Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Pensions liabilities deter bids, CBI says

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 June 2009
THE CBI will this week demand a level playing field for private companies taking on the cost of public sector pensions when they win outsourcing contracts.
The employers' organisation will claim that the issue has become a make-or-break consideration for companies bidding for such work.

It will recommend that the Department of Health and other departments grant membership of their schemes to provider
s by creating a Public Sector Participating Employer (PSPE) scheme to share risk and responsibility between provider and public body.

Speakers from the public service, pension and legal experts as well as government and opposition spokesmen will address a meeting in London on Friday.

The issue came to prominence in Glasgow when Connaught, a facilities provider, pulled out of a maintenance contract with Glasgow Housing Association over the size of the pension liability it was expected to take on. There were further developments yesterday when The Scotsman revealed that the board of GHA is on the verge of standing down following criticism from the Scottish Housing Regulator.

CBI Scotland's assistant director David Lonsdale said the organisation supported the switch of work to the private sector to ease pressure on the public purse and seek value for money. But the CBI is concerned the pensions issue will deter bidders.

"We are concerned that the policy framework to support competitive neutrality in 'public markets' is not fit for purpose," he said.

"The dearth of transparency and accuracy in costing public sector pension arrangements is a concern, particularly when it sustains an uneven playing field between private firms having to compete with existing public sector providers."



The full article contains 273 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 June 2009 2:18 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.