Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Call to ban rights issue stock shorting



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 July 2008
A LEADING small shareholder group last night called for a complete ban on "shorting" stock in rights issues.
The move comes after the disclosure that Morgan Stanley took a 2.3 per cent short position in HBOS after the banking giant's rights issue closed last Friday.

Roger Lawson, director of the United Kingdom Shareholders Association (UKSA), said he acc
epted that the investment bank, a leading underwriter to HBOS's £4 billion share-issue flop, had not acted illegally.

But he said the equity trading side of Morgan Stanley would have known from all the publicity ahead of the rights issue close that a massive rump of shares would be left with the underwriters, and that it would depress the share price. In the event nearly 92 per cent was left over.

Lawson said: "My concern is that these people move the market by their actions. If they short the stock there is only one place for the stock to go. That is market manipulation. Selling short is a self-fulfilling exercise."

He added that such practices, even though technically legal, were "questionable activities that should be stopped in rights issue periods".

He said UKSA, an influential stock-market pressure group, believed it would be better to ban all such shorting during rights issues.

UKSA believed the alternative of just banning leading underwriters from shorting during cash calls on shareholders was impractical.

If UKSA's suggestion were adopted it would go further than the recent order by the Financial Services Authority for any investor shorting 0.25 per cent or more in a rights issue period to have to make it public.

In a share rollercoaster ride, HBOS's shares closed 20p below the 275p rights issue price last Wednesday, when most institutions made up their minds not to take up their rights.

The stock bounced to 282p on the day the cash call closed on Friday and various hedge funds are believed to have approached Morgan Stanley to cover their own short positions in HBOS.

The gamble came good for the investment bank on Monday, however, when following news of the amount left with underwriters – 62 per cent – HBOS's shares duly fell 6 per cent to 264.5p.

Morgan Stanley would not comment last night. But it is understood the bank believes it acted properly throughout.

It is understood the FSA agrees that the bank broke no rules, and City sources say Morgan kept the regulator abreast of the possibility of it shorting HBOS stock once the rights issue closed up to two days before that closure.

In addition, City experts say it is important that Morgan Stanley did not seek out clients for the stock but were approached.

Last night leading City bodies appeared to suggest there had been no conflict of interest.

The Association of British Insurers, National Association of Pension Funds and Investment Management Association said they had received no complaints from their members.

HBOS shares last night closed 3.5p lower at 261p.

BACKGROUND

SHORTING stock is common City practice, a gamble that shares are going to fall farther.

Sometimes shorting is used to hedge positions institutions hold in shares, catering for market volatility, and other times as part of a trading strategy to make quick profits.

Shorters sell shares they do not own, but have borrowed from other institutions – often pension funds – for a fee.

Gauging market sentiment, those shorting the stock are betting that it will continue to go down in value. If this happens the shorters buy the shares at the cheaper price and return them to the original owner.

They pocket the difference in price as profit after subtracting the fees they have had to pay.

If a firm's shares were at £10 and a short seller bought 100, they would sell them immediately for £1,000.

If the price dropped to £5, they would then buy them at that price, £500, return the shares to their owner, making £500, minus the fee paid to the institution who lent the shares.



The full article contains 673 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Glasgow Expat,

Desert 23/07/2008 05:50:05
What a hoot. You couldn't make it up. "If they short the stock there is only one place for the stock to go". What?? Does this man know nothing about supply and demand? The stock will go down if more is supplied than demanded. Full stop. Less was demanded than supplied so the stock went down. It's called a free market! If the stock was worth demanding (buying) then people would have bought and that demand would have overcome the supply (shorts). Get real people. Ban the "bullish bias" I say. That has done and will continue to do more damage to people's savings than anything else!
2

Sedov,

Scotland 23/07/2008 12:53:48
#1 A" Its called the free market" what free market? - the British tax payer who is paying a fortune to bail out Northern rock should be told about this stratling piece of news. The market wants it both ways. Non intervention by the government when they want to do as they please and make massive profits because of their greed and government intervention by way of the tax payer when the so called "free market" goes pear shaped.
3

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

23/07/2008 19:53:11
Every credit bubble in history has seen short-sellers blamed when the bust comes. It's just another way of prolonging the denial.

If short-sellers were as effective as claimed, they'd have been able to prevent the bubble in the first place.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.