Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Passengers on the up with 30,000 per day at Edinburgh airport

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 September 2009
BOOMING audiences at the Edinburgh Fringe and expansion by Ryanair have lifted passengers at the city's airport by 42,000 in August, in its fifth consecutive monthly rise.
The 4.8 per cent increase on a year ago to 928,500 passengers – almost 30,000 a day – also pushed the airport's annual total back above 9 million.

It follows the airport recording its busiest ever month in July, when it handled 955,800 passengers.


Ryanair's routes from Edinburgh have more than quadrupled to 29 since last year and it accounts for around one in five of the airport's passengers.

The Edinburgh Festival Fringe enjoyed record-breaking ticket sales, up by 21 per cent on 2008.

The boost came as Glasgow airport's fortunes slumped further, with 713,700 passengers – 13.4 per cent less than a year ago. Glasgow has lost more than one million – or one in eight – passengers – in a year, with the total now down to 7.4 million, the lowest for more than seven years.

BAA Scotland, which runs the country's three busiest airports, blamed the recession for both Glasgow's slide and a 9.8 per cent fall at Aberdeen to 269,800 passengers.

Annual passengers at Aberdeen were down more than 9 per cent to fewer than 3.1 million.

However, the operator said it remained confident growth would return at both airports once the economy picked up.

A spokeswoman said: "With five consecutive months of rising passenger numbers, Edinburgh Airport is one of the few UK airports currently enjoying a period of growth, largely as a result of Ryanair's substantial growth and the success of this year's Edinburgh Festival.

"International traffic was particularly strong as the city welcomed tens of thousands of overseas visitors for this year's Festival, the most successful ever.

"Aberdeen and Glasgow, in common with almost every UK airport, experienced a drop. This reflects the continuing impact of the global recession, which has seen demand for air travel fall across the globe.

"Quite simply, fewer people are taking holidays and weekend breaks, or flying on business, as a result of the recession."

BAA said the expected recovery would be hampered by increases in air passenger duty (APD) in November.

The tax will rise from £10 to £11 for flights within Europe, and from £40 to £45-55 for longer routes, depending on distance.

The BAA spokeswoman said: "Unfortunately, the recovery will not be aided by the UK government's forthcoming rise in APD, which stands in sharp contrast to a number of other European countries which are reducing taxes on air travel."

Ryanair also attacked the APD increases. A spokesman for the airline said: "Ryanair will grow by 15 per cent to 67 million passengers this year. Airports like Edinburgh can benefit from this growth but there can be no doubt that Gordon Brown's £11 APD is devastating tourism and traffic throughout the UK."







Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 September 2009 9:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's airports
 
1

Brianwci,

11/09/2009 02:27:30
Brilliant. Yet in the days when it was illegal for all but domestic aircraft to land or take off from Scottish airports (London greed again) an argument for not giving Scots airports international flights is there 'was no demand'.

Now there's 30,000 A DAY coming through Edinburgh alone!!!

Sounds a bit like there is no demand for Independence. We'll soon see once we get the Referendum.
2

Mr. Borat Sagdiyev,

Kuzcek, Kazakhstan 11/09/2009 07:23:21
Excellent news for EDI. Unfortunately that is likely to be short-lived, as our small-minded, greedy, ignorant government seeks to destroy tourism and the aviation industry with APD.

Why are Labour and the Tories so anti-aviation? Is it something to do with freedom perhaps? Eco-Nazi-ism? Or just a crass way of grabbing cash to balance the books they messed up so badly?

PS Yes Brian, we need the referendum... then when the majority votes against an indy' Scotland the issue shall be done and dusted and we shall never hear about it again, thank goodness.
3

Mr. Borat Sagdiyev,

Kuzcek, Kazakhstan 11/09/2009 08:57:42
Joe

I think it's an Eco-Nazi thing. They can't be seen to be cuddling up to aviation, which in Greenie LaLaLand is the big bad devil Earth destroyer. ;)

Borat
4

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

Guardbridge 11/09/2009 09:42:40
If politicians had a scrap of common sense they would plan for and fund a tram line from the city centre to the airport! Its the sensible way forward.
5

AIasdair,

11/09/2009 09:45:14
#3, Joe - the usual mix of lies and invective, eh Joe?

Dear me, you'd think you'd get tired of being embarrassed on here.

Shall I link to some examples, or do you want to go back under your rock?

6

Mr. Borat Sagdiyev,

Kuzcek, Kazakhstan 11/09/2009 10:50:22
Rail link was a great idea, unfortunately the Ess En Pee in their infinite wisdom torpedoed it.
7

AIasdair,

11/09/2009 12:43:49
Yes, Joe.

The facts about EARL are that the SNP suported the idea in principle, but said that it was EARL or the trams. Labour, the Tories, and the Lib Dems stated that they would all overrule an SNP attempt to get ditch the tram scheme.

I realise that this hurts your position, but that's the truth.

What is more, you mention the GARL link... the SNP may have let it go ahead, but it was a Labour-approved scheme to begin with! Much as you may want to point to it as being some weird SNP bias for the weegies, it's not the case.

But then, truth is never your strong point, now is it?
I seem to recall you also said that the M74 completion was an example of pro-Glasgow SNP bias (even though they're trying their damnedest to get us a new Forth crossing!). It was pointed out to you that the M74 link is to relieve traffic on the Kingston Bridge - Europe's busiest road bridge. You went off on one, claiming that it wasn't Eurpoe's busiest, and this was an example of "weegies always saying they're the biggest". Someone posted a link showing it is the busiest, and you scarpered.
Want me to post the link to that page?
It'll take me two seconds to find it - just say the word.

The problem with you is, that you are filled with hatred and prejudice concerning the SNP and Glasgow, that any decent points you ever make get totally swamped and undermined by the torrent of invented invective that spews out in the rest of your posts.

As ever, by the way, I am aware that your usual tactic when these home truths are listed is to get the posts remeoved, so I've copied the above. Remove it at your leisure; it'll shortly reappear.
8

Unimpressed one,

11/09/2009 13:18:45
Watched one of the millipede brothers on Newsnight ranting on how Liebore were for clamping down on flying, but wouldn't penalise ordinary people for doing so. He was supported by a lesbian eco-nutter talking from New York and when Paxman asked her how she could propose banning flying yet she'd just flown 3,000 miles, typically she justified it by saying that her trips were more justified than others because she was on a mission to 'save the planet'. Daft bitch.
9

AIasdair,

11/09/2009 15:43:21
Nice one, Joe.

Next time you want to claim someone's wrong, why not actually try posting up the REASONS.

You know - justify yourself.. ideally link to evidence.. present an argument.. the sort of thin intelligent folk take rather for granted.

We'll start with an easy one: when you said the Kingston Bridge was not Europe's busiest, and that do say it was was some mad self-aggrandisment by weegies, were you:
a) correct
b) wrong and acting like and insecure child
??


Pray elucidate.
10

Mr. Borat Sagdiyev,

Kuzcek, Kazakhstan 11/09/2009 18:14:36
Come on lads, grow up eh.

Long may EDI continue to flourish. Third parallel runway more than welcome!
11

AIasdair,

12/09/2009 11:39:10
#14 - so you can't post up a link?

Quelle suprise.

If you've done it so many times before, it should be very easy to post up something factual.

You never answered the question about the Kingston Bridge.

IDIOT.
12

AIasdair,

13/09/2009 17:48:55
So link to an example of these things you've posted, Joe.

Prove me wrong.

Here's some for you:
-----------------
"The Kingston Bridge opened in 1969 and the ten-lanes (five in each direction) have made it Europe's busiest road bridge, with 180,000 vehicles a day using it."

http://www.rampantscotland.com/glasgow/glw_kingston.htm
------------------

------------------
Delays stretch on Europe's busiest bridge

25 April 2003
By JIM MCBETH
THE tailback to Europe’s busiest road bridge promised to get longer yesterday by the length of a summer.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Delays-stretch-on-Europes-busiest.2421819.jp
------------------

------------------
As the busiest road bridge in Europe, carrying over 180,000 vehicles a day, the Kingston Bridge comprises five traffic lanes in each direction, supported by two monumental concrete arcs.

http://www.archlighting.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=1326&articleID=452382
------------------

etc. etc.

You see, Joe.

What I've done above, THAT is posting links. It is different to what you do, which is claim that you post links.

Do you see the difference, Joe?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.