Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 8th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

IFA of the Year competitors hoping for second-half revival



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 July 2008
FORTUNATELY for our IFA of the Year competitors – and for case study Angus MacDonald – this is a game of two halves. It's unlikely that any of the IFAs expected market conditions to make life so difficult for them, and the last month in particular has wreaked havoc in all of the portfolios.
For the first time this year, every competitor is in the red, with some down more than 10 per cent from the starting level. Hard-earned gains painstakingly carved out over the first five months disappeared in the month to 15 July, to the extent that
even our leader has turned Angus's investment of £300,000 into £281,460, a loss of 6.18 per cent.

It'll be interesting to see where they go from here, given the opportunity for the first time to see how they are faring in terms of the competition. Of those that have stuck to their guns, some have done so more successfully than others. Likewise, small amendments have paid off in some cases, but large scale changes have proved largely fruitless.

At this point the temptation to take more risk than is appropriate for the case study could prove too great in a bid to make up lost ground. But the competition is about MacDonald's long-term aims, so our advisers will look to demonstrate their understanding of the environment in which they are operating and how it should be negotiated.

The table, above shows the situation so far, based not only on the current value of their portfolio, but on an agreed criteria. Using these criteria, the six judges have scored each IFA based on their perceived fulfilment of the case study remit.

1 – Duncan Mackenzie – Mackenzie Wealth Management

2 – Keith Thomson – Blackadders

3 – John Moore – Central Investment Services

4 – Mark Houghton – Condies Wealth Management

5 – David Rankin – Bell Lawrie

6 – Willie Crockett – Edinburgh Risk Management

7 – Gordon Forbes – Caledonia Asset Management

8 – David Thomson – VWM Wealth Management

9 – Adeline Christy – Kudos Financial Services

10 – Steve Wilson – Alan Steel Asset Management





The full article contains 350 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 July 2008 5:22 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: IFA of the Year 2008
 
1

Caldean,

Fife 29/07/2008 18:21:44
Having read previous comments and discussions regarding the merits or otherwise of this competition, I note Costorphinery has been rather subdued in recent months. I have tracked his random 10 stock portfolio with interest and note that it has fallen 14.58% from 18th January 2008 ( the start date of the competition) to 15th July 2008. In fact if it had not been for the random inclusion of Delica then it would have fallen by 19.05%. Not only is the portfolio concentrated in the UK and all in equities, if this individual was advising this fictional client, who of course is a relatively cautious individual in investment risk terms, he would have been by now reported to the FSA for bad advice, negligence, fined and forced to compensate him. He would also be in danger of being barred from the industry. Perhaps it would be better if he considered this and the fact that it is all very well to lose his own money but losing someone else's savings is entirely a different matter.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.