Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fishermen scorn UK Marine Bill



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 June 2008
SCOTTISH fishermen's leaders yesterday called for the fishing industry to join the North Sea oil and gas sector in being excluded from the controls of the government's controversial new Marine Bill.
In a hard-hitting response to the Westminster consultation document, senior officials in the Scottish White Fish Producers' Association (SWFPA), claim that the fishing industry will be forced to play second fiddle to environmental concerns under the
proposed legislation.

They claim the Marine Bill will offer nothing to commercial fishing interests but more regulation, controls, restrictions and potential elimination. And the leaders add: "The bill is totally geared towards the environmental perspective."

The accusation is made in the joint response by Michael Park, the executive chairman of the SWFPA, and George MacRae, the association's secretary.

The officials argue that there is a "compelling case" for the control of the marine environment out to 200 miles from Scotland's coast to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament – a call already made by the SNP.

The Marine Bill, however, proposes the creation of a Marine Management Organisation (MMO) to take over the management of Britain's coastal waters.

The officials state: "While it is accepted in an ideal world, so far as Westminster is concerned, that the management of the marine environment around the UK from the coastline out to 200 nautical miles should be as uniform as possible, that cannot happen due to the devolution settlement, the unique nature of Scotland's coastline and the size of the Scottish fish-catching capacity.

"The SWFPA alone represents, by value, 50 per cent of the total value of white fish and shellfish landed into the UK. Fishing is also ten times more important to the economy of Scotland than that of England, and there is accordingly a compelling argument for the devolution to Scotland of the control and management of the marine environment around Scotland's coasts out to 200 nautical miles."

Mr Park and Mr MacRae also claim that the Marine Bill is "unfairly biased" towards environmental concerns.

They state: "Overall, the Marine Bill clearly emphasises the environmental principles must be paramount for the future use of our seas around the UK coasts, but offers nothing for existing users, other than more regulation, control, restriction, closure or even elimination, as the bill is totally geared to the environmentalist perspective.

"The view of our association is clear. The fishing industry should, like the oil and gas industry, be exempted from the provisions of the Marine Bill," said Mr Park and Mr MacRae.

"This view is based on the long history of commercial fishing, which has enhanced the marine environment in many ways, and the legitimate expectations of the industry to operate commercially to harvest a national resource in the public interest," they said.



The full article contains 462 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 June 2008 10:12 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sea fishing industry
 
1

Highland Mighty,

18/06/2008 00:10:05
They claim the Marine Bill will offer nothing to commercial fishing interests but more regulation, controls, restrictions and potential elimination. And the leaders add: "The bill is totally geared towards the environmental perspective."


Well 'no fish' equals 'no fishing industry', idiots!
2

frank mcbride,

lusitania 18/06/2008 00:25:49
#1, Highland Mighty.

You make an interesting point but, what do we do with all these "environmentally protected" fish when there's no fishing industry?

Just wondering. Are we all to become vegans? Oh, I forgot, there's no "environmental protection" for land catch................yet!!!
3

Rob - Honest Toun,

18/06/2008 00:27:28
#1

In the words o a kenspeckle Fisherman's Association President tae an equally kenspeckle MEP in Brussels,

" A think ye ken as muckle about seine net fishin as ma erse kens aboot snipe shootin."
4

brian mcc,

the arctic 18/06/2008 01:06:27
What strikes me about this article is that the oil & gas exploration business is exempt.

Goes to show what is more important to London
5

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 18/06/2008 05:13:50
SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE will put an end of the british colonials of this world. Think what lives 250 Miles off Rockall. It rimes ------OIL!
SCOTLAND you are going to be the RICHEST NATION on this earth!God Bless You!
6

Pilrig.,

Livingston 18/06/2008 05:43:29
1 - an office wallah writes...
7

catgut,

philipinodeckie 18/06/2008 05:49:08
who wants to save an industry that uses more fuel than the value of its catches?
is it true that skippers are paying £11 a day to their foreign slave workers? thats 50p an hour.

#4 i think to-days fishermen could do with knowing about the seine net. catching fish with a trawl is no longer an option.
8

Guga II,

Rockall 18/06/2008 09:10:34
#1 Highland Blight.

Why do you insist on buying into matters which are not really your concern, or within your very limited knowledge of Scotland? Why don't you go and vent your spleen in one of the English newspapers?


9

Marian,

18/06/2008 09:14:43
An SNP amendment to the European Union (Amendment) Bill that would return responsibility for fisheries and marine conservation to Scotland's control, was defeated recently after a debate in the House of Commons. The amendment secured the cross-party backing of 175 MPs.

The UK Government agreed to the Lisbon Treaty without seeking any changes to the text which enshrines fisheries in the EU Reform Treaty as an ‘exclusive competence’. However national control of fisheries is a ‘red line’ issue for the Scottish Government.

SNP Westminster leader, Angus Robertson MP, who is a member of the European Scrutiny Committee, said:

“Labour MPs have added insult to injury by voting against the restoration of national control, and fishing communities will be outraged.

“This was an opportunity to ditch the disastrous CFP, but, as usual, Labour failed to stand up for the national interest and safeguard the future of one of our oldest and greatest industries.

“First Gordon Brown failed to ensure that fisheries was a red line issue when the Lisbon Treaty was negotiated, and now Labour MPs have shown that the Westminster Government still views fishing as ‘expendable’ just as the Heath Government did in 1970.

“Thank goodness in Scotland we have a Fisheries Secretary in Richard Lochhead who has worked without fear or favour over the last year to secure the best deal for Scottish fishing in a generation within the limitation of the CFP.

“The Scottish Government’s action shows how we can secure a sound and sustainable future for fishing, but essential to that future remains ditching the discredited CFP.

Commenting on the Liberal Democrats abstention from the vote, and in particular the absence of Alistair Carmichael MP, the Liberal Democrats spokesperson on Scotland, who has in the past been a vocal opponent of the CFP, Mr Robertson said:

“Given the Liberals shenanigans earlier in the day, it is hardly surprising that they failed to keep faith with th
10

Marian,

18/06/2008 09:17:52
The four members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) – Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein – can trade with EU members as freely as EU members can trade with each other. But they retain their independence, pay only a token contribution to the EU budget (as against the UK's £13.9 billion per year) and can avoid insane schemes like the Common Fisheries Policy. They also don't have to watch their natural resources decimated by being turned into a "common European resource" – the desire to protect their fish stocks from this fate is one of the main reasons Norway has stayed out of the EU and its Common Fisheries Policy. And they can trade as freely with the rest of the world as they like. Not surprisingly this has led to their being more prosperous than EU members, even if one only compares them to the 15 Western European countries that belonged to the EU before the 2004 enlargement. What's more, these four countries export twice as much per capita to the EU from outside it as UK does from within the EU. So much for membership being essential for our trade interests.
11

bythesea,

18/06/2008 10:02:14
According to the commercial sector " .... commercial fishing, which has enhanced the marine environment in many ways, and the legitimate expectations of the industry to operate commercially to harvest a national resource in the public interest,"

Enhanced the marine environment - by wiping out 20 species of fish which were once common all round the coast of Scotland; destroying huge areas of the marine environment by trawling; on the west coast using mesh sizes which ensure the death of millions of 'uneconomic' species etc etc etc - no wonder they are frightened of the environmentalist perspective.

They claim to harvest a resource in the public interest - but don't like it when THE PUBLIC demand they do it in a more sustainable fashion.

The CFP is a nonsense but commercial fisheries management and practices wiped out many species before the CFP existed.

As for value - the UK lawnmower industry is worth more than the UK fishing industry - no subsidies, special allowances, 'red fuel', etc etc for them.

www.ssacn.org
12

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 18/06/2008 10:20:19
#11. I entirely agree. An independent Scotland should remain a member of the EEA and should rejoin the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). There are also larger developments afoot in Europe that underline the lack of any necessity for membership of the European Union, which is essentially a political organisation with global ambitions.

It is sheer nonsense to state that Scotland must be within the EU in order to safeguard its trade with continental Europe. The EEA gives it the same degree of access to the European market without the millstones of the CFP and CAP round its neck. That is particularly important for countries like Scotland and Norway, where the geo-economic and geo-political realities are vastly different from those of landlocked central and eastern continental states.

Look at any physical map of Scotland, with settlements largely in narrow glens and islands, and along the coastline, firths and fjords. Scotland is a detached part of Scandinavia. Contrast that with England, where communications radiate out in all directions. England is a detached part of continental Europe, with very different geo-economic and geo-political parameters. The two countries should never have been brought under one political system, and in respect of European integration that same dreadful error must be avoided at all costs.

13

Rob - Honest Toun,

18/06/2008 11:13:08
#8

"#4 i think to-days fishermen could do with knowing about the seine net. catching fish with a trawl is no longer an option."

Seine net fishin is juist anither wey o trawlin excep that it trawls raips alang the sea bed in front o the net tae steer the fish up intae it.

Like the man said - "Snipe shootin!"
14

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 18/06/2008 11:29:17
I think Highland Mighty clearly states attitude and understanding of the Unionist Parties to Scottish Fishing.

They know F~ck all about it and the care F#ck all about it. It will not affect their people, votes or lives when whole coastal communities are wiped out.

How quick they dispose of our natural resources to other EU fishermen who are not restricted by our new labour obsession with Regulation, Regulation, Regulation.
15

Iain's,

Barcelona 18/06/2008 13:16:06
No matter what you do, we in Spain will take all your fish and more!
16

Neal! Whit? Haud yer Whisht!!,

18/06/2008 14:10:59
Er, being English, as some of you know, I don't aleways understand colloquial Scottish.

So, a dinnae ken tha word 'kenspeckle', can anyone explain?
17

Rob - Honest Toun,

18/06/2008 15:11:19
#18

"So, a dinnae ken tha word 'kenspeckle', can anyone explain?"

Kenspeckle juist means "weel kent".
18

gloop,

18/06/2008 15:51:11
Sturgeon 'knew of C.diff deaths'

Nicola Sturgeon

Scotland's health secretary knew of several deaths from a hospital bug four days before an expert team met to control the outbreak.

Nicola Sturgeon will make a statement to parliament on the C.diff outbreak.

She is expected to address calls for an independent inquiry to take place
19

Miss H,

18/06/2008 18:41:41
Highland Mighty you have given yourself away as someone who has no idea what he is talking about.

Not Highland. Not Mighty.

You would not find a single Scottish politician who would agree with what you say whether unionist or nationalist.

You really are an idiot.
20

catgut,

philipinodeckie 18/06/2008 19:40:49
#14
o rab you forgot the seine net only works on clean bottom. The fuel costs are a fraction of trawling and the bottom damage a lot less.
21

LEAL,

18/06/2008 21:28:51
The only reason the CFP isnt in the interests of Scottish fishermen is because the London,England government gave away the fishing industry in order to secure favourable concessions for the city of London.
After independence the Scottish government will renegotiate a fair deal which will allow our fishing industry to flourish.Scotland will be able to do very well outwith the EU,so we have a very strong hand in the European context.The Scottish people will decide whether we stay in the EU or not and the fishery policy will have to be considered along with all other EU policies when the Scottish people decide whether or not they will remain in the EU.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.