Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pensions overhaul could damage existing schemes, experts warn



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 August 2008
THE Government's planned overhaul of pensions through the introduction of Personal Accounts in 2012 could damage existing company schemes and prove to be an expensive mistake, pension experts have warned.
Personal Accounts are being established as part of the National Pensions Saving Scheme to tackle the public's failure to save enough for their retirement. They are included in the Pensions Bill due to receive Royal assent in October.

All worker
s will be automatically enrolled into Personal Accounts, occupational pensions schemes or group personal pensions with a compulsory employer contribution.

Rachel Vahey, head of pensions development at life and pensions firm Aegon UK, said that while there is consensus on the need for the Government to take action to encourage long-term saving, there are inherent problems with Personal Accounts that must be ironed out.

She said they "cannot be allowed to fail" because of the devastating effect this would have on the entire pensions industry.

One of her main concerns is that the red tape involved in introducing the new system could be damaging for companies already offering good schemes and disrupt the provisions they are making for employees.

Small companies are likely to feel the biggest impact.

She said: "Even someone employing a nanny or a hotel with seasonal staff will have to offer a scheme."

She added that a "big stick" approach is being adopted by the Government to force companies to offer a scheme as it will be a criminal offence for them to fail to do so.

Another issue is the Government's decision to build the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority (Pada) from scratch to introduce the system, rather than use the existing infrastructure and experience available from life and pensions companies.

Vahey said: "Why go to the expense of building something new? It's like trying to create another life office."

The Department of Work and Pensions has committed £36m to Pada this year alone and Vahey wants more transparency on what the money will be spent on.

Vahey becomes the senior executive in the pensions division following the retirement of Stewart Ritchie as director of pensions at Aegon UK on Friday. He warned that if the Conservatives won the next election it could disrupt the introduction of Personal Accounts.

"Even if something is on the statute books it isn't set in stone. After Labour came into power in 1974 Barbara Castle tore up the Keith Joseph plan for pensions and replaced it with the Social Security Pension Act which introduced the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme."



The full article contains 428 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 August 2008 3:15 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Colston Hicks,

Cardiff 03/08/2008 15:36:43
Personal Accounts are doomed to failure.
The Government is setting up a scheme to " encourage long-term saving ".
The scheme proposed is actually 'long-term gambling'.
Without the guarantee of Gilts (not available since 1997)no worker will have a GUARANTEE of a pension pot of any size.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.