Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pension scheme that companies can no longer afford to offer



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 April 2008
FINAL-SALARY pension schemes are a dying breed in the private sector, and the majority have already keeled over.


They are now generally only afforded to public-sector workers – and many of those have to contribute.

Ineos workers have enjoyed what one expert called a "Rolls-Royce" deal, which gave them a pension of 1/60th of their final salary for every y
ear worked without contributing a penny.

Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said a worker currently on £50,000 who retired on £60,000 would build up 1/60th of £60,000 – £1,000 – for every year worked.

If they had 40 years of service on retirement – the normal maximum for a final-salary scheme – they would get a £40,000 annual pension.

But Ineos claims this deal is no longer sustainable in today's financial world. Management says it is paying out 25 per cent of its wages bill on pensions and see this rising to 50 per cent in the future.

The firm wants to introduce a contributory scheme for existing employees, which would involve them paying 6 per cent of their salary, phased in at 1 per cent a year from next April.

Under the final version of this scheme, an employee on £40,000 would pay £2,400 a year from their salary – £200 a month – towards their pension and the employer would make up the rest, 19 per cent.

However, new employees would not get access to this and would be invited to join a defined contribution scheme.

Mr McPhail said: "With defined contribution, the employer says, 'I'll put in X per cent. What you get back depends on what the investment yields'. That's much more attractive from an employer's point of view."

John Sansone, practice manager in employee benefits at Towry Law, said in such schemes the employer tended to contribute 6-8 per cent and the employee 3-5 per cent.



The full article contains 332 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2008 11:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

beeree,

Local 26/04/2008 07:40:05
There in business and can't do simple sums. It appears to me they either shouldn't be in business OR they're at it.

Most likely the latter. They will most likely start giving a hard luck story of people living longer, poor stock market returns etc etc. All having an element of truth but on a long term basis all being capable of being factored in.

Ineos are being plain greedy.

I don't like Unite but for once they are doing a trade unions duty.
2

mr angry,

ayrshire 26/04/2008 08:33:47
At the end of the day if the comapany does not make enough money to be able to invest in its future these idiots will not need to worry about pension contributions , they will be on the dole. Far better to pay a small amount and share the burden with your employer and safeguard jobs. These people seem to be being used as cannon fodder by the union.
3

iain,

edinburgh 26/04/2008 08:59:11
The reason why most employers can no longer afford defined benefit pension schemes is largely due to GORDON BROWN who single handed did more to wreck the private sector db pension system by putting up taxes and massively increasing regulatory hurdles than any previous government. Under Tony Blair MP's pension scheme was made one of the most generous in the UK.
4

Toast,

26/04/2008 12:05:58
Why should workers in the private sector subsidise public workers pensions,there was a time when public sector workers wages were poorer than their private sector counterparts and an excellent pension was compensation, but these days are long gone,it is fair to help public sector workers earning less than £15,000 P/A ,but the rest should be making serious contributions to their own pensions
5

,

26/04/2008 20:00:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.