Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Forced out of business by his bank, one man's bitter tale

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 June 2009
HARRY Lynch's company had survived two previous recessions. It was surviving this one, winning the daily battle for survival amid the cataclysmic downturn precipitated by the reckless actions of a few bankers.
After 30 years in business, the Broxburn-based engineering services firm had a strong order book. It had considered redundancies, but decided to stick by its staff.

Then one of his key customers fell into administration and defaulted on a debt. As most businesses would, Lynch turned to his bank to help keep his firm afloat.

But Bank of Scotland refused to grant extra funding to the £1.5 million turnover business. As a result, Harry Lynch & Co, now unable to meet its own debts, was forced into liquidation, with the loss of 21 jobs.

Lynch's story is not unique. Across Scotland, businesses, regarded until now as rock solid, are having similar experiences.

And last night business leaders warned that Lynch's case proved their claim that financial institutions were failing to pass on the benefits of emergency government funding schemes to boost lending to small firms.

Harry Lynch & Co had fallen into difficulties late last year after a key client – developer MCA Homes – was taken into the hands of administrator Zolfo Cooper, ironically at the behest of Bank of Scotland.

The housebuilder, for which Lynch had carried out roads and drainage work for a development of flats in Livingston, owed the company £97,000.

Lynch had a £50,000 secured loan with Bank of Scotland, taken out in 2004. He had kept up with repayments, reducing the figure to around £40,000 by the time of MCA's liquidation.

He first approached Bank of Scotland, his banker of five years, immediately after MCA Homes collapsed in November.

Lynch, 61, explained: "I asked them for some short-term funding of £50,000 to help our cash flow while the business recovered from the hit we took from MCA Homes' administration, but they said no."

Lynch, who claims that at the time of his company's collapse, he had an order book for two months' work, tried to trade through the problem.

In January, when the UK government's Enterprise Finance Guarantee Scheme was announced. He thought he had been handed a lifeline and approached the bank again.

He said: "At that point, we were not desperate for the money – but I was told then that it was too early – that they (the bank] had not started using the scheme."

Two months later, he wrote to Bank of Scotland, now part of Lloyds Banking Group, again and was told that it would not lend to companies linked to the hard-hit construction industry.

By this time unable to pay bills to his own suppliers, Lynch's company was placed into liquidation with KPMG after racking up a £24,000 debt to builders' merchant PDN.

Clearly shaken by his experience, Lynch commented: "I am just devastated. I have built this company up over 30 years and it is all gone. They could have lent me the money to keep me afloat through this – and 21 people would not have lost their jobs.

"It just seems so ironic that we were forced into liquidation because of money owing to us from a firm that Bank of Scotland had themselves placed into administration in November."

A spokesman for Bank of Scotland said: "Lloyds Banking Group is one of the most active lenders under the EFG, accounting for around one quarter of all loans offered to SMEs under the scheme. We deal with all customers on an individual basis."

A spokeswoman for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform department, which administers the fund, said the EFG was aimed at companies which did not have sufficient security to obtain a commercial loan.

She added: "We would encourage viable businesses that find themselves at the margins of commercial lending to approach their lender about an EFG loan and we are working with banks to help improve access to finance for small and medium sized firms."

IoD warns of further collapses unless banks ease lending rules

BUSINESS leaders yesterday warned that many companies across Scotland were facing similar problems to Harry Lynch & Co after failing to obtain funding from financial institutions.

David Watt, director of the Institute of Directors Scotland, said: "The banks are packing away bad debt with the government and asking them to take on some of their risk, but the benefits of the incentive schemes do not seem to be filtering down."

He warned that a large number of firms could collapse as a direct result of the banks' refusal to lend.

Watt added: "The feeling is that the banks are still looking for normal guarantees and criteria to lend this money."

Latest figures from the government's department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR), show 2,850 businesses have been offered loans totalling more than £270 million.

The scheme, launched at the beginning of this year, provides banks with £1 billion of guarantees to support to £1.3bn of bank lending.

The money does not come directly from the government – but 75 per cent of a loan granted under the scheme is guaranteed by BERR. The bank would be reimbursed by that amount if the firm it lent to collapsed and failed to repay its debt.

It is understood Bank of Scotland applies the same tight lending criteria to loans offered under the enterprise finance guarantee (EFG) as it would to ordinary commercial loans.

BERR yesterday told The Scotsman EFG was aimed at firms "at the margins of commercial lending" – and who cannot get an ordinary bank loan.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Dr Mike,

Edinburgh 05/06/2009 06:35:04
After 30 years of trading this is a business that could have saved a few pounds for a rainy day rather than be in debt. All small businesses must encouraged to become cash rich as soon as possible, instead of dependent on bank loans. Trouble is the owners tend to want all the trappings of an expensive personal lifestyle first and keep their companies in debt to fund it.
2

Charlie Ferrier,

Hamilton 05/06/2009 06:51:33
I think Dr Mike has never owned a small business to make the comments he has. Reality is that the government should never have routed the top up loans schmes through the banks - they should have set up a separate government run scheme - why would you rely on the greedy banks who simply would take the money to get rid of their red ink
3

Wab,

Edinburgh 05/06/2009 10:31:16
My sympathies lie with Mr Lynch, he has been badly treated by his bank who have it in their power to assist companies like his notwithstanding the current financial climate. I find the comments of clowns like Dr Mike offensive in the extreme. He should try and do what Mr Lynch has done before sounding off about matters obviously beyond his understanding.
4

JayJay,

Right here 05/06/2009 11:25:43
DR Mike, you either work for a bank or are an insolvency practitioner, but either which way you appear to have no understanding of how small businesses operate.
Despite all the blow and guff from Government and the Banks themselves, the harsh reality is that demands for additional security, vastly increased charges, reduction or removal of cashflow finance and so on are now very firmly on the agenda for our main banks. Right off the agenda is new lending or supporting businesses through a recession.
What a grim irony. These idiots lend too much, to too many on absurd over-cooked valuations, enjoy a massive taxpayer funded bailout (in which the key orchestrators of absurd lending policies all slink off under a stone with vast payoffs and/or pensions) then decide to share the misery all round by utterly redrawing lending policy and busting decent, viable businesses all across Scotland.
Meanwhile clever men from the insolvency arms of accountancy firms who should perhaps have done better in their role as auditors, hove into view with a fire sale agenda. Not to worry. Gordon says "he will do all he can to help hard pressed companies". So that's that sorted then!
5

Kingston,

Singapore 05/06/2009 13:27:49
The RBS has money to pay bonuses for bankers, but not Scottish businesses!
6

Highland Mist,

05/06/2009 14:18:42
#1 clearly has little understanding of how business operates and how Entrepreneurism has built the country that we live in - without it there would be no banking industry and these pampered, overpaid bankers would have no job because we'd all be crofters.

I started a business 18 months ago and at that time the (unnamed) Bank was urging me to take on a huge overdraft and credit card facility, which I accepted in part to allow for cash flow and expansion and was told that I 'need only ask' to have it elevated to a higher limit when turnover and cashflow required it.

Business has expanded X 1000 and when I asked for an increase last week due to the enormity of turnover and cashflow requirements to acquire new stock I was refused. With no explanation and with no offer of help in any other way. This is despite not taking a penny from the business, from never being overdrawn and never, ever defaulting or showing any lack of responsibility in business. Gladly I acquired the money for more stock from elsewhere and will continue to grow and flourish but I am aware that there are many similar businesses elsewhere who are not able to do this and will soon have to stop operating because they can not go on without a reasonable banking facility.

Yet these banks have been fed billions from us, the very people who are generating the economy in the way that it needs to go in order to recover. The only people to benefit from the injection of money into banks are the bank employees themselves who continue to be pampered and spoiled, the freebies, the lunches, the expenses paid trips and the bonuses are all intact, while there are thriving businesses in this nation that are going to fail because of lack of banking support due to mismanagement by the self same bankers whose business acumen is clearly less than a Primary school child.

Banks are protecting Banks whilst everyone else is being left to sink in the quagmire that they have created through lack of support and mass
7

Highland Mist,

05/06/2009 14:23:00
cont;
..........through lack of support and massive mismanagement. They have ruined the country and the lives of so many in it and they should swing for it. They are no better than the self serving politicians who are being hounded from office right now.
8

Yorkston Rix,

Edinburgh 05/06/2009 14:26:32
#1:
After 300 years of trading Bank of Scotland is a business that could have saved a few pounds for a rainy day rather than be in debt TO THIS NATION. All banks must be encouraged to become cash rich as soon as possible, instead of being dependent on risky sub-prime loans. Trouble is the executives and shareholders tend to want all the trappings of an expensive personal lifestyle first and make its clients bankrupt to fund it.
9

Keith Lagden,

06/06/2009 03:11:56
Who is the Cretin Dr. Mike, he's talking out of his lower orifice. Perhaps he is supported by the NHS.
10

ias,

London 11/06/2009 16:41:45
I too think that Dr Mike's views are a true expression of ignorance. A banks work or job is to lend, Dr Mike. What has and continues to fail not simply viable businesses, but those hard working, ambitious individuals who form the, are the banker's. This Lbaour Government is responsible for creating a Monster. A Monster who is arrogant and dismissive of its wrongdoings. The Banking Code is weak! Its flimsy information lack specifics and real protection for the consumer. Banks will always have a weak and vulnerable foundation if it is to continue to perch itself on top of Poor Banking Procedures and Dismissive Attitudes. Why do we not have a BIG bank that is STRONG because it is willing to strengthen its foundation by exclusing arrogance from its relationship agenda with business owners and others. A big story has been raised on BBC radio recently, one that is responsible for failing my business. "Banks responsible for Abusing the Government 'Small Firms Loan Guarantee Scheme' and failing viable businesses!.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.