Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Quango accused of feather-bedding as laid-off staff get six times base rate

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 October 2009
SCOTLAND's main jobs agency was accused of "feather-bedding" last night, after terms of a multi-million-pound severance deal for staff were published.
It emerged that Scottish Enterprise spent £41 million over the past four years paying off 350 employees, at an average cost per person of £115,000.

The jobs agency offered applicants over the age of 40 lump sums equivalent to two months' salary for every year served – almost six times statutory rates.

Members of staff who took redundancy over the age of 50 were also able to begin claiming their pensions immediately.

Critics of the agency said last night that the deals were far in excess of similar redundancy deals being offered to thousands of staff in the private sector. But Scottish Enterprise defended the pay-outs as "in line with most public-sector organisations" and they were contractually obliged to pay out.

Under statutory rates, employees aged over 40 are entitled to 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year of service, while those under 40 get just a week per year.

The redundancy packages have been offered over the past few years as part of a major restructuring, as the agency has been reduced in size by the Scottish Government. So far, 350 staff have left, in an effort to cut costs.

With running costs reduced, Scottish Enterprise says it will recoup all the money spent on severance deals within two years.

But MSPs from all parties yesterday questioned the size of the pay-outs. Under the terms of the scheme, an employee aged over 40, earning £50,000 a year, with ten years' service at the quango, would have received a redundancy pay-out of £83,000. If 50, the employee would also have been able to start claiming a "gold-plated" pension as well.

Staff under 40 were offered one month's salary for every year served, capped at a maximum of two years' gross salary.

Scottish Conservative deputy leader Murdo Fraser said last night: "This is a very good example of the kind of feather-bedding of the public sector we are seeing now. The average public-sector salary is now higher than in the private sector. You would expect that, at a time when the private sector is suffering a very serious recession, that there would be more rigour applied."

Mr Fraser went on: "Scottish Enterprise has been given money to spend on economic regeneration and supporting Scottish businesses. This money is not designed to be splashed out on substantial pay-offs for highly paid ex-members of staff."

Beneficiaries of the scheme include former board member John Philips, whose severance package came to £390,000.

The agency said last night that, from next year, staff must be 55 before they are able to claim early retirement packages.

A spokeswoman added: "Scottish Enterprise has a contractual redundancy payment policy, which is in line with most other public-sector organisations. Payments are based on the age and length of service of employees. The policy also includes an early retirement facility for staff nearing retirement, rather than an enhanced severance payment.

"We remain committed to helping to deliver the objectives of the Scottish Government's economic strategy, and over the past year this has seen us reduce our management expenditure on a like-for-like basis by £17m."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 October 2009 11:42 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish Enterprise
 
1

Jose Hartley,

Loud Cuckoo Land 15/10/2009 01:40:31
I'm only surprised that SE staff aren't being vigorously (and lucratively) head-hunted by ambitious private sector firms before they have a chance to apply for these measly sums.
2

pitpony,

musselburgh 15/10/2009 05:45:14
when you get greed at the top of the public sector it filters down to the rest.MP,S have started the ball rolling and it is time the public sector was brought to a stop.£200k a year for the top person your not right in the head if you think these people are worth this amount of money?
3

Russell M,

Stirling 15/10/2009 07:03:53
The lessons of the Darien Scheme and its aftermath. Such a parcel of rogues in a nation! The high cost of keeping entrepreneurial Scots in the Unionist camp?
How can I accuse Scottish Enterprise of being pro UK you ask. Any behaviour that keeps Scotland on its financial knees does not further independence.
Now, where did we mislay that statute on Treason?
4

Robert Mason,

Larkhall 15/10/2009 07:28:05
So much for Salmond's "bonfire of the quangos". More SNP duplicity.
5

Samcafe,

Glasgow 15/10/2009 07:49:59
Oh what a pile of it, that total will undoubtedly be to meet contractual obligations including pension uplifts. Denying people those agreed severences at a time when they are being made redundent would only end up costing three or four times as much feeding rapacious lawyers. As for the reporting, the use of an average number is clearly designed to cause a gnashing of teeth. I would like to know what the mode average was - but of course that may not have given the Scotsman its opportunity to manipulate and kick out.
6

Old Cartha Boy,

15/10/2009 08:58:57
Given that SE was previously known as the SDA - Strathclyde Development Agency - it seems that some things never change over the years!

7

Ben Thehoose,

15/10/2009 09:06:44
Under the Tartan Taliban things can only get more 'generous'.
8

JimC,

Kilmarnock 15/10/2009 09:26:10
Under the Tartan Taliban things can only get more 'generous'.

Unfortunately, it was Labour that were in power when these contracts of employment were negotiated. It is the SNP that are trying to cut them down to size.
9

hubris,

15/10/2009 09:37:52
The scandal is that these quangoes achieve very little at great public expense and are virtually unaccountable and uncontrollable.
I would trust Alex to get value for money before any of the others.
That is what is happening
10

Rob, Edin,

Sunny Leith 15/10/2009 09:54:48
Would MURDO FRASER care to inform us all where he got the figures to back up his claim that the average public sector wage is higher than the average private sector.That is IF he has figures or is he just making it up to boost his argument.
The public sector is notoriously low paid. However that is balanced by reasonable working conditions a pension based on 1/80th of final salary for every year worked, which is not as much as some people think given the low salary and job security. Having worked for low pay it is only proper that any redundancy should be based on a higher multiplier than the private sector. How much do MP's get as a severance package?
11

Gdgy,

15/10/2009 10:24:44
Talk is easy, delivery is difficult.

If the SNP had thought before making these claims then they would have known how much it would cost to remove all of these jobs (employment law is pretty stringent) BUT (as usual)they didn't.....
Much easier to make sweeping "promises" then not deliver...they know that their supporters (the SNPites)won't criticise them because they have the "true" faith AND the vast majority don't understand or care.....
12

Walter Ego,

Durness 15/10/2009 10:40:48
4 Robert Mason

Absolutely correct. The only things that are being burnt by the SNP are taxpayers' fingers. Disgraceful.
13

NittonLover,

Newtongrange 15/10/2009 10:51:23
#13 - Why didn't you read #9 before making an ill informed statement. Its Labours fault, as usual.

Also, good to see the Scotman read the Herald - this was front page on yesterdays paper.

If you want to know the real scandal, get this weeks Private Eye and read the time bomb we have regarding PFI/PPP. We are going to have well maintained empty schools and hospitals because cuts will be made to staff while money will have to be paid for PFI contracts.
14

,

15/10/2009 11:19:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

Monstro,

15/10/2009 12:02:38
#15 This will be the private sector that has brought the world to its knees, is still demanding more shore up cash from the UK taxpayer, while it promotes excess and a bonus culture in its own little world of greed and corruption? I think that you will find that Scottish public sector finances are a drop in the ocean compared to what is going on (and apparently unregulated) in the private world. I agree that the public sector needs tightened up at the highest level, but 90% of these people are hard working public servants on minimal and invaribaly below market rate wages! They have the same employment rights as most other people and why not?
16

ken 17,

kirkintilloch UK 15/10/2009 13:06:42
read the article and think, staff under 40, one month per year to a max of 2 years salary, subtract 24 from 40 and that leaves under 16, how many people started work with SE/SDA at under 16, answers please on a postcard, a good deal if you can find this mythical person.
17

AIasdair,

15/10/2009 19:47:57
#6, Shoogles - Joe, why are you pretending to be from Leith, you lying weirdo?

Also, where did this insecure hatred of all things weegie spring from?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.