Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Walsh: Scotland needs Heathrow to have third runway

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 October 2009
WILLIE Walsh, chief executive of British Airways, last night pledged the company's commitment to Scotland but warned that failure to build a third runway at Heathrow would lead to an "inevitable erosion" of Scottish services in future.
In a wide-ranging speech to the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, Walsh also attacked next month's increases in air passenger duty, calling the rises "unjust, untimely and unhelpful" for the economy.

He said the price hikes would hit the industry in a year when it is already expected to nurse £7 billion of losses worldwide.

Stepping into the general election battle, Walsh reserved his greatest criticism for the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats who have expressed their firm opposition to an expansion of Heathrow.

Walsh said: "Heathrow may be operating more reliably and punctually than for many years but it still lacks vital runway capacity when compared to competitor hubs in Paris, Frankfurt and Amsterdam.

"Heathrow desperately needs space to expand flights to China, India, South America and many other parts of the world where international trade is developing rapidly. And the reality is that Heathrow will never be able to provide significant improvement in services to Scotland without additional runway capacity."

Walsh, who earlier this year admitted that BA faces a fight for survival, shrugged off recent remarks from the European Union that its merger plans with the Spanish carrier Iberia, plus a separate tie-up with American Airlines, are likely to falter on competition grounds. He admitted that negotiations have taken "longer than we might have originally anticipated" but he added: "I remain confident in both outcomes and we expect important developments with American Airlines by the end of this month." Talks with Iberia are expected to be finalised by Christmas.

Walsh also addressed recent plans for a high-speed rail link to cut down journey times between London and Scotland. He stressed that improvements in train travel "must be complementary to air travel, not a substitute for it".

He said: "Delivering better links to Scotland should be happening now – not in ten or 20 years as is currently proposed."

Walsh admitted that BA will operate a reduced timetable to Scotland this winter compared to last year. Forty flights will depart London each day to the various Scottish airports. But Walsh stressed BA's service is still "significantly more than any other operator".

He said: "Scotland remains a crucial market for us and giving Scotland global connectivity via London is fundamental to our schedule."

Figures released yesterday showed BA passenger numbers fell 1.7 per cent last month.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 October 2009 11:16 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's airports
 
1

,

06/10/2009 06:54:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Bugger Lugs,

06/10/2009 08:59:50
Walsh is a tosseur.

He has already shown his disregard for Scotland by moving everything to London.

Let him bleat away, we can always go to Amsterdam, Frankfurt or Paris for longhaul connections and I am sure that Air France, Lufthansa and KLM will oblige with increased feeder service.

B A has always used Scotland as a Milk Cow to bolster the London airports.

Let BA go to Hell I and many former customers say.

As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
3

John JP,

Wishaw 06/10/2009 11:39:49
I choose Amsterdam Schiphol and KLM every time. Dutch are very organised and efficient.
4

The Answer,

Glasgow 06/10/2009 12:12:30
International passengers to and from UK airorts Aug 09

29,610 Durham, England
30,064 Norwich, England
32,324 Blackpool, England
37,148 Humberside, England
62,370 Exeter, England

77,789 Aberdeen scotland

80,101 Southampton, England
87,581 Bournemouth, England
93,907 Doncaster, England

142,695 prestwick scotland

149,104 London City, England
283,640 Leeds, England

385,763 glasgow scotland

414,999 Newcastle, England
451,684 Liverpool, Engand

481,924 edinburgh scotland

484,831 East Midlands, England
572,595 Bristol, England
893,027 Birmingham, England
893,454 London Luton, England
1,911,201 Manchester, England
2,028,486 London Stansted, England
3,382,531 London Gatwick, England
5,894,447 London Heathrow, England



CAA
tinyurl.com/yephh5y
5

The Busman,

06/10/2009 13:41:36
Not quite. The market between Scotland and London has two quite distinct parts to it - that which is interlining at Heathrow to travel further afield, and that which has London as a final destination or origin.

The *second* market could quite easily be shifted to the rest of the London airport system (Luton, Stansted, Gatwick, London City). The interlining market is another matter, and it is possible that a regulatory solution would be to clamp down on domestic-origin or -destination passengers using LHR; this would mean more capacity for interlined traffic.

On the other hand, one can always interline through Amsterdam, Frankfurt or even Dubai if you are going further afield. This is what BAA are really worried about; BA just might have to abandon much of its London-doemstic market to other operators.
6

Mister Niceguy,

Edinburgh 06/10/2009 15:00:35
Walsh is wrong. Having withdrawn all non-London services from Scotland and indeed the rest of the UK he has a cheek to say that we now "need" runway space at Heathrow. He rightly states that Heathrow needs more capacity to compete with Paris and Frankfurt but he shouldn't assume that we'd rather use Heathrow over those other two hubs.

"Commitment to Scotland" is not just providing feeders to Heathrow. It's about providing a network of direct international flights and until BA does that he won't get sympathy here.
7

Andrew.,

Edinburgh 06/10/2009 22:04:20
Scotland doesn't need regular flights to London, it needs Transport Scotland to stand up and say "We'll fund a brand new High Speed Rail Link as far as Carlisle or Newcastle if you'll extend from Manchester/Leeds to the northern cities."
8

truthsleuth,

06/10/2009 23:34:14
All those useless statistics from 'busman'

Scotland needs Heathrow like it needs that silly bridge.

Scotland would be best served by NO third runway at Heathrow. In fact all UK regional airports would benefit as International/Long distance flights expansion would have to be farmed out among the Regional aitports

This farming out of the longer distance flights would make regional airports the beneficiaries of the profitable longer haul flights enabling them to shake off the yoke of Easy Jet and Ryanair.

The Regioal airports could then charge Easy Jet and its lot far more to land (or take off).

Don't fall for Irish blarney their flights are not cheap the taxpayer and ratepayer subsidises them.
9

truthsleuth,

06/10/2009 23:49:53
No Mr Walsh Regional Airports will NOT benefit from Heathrows third runway.
If this runway is not built the regional airports will stand a greater chance of more direct medium and long distance routes.
Thes are the profitable routes for any airport whereas the short haul stuff 'costs' regional airports money.

No third runway at Heathrow would mean Regional airports could begin charging 'Blarney Airlines' higher landing charges rather than subsidising maney of the short haul routes.

Far better high speed rail services are developed
Scotland could pull a fast one on the English by builsding the first section of such a line linking Edinburgh with Glasgow,and their airports.
The two airports co-operating on overtseas flights they could provide a unified air service to a far greater number of destinations.

A usefull beginning could be made by abandoning the bridge to far and using the freed up funding to fund the high speed link in Scotland.

Fourty miles between Edinburgh and Glasgow would cost far less than the £3billion cost of the bridge.



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.