Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Christmas Gift Guide

Lego rebuilds its case for a brick trademark

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2009
LEGO, maker of the iconic toy brick, yesterday launched a legal bid to win back its trademark.
The company was last year stripped of the right to keep the brick's three-dimensional 2x4 shape as its EU trademark, after a challenge from rival toy maker Mega Brands, which markets Mega Bloks.

The EU's trademark office, OHIM, granted Lego the le
gal right to the shape in 1999, but then agreed with Mega Bloks' case that a brick was a functional, technical shape which could not be owned by any one company.

Lego has already lost one courtroom battle to win the rights back. Its lawyers returned to the European Court of First Instance in Luxembourg again yesterday to begin anew.

They claim that Lego brick design contains characteristics that set it apart from others – such as the design and size of the studs on top of the bricks.

The company is challenging the previous decision, that functional shapes, such as a brick, must be excluded from trademark protection.

Otherwise, the court argued, one company would have a monopoly on a basic shape which could be deemed to be "necessary to obtain a technical result".

The Danish toymaker's basic red plastic Lego 2x4 brick was literally the building block for a global toy industry success.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 November 2009 8:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.