Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Landmark power station gets ready for lights out

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 August 2007
A LANDMARK power station in the heart of Edinburgh's financial district is to be demolished and replaced in a £50 million project to provide more electricity for the city.
Under the plans, the ageing substation, near ScottishPower's Dewar Place headquarters, will be replaced with a brand new facility designed to meet the growing energy needs of the city centre.

The move will see the 50-year-old facility - which is
lit up at night in ScottishPower's corporate colours of green and purple - demolished with the site either landscaped or sold to developers.

The new substation will be built in a former workshop building at the firm's headquarters, which will be specially modified to house the equipment.

The scheme is understood to have been based on similar facilities in Japan, where basement offices have modified to contain new power generators to supply power for major cities such as Tokyo.

A ScottishPower spokesman said that the move would "completely modernise" Edinburgh's power supplies.

He said: "Although it has served the city well over the years, it is in desperate need of refurbishment.

"At the moment, it is a bit of an eyesore site that will eventually be replaced with something far better that will reflect the area's status as a gateway to Edinburgh.

"With all of the new developments in the financial district and the new flats and offices being built in Fountainbridge, we need to supply more power to this part of the city and this new station will be able to do that.

"It is state-of-the-art equipment that we are spending a lot of money on and it will improve the electricity supply in Edinburgh for the next 100 years."

The scheme has already won the backing of city planning officials, who said that the new facility would benefit the whole city and remove an unsightly, exposed power station from the financial district.

In a report to councillors, the city's head of planning and strategy Alan Henderson said: "The new apparatus will be reduced in size and will be smaller and less noisy than the existing facility, so the impact on local amenity will be improved."

In 1997, the substation won an Environmental Regeneration Award from Scottish Natural Heritage and Scottish Enterprise, who praised the energy firm for turning it "from a purely functional facility into something which is a substantial piece of public art".

In the late 1990s it won two awards for its floodlit design.

But Roy Durie, a director with city property agents Ryden, said that the new facility would be "hugely beneficial" to the city.

He added: "This site is a bit of an eyesore, so it will be great for the area to see it tidied up.

"The new substation is going to provide more power to cope with all of the new developments in and around the city centre, so this will be hugely beneficial for Edinburgh."

The plans are expected to be approved by councillors at a meeting tomorrow.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 August 2007 9:56 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: ScottishPower
 
1

Cappo Del Monte,

28/08/2007 11:23:50

Dear E News
I would like to point out that a POWER STATION and a sub station are 2 completly different things.

Try and get your titles RIGHT

2

Sarcasm,

28/08/2007 11:30:24

"..demolished with the site either landscaped or sold to developers.

That'll be a long debate then.

3

Road Raga,

28/08/2007 11:37:24

What is really sad about this is that the transformers will be bought from Japan.
Up until a few years ago we had a first class engineering company Bruce Peebles who could have built them right here in Edinburgh.

Like everything else made in the UK, this 100 year old Edinburgh company was the victim of corporate greed - bought by a German company (for the designs etc) then closed and the work shipped to China or where ever there is cheap labour.

4

no-name,

Dewar Place 28/08/2007 11:53:16

I think Mr Mather needs to visit Dewar Place.
That is not Scottish Power's headquarters' building! it's almost derelict.

5

Cappo Del Monte,

28/08/2007 11:57:20

#3
Peebles was origionally bought by an Austrian company, who were later bought by Siemens.
All the equipment was shipped to a factory in india ( yes for cheap labour purposes)
Peebles still has a design office in Leith numbering approx 30 as the austrians / germans cant design a lot of peebles old work.
The transformers will come from either Germany, Austria/ India or China as you predict.
Peebles was shut because the Austrians could shut the edinburgh plant because the government wouldnt back them, and they complied with EU laws. While the austrians and other EU contries prevent manufacturing companies being bought over/shut down

6

Road Raga,

28/08/2007 12:23:19

#5 thanks for the clarification.

It was a sad day when this company was closed, my mum and older brother worked for them many years ago, they had a good training scheme and shipped machinery all over the world.

As you say, it was so easy to close the Edinburgh plant as there was very little objection or interest from local MPs, Councillors etc. All those highly skilled jobs gone !

7

Arthur,

28/08/2007 12:41:02

I don't doubt the history as presented in 3) and 5) but
perhaps these knowledgeable contributers could clarify
whether the site was gutted by fire before or after
Bruce (later Parsons) peebles occupied it?

8

Name,

28/08/2007 13:48:54

Good ridence to that eye sore.

Maybe they'll make a tram stop there...

9

Road Raga,

28/08/2007 14:50:34

#7 Arthur, the site at Pilton was damaged by fire in 1999. They moved to a new site in Leith shortly after, at a considerable cost. Despite being a brand new state of the art facility, this did not save it.

10

Herb Aishus,

Border 28/08/2007 15:02:55

#1 and #4 this seems to be the standard achieved by this 'journo'. His tales are invariably riddled with inaccuracies. A product of the "if you don't know, just make it up" school of journalism???

11

spindona,

gloucetershire 28/08/2007 18:56:00

I started work in that building in 1950 so it is with some regret that I hear it is to be demolished. It may interest others to know that many years prior to that I used to look through the iron mesh widows to watch the boilers being stoked with coal to keep the turbines turning. In those days it was owned and operated by Edinburgh Corporation Electricity Department, its main purpose being to add to the electricty supply to power - wait for it - THE TRAMS. By the time it was decided to scrap the trams in the City, it meant a loss of revenue to the (by this time) Nationalised Electricty Board, of some £87,000 per annum. A massive 'sales' campaign was then undertaken, as thousands of consumers in Edinburgh had equipment which was powered by Direct Current. All of them had to be converted to Alternating Current gear, and I spent months thumbing through Meter Reading books, identifying which businesses would have to be visited to advise them of these dramatic changes. Needless to say, as this was a Government -initiated Scheme, compensation was paid for the purchase of new AC equipment. The Gaumont Cinema now long gone, was adjacent to the Dewar Place building, so when one finished work it was a simple matter to slide into 'fantasy land' by opting to watch the latest Hollywood offering. How many posters remember Johnny Crandles sweet shop opposite the Electricity offices which ensured a pleasant 'moothfy' whilst watching the latest Hollywood blockbuster? We had a fire escape at the side of the building and as a special concession if the Royal Train was pulling out of Caledonian Station, all the wee lassies in the office were allowed to line the steps of the escape to see ? goodness knows what. Nevertheless they cheered as the train went by, more I suspect for the few moments of relief from the boring jobs which most of us had to endure - or should I say EnDEWAR?

12

Lynn,

Madison, WIsconsin, USA 28/08/2007 21:13:51

"where basement offices have modified " Can anyone say "Proofreader"? What is it with this paper? Is it just too bloody cheap to hire someone to do proper proofreading to catch mistakes as simple as this? That sentence should read "where basement offices have BEEN modified". How hard is it to catch mistakes like that?!?!?!? I mean, DUH!!!!!

13

Road Raga,

29/08/2007 07:29:01

nice bit of nostalga #11


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.