Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Windfall to boost declining policies


Norwich Union customers are set to receive a special £2.3bn bonus

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 February 2008
MORE than a million Norwich Union policyholders are to receive a special bonus which could boost their endowments, pensions or bonds by 10% over the next three years, and may go some way to freeing them from the burden of big financial black holes.
The windfall is being released because the company says it has moved part of its investments into lower-risk holdings, and does not need so much capital to back its promises to customers.

And there could be more money on the way. This bonus is par
t of an ongoing process of unlocking a treasure chest valued at £5.5bn held by the company. This excess cash, known as the inherited estate, was built up over the years, not least as a result of mergers with General Accident and Commercial Union.

Policyholders will share £2.3bn through this distribution. The company is still arguing with its policyholder advocate Clare Spottiswoode about what should happen to the remaining £3bn-plus.

But not everyone is on target for rich pickings. To qualify for the bonus, customers must be members of the company's main CGNU or Culac funds, which were formed following the mergers with General Accident and Commercial Union.

The original Norwich Union savers, now locked in the closed Norwich Union life fund, get nothing. An NU spokesman said this was because they received a free share windfall when the company demutualised.

Furthermore, customers must be holding policies on January 1, 2008, 2009 and 2010. On these dates a bonus worth a little over 3% will be added to the value of their contracts.

However, not everyone is happy. Spottiswoode, who was appointed as a policyholder advocate in 2006 to examine ways in which the entire inherited estate could be distributed fairly between customers and the company, says the money should have been paid in one lump sum and in cash. She is concerned that many policyholders whose contracts mature before the end date will miss out.

Spottiswoode said: "I am disappointed the payment is to be made over a three-year period. The surplus funds are available now, yet policyholders whose policies mature before the end of the three years will not be paid the full amount.



"I have also pressed for this special distribution to be backdated to those policyholders whose polices matured naturally after November 21, 2006, as a matter of fairness. I have raised these matters with the company and the Financial Services Authority, but my views have not been adopted."



Negotiations are continuing over the more than £3bn remaining in the inherited estate. Spottiswoode intends to press for any future bonuses to be distributed via a cash payment.

But the bonuses will come as a boost for the million Norwich Union policyholders on target for a windfall, and it will help lift the maturity values of customers whose policies come to the end of the term this year.

For example, a mortgage endowment customer who has paid £50 monthly into the CGNU fund for the past 25 years was due to have picked up £45,911. Instead his lump sum will be boosted to £47,565 thanks to the bonus. Elsewhere in the group, the old Commercial Union fund (Culac) was due to produce £39,321 (down from £43,697 last year), but this year investors will get £40,745.

In contrast, fellow policyholders in the closed Norwich Union fund will only pocket £39,357 (down from £42,133).

However, these payouts will raise returns to policyholders, pushing NU up the performance league tables. At most other companies, payouts continue to slide. Clerical Medical mortgage endowment will produce a £39,401 nest egg, compared with £43,687 last year. Standard Life only manages £37,763, and Friends Provident £36,425 (down from £37,540).

Again, CGNU pensions customers are celebrating their special bonus. A 20-year £200 monthly premium pension will now produce £116,043. This compares with £104,976 from the old Norwich Union fund.

Similarly, the value of investment bonds have been boosted. NU will now turn £10,000 into £15,994 over five years or £16,200 over 10 years.





The full article contains 694 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 February 2008 4:58 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 10/02/2008 11:23:52
I'm sorry but it isn't a widfall, this money belongs to the policyholders. They are using the money in a desperate attempt to stop the outflow of funds.

http://www.policyholderadvocate.org.uk

These life companies are no better than muggers in the street, the only difference is that muggers can, and do, get caught and they are charged with a criminal offence, oh, and they are no regulated by their friends.
2

Active Sassenach,

Luton, England 10/02/2008 14:36:31
The old Commercial Union and General Accident life funds were very strong. Norwich Union demutualised out of weakness. If the fund streams were kept separate to reflect this, NU (proper) policyholders would just have to take it on the chin. However, NU (proper) policyholders still have the mis-selling costs charged to their fund. Spottiswoode has lost the plot on her actual role kicking up a storm about this with the FSA. As I get nothing from her efforts, my demutualisation shares just have to bear her £250,000 salary and the massive costs of running her office.

The shares received by demutualised NU policyholders are worth less now than they were when issued in 1997. I have asked Clare Spottiswoode to explain why NU (proper) policyholders are not considered by her at all in this negotiation regarding the possible re-attribution of the inherited estate. She has refused to answer my question.

For example, a massive re-organisation of the life funds took place after the NU and CGU integration that created AVIVA plc. NU (proper) policyholders did not benefit from any underpinning of their guarantees in that re-organisation.

And do, please, remember to which policyholders the 'excess' funds now belong. That is those policyholders who were paid what, at the time, looked like their fair share in the past when their policies matured - but which has, with hindsight, turned out to be too conservative. Nobody in those funds today has any moral right to that money and nor do the shareholders.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.