Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Aviation industry awaits WTO's verdict on public finance for Airbus

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2009
THE aviation industry is on high alert for the outcome of a World Trade Organisation inquiry into whether European government aid to Airbus allowed the company to surpass Boeing unfairly as the leading producer of commercial planes.
The WTO yesterday handed both the United States and the European Union a 1,000-page report with more details on the outcome expected over the coming days.

The US and Europe have long been at loggerheads over billions of dollars of European government financing, which helped Airbus to develop new planes. The Americans lodged a complaint that the subsidies were unfair and harmed US interests.

The WTO's ruling is expected to set important precedents on how far governments are able to go to support their own aviation industries.

Both Washington and Brussels yesterday confirmed they had received the report, but would not provide further details.

Deborah Mesloh, deputy assistant US trade representative in Washington, said: "In this dispute, the United States is challenging dozens of measures providing billions of dollars in subsidies to Airbus, including launch aid to every major Airbus aircraft model."

She added: "The dispute has proven to be one of the most complex and lengthy disputes under the WTO."

Arch rivals Boeing and Airbus are locked in two separate disputes as they both vie for a bigger share of the global aviation market, which is expected to grow to $3.2 trillion over the next 20 years. In the other case, Europe alleges that Boeing benefited from government subsidies from the US defence department and Nasa.

Lutz Guellner, spokesman for the European trade commissioner, said yesterday: "This report is only half of the story, and we await the interim report in the case launched by the EU against the US, which we expect to be issued in a few months."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 September 2009 12:02 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

gus1940,

Edinburgh 05/09/2009 08:59:17
In the 1950's The USAF bought more than 800 of the military versions of the Boeing 707.

Any notion of mine that this order in any way subsidised the development and sale of the civil airliner would of course be ridiculous.

For the US to accuse Airbus of receiving unfair government subsidy is typical of the hypocrisy we can expect from that whiter than white country where there has never been any hint of corruption re the aircraft industry. Oops - I forgot the disgraceful saga of the sale of F104G Starfighters to assorted NATO countries at the expense of European manufacturers.

2

truthsleuth,

09/09/2009 00:32:59
The 'truth' of the matter is that the aviation industry whether research manufacture or in use is in reciept of enormous subsidies most of them 'hidden' under a 'defence' umbrella.

THe Concorde a realy beautiful plane and a technological marvel is indicative of this hidden subsidy. Its real benefit though was to plane spotters and David Frost et al.

3

truthsleuth,

09/09/2009 00:36:56
PS the Eurofighter is yet another example of a beautiful plane great at aerobatics, but of doubtful future defence needs.
And part of the reason our troops in Afghanistan do not have enough helicopters.

Perhaps we should take the pilots away from aerobatics and give them a crash helicopter course. Mothball the Eurofighters (certainly do not build anymore) and pay for more Chinooks with appropriate software.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.