisheries on the Grand Banks, several species have declined drastically in recent years. By 1995, all major cod and flounder fisheries on the Grand Banks were closed and many other fish species such as turbot and ocean perch have had their catch levels sharply restricted.
17

Alec M,

Falkirk 11/04/2008 23:30:14
#16 -and, of course, this was about the same time that tiny (mighty?) Iceland was resisting British attempts to thwart its claim to extend its territorial waters to 200 miles; more or less when the Heath/Tory government was selling out Scotland's fishing industry in exchange for putative gains for England - sorry, that should read "the rest of the UK".

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.