Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call to focus cash on fewer university spin-outs to boost chances of success



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2008
PUBLIC and private sector funding should be targeted on a much smaller number of university spin-out companies to give them a better chance of success.


The call for a more focused approach to financing comes in a report published today, which analyses the history of innovative firms that have grown out of ideas generated by academics.

It finds that despite an increase in the number of spin-
outs from Scotland's universities in the past ten years, fewer are thriving. Top performers such as Axis Shield, which makes medical testing kits and Wolfson, which designs microchips, were established ten or 20 years ago, the study says.

But of around 200 spin-outs from Scottish universities since 1967, almost a third failed while 55 per cent have less than ten employees. Only 16 of these firms employ more than 50 people.

The report – by a technology and innovation consultancy company – was compiled by gathering information from Scottish universities, the people involved in commercialisation, the spin-out firms themselves and private equity backers.

As well as calling for better targeting of money, the report also says that a commercial managing director with market knowledge should be appointed to spin-out companies at an early stage. George Boag, chief executive of Targeting Innovation, which carried out the research, said: "A choice needs to be made between spreading resources thinly to give as many spin-outs as possible a chance, or progressively focusing on a select few.

"Effort and funding might be better directed to ensuring that fewer spin-outs emerged and were nearer to market when they did and that they employed stronger commercial management sooner."

He added: "It has long been recognised that technology from Scotland's universities represents a great opportunity, but this study shows that efforts so far to exploit it have had limited success.

"Many of the more successful companies have taken at least ten years to realise their potential. This is considerably longer than the traditional venture capital exit horizon, which is typically nearer five years."

Universities Scotland, which represents higher education institutions, said the number of spin-outs surviving more than three years had increased by 12 per cent between 2004-5 and 2005-6.

A spokeswoman for Universities Scotland said: "Most spin-outs are extremely successful and comprise some of Scotland's most innovative companies."



A Scottish Government spokesman said: "University spin-out companies are of great value to Scotland and there have been a number of success stories in recent years.

"Improvement of knowledge transfer, including the development of spin-outs, is a key national indicator for the Scottish Government's goal of sustainable economic growth."









The full article contains 452 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 June 2008 7:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's economy
 
1

Dissector,

Stirling 23/06/2008 09:38:19
For once, a report that states the clear truth about spin-outs while the comments from both the Universities' spokeswoman and Folyrood spokesman underline the long-standing position of denial taken by both organisations.
University spin-out success rates are totally inadequate and the key reason, as given by George Boag, is lack of commercial management. The erroneous attitude of the universities and Folyrood that "The technology is so good people will undoubtedly buy it" highlights the lack of commercial expertise generally residing within the organisations. The reality is that nothing sells without all-round commercial management and effort.
2

Ian on 2-wheels,

Edinburgh 23/06/2008 10:01:52
I am not sure why the poster above thinks that the Universities are unaware of the need for commercial management. Check out the case study of MTEM. An ex-Schlumberger manager was brought in at an early stage, and the company's growth rate was rapid and impressive. The other statistics here simply reflect the Scottish economy as a whole, i.e. most companies are small, and many are "lifestyle" companies with limited growth prospects. No surprises there. It is true that most academic spin-out teams need to be supplemented by commercial experience, and the University commercialisation offices are smart enough to know that.
I would also question how anybody is supposed to pick winners in the manner suggested above. If technology is truly disruptive will it be dismissed or supported? Surely it is better for universities to push the ideas out and let the market determine which are winners?
If the Universities tried to pick winners doubtless they would be criticised for that policy also.
3

DAMcK,

Lanark 23/06/2008 12:04:42
There is no doubt an element of commercial mismanagement and pre-development market research in some of this. In my exerience, the reason that a lot fail and even more fail to achieve higher levels of growth and employment is because when the government funding and assistnace runs out, the companies are hamstrung by lack of financial assistance from elsewhere.
4

,

23/06/2008 15:34:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.