Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Swimmers plucked to safety as ship crosses race

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 September 2009
SWIMMERS braving the icy waters of the Firth of Forth were forced to dodge a ship as it unexpectedly crossed their path during the estuary's annual race.
Onlookers watched in disbelief as the vessel made its way through the route of the Forth Swim on Sunday – even though boats were apparently meant to be banned from travelling for the hour of the event.

Jacqueline Farrell, whose 12-year-old daughter Autumn was among the swimmers heading from South to North Queensferry, was watching from the shore.

The Livingston mother said: "The ship was heading out to the sea and it was massive. It should not have been crossing. We were saying, 'There's a ship!' as it started to sound its horn."

Event organiser Andrea Gellan added: "We were taken aback, but Forth Ports have said they are now investigating. It should not have been there."

Of the 28 swimmers in the event – which began just after 4:30pm – four had already made it past the line of the boat as it arrived, allowing them to complete the race uninterrupted. But Autumn, a pupil at Livingston's St Margaret's Academy and a member of the Fauldhouse Penguins swimming club, was in fifth position and taken out of the water by safety crews who arrived quickly in boats and canoes to stop swimmers from crossing the path of the ship. Her mother, 42, said: "She was in the boat for about two minutes and then she jumped back in the water to finish the race."

The youngster, who has dreams of swimming the Channel, went on to beat her 35-minute time from last year, completing the race in 32 minutes and 50 seconds, despite losing her goggles on the way and being stung by jelly fish. The race was won by Aaron Sievewright, 15, also from her club.

Ms Gellan, who has swum the Channel herself, said: "Potentially, this boat could have been a problem, but we did have lots of safety measures in place."

A spokesman for Forth Ports insisted event organisers were told about all shipping movements on Sunday afternoon.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 September 2009 10:02 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Ports
 
1

bertiblunt,

08/09/2009 12:02:23
what a load of ship
2

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 08/09/2009 12:02:29
Very lucky swimmers, to get out of the water without any mishap is great.
3

el lebowski grande,

08/09/2009 12:15:15
Can anyone British organise anything properly? What an irritating story.
4

Jaco Pastorius,

08/09/2009 12:26:07
Quality, quality, quality! A top-rate story! Future generations of historians, etc.
5

Chris,

Edinburgh 08/09/2009 12:59:25
"...even though boats were apparently meant to be banned from travelling for the hour of the event." Really? That is not usually the case. Organisers are told of expected shipping movements but are also warned that the timetable for such movements may change and that they should keep in contact with Forth Navigation Service before and during their event. Unfortunately sometimes they fail to comply and this can be the result. So, did the organisers communicate, or did someone interpret the permission as giving their event priority over shipping operating in a restricted navigable channel?
6

Ecto,

08/09/2009 13:05:34
Surely in a working waterway i.e the Forth the boat had every right to be there and theswimmers did not
7

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 08/09/2009 13:06:59
Apparerntly the boat was being skippered by Octane Heid who said "Bluddy swimmers!" and put his foot down.
8

Ecto,

08/09/2009 13:18:45
I think dodge the 300,000 ton boat is a much better sport than swimming across the forth in anycase, you could take bets on who makes it back and who doesn't.
9

Frontshot,

Edinburgh 08/09/2009 13:19:47
If wee Autumn dreams of swimming the Channel, she'd better get used to being run down by ships....
10

,

08/09/2009 14:09:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

watcher,

Edinburgh 08/09/2009 14:40:30
All ships report into Forth Navigation with their destination when they leave harbour.
12

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 08/09/2009 14:42:30
#5 absolutely - do the muppets who organise these 'events' in a working environment have any idea of the stopping/turning capability of a large ship (not a 'boat', EEN!) far less the commercial implications of delaying sailing for an hour while they have their little games? What next - Hopscotch on the M8?
Loved the 'Livingston mother' saying "There's a ship! as it started to sound its horn", though - yes, that's pretty much what you WOULD say!!
13

Jaco Pastorius,

08/09/2009 15:18:45
Let me tell you one thing about Aaron Sievewright: when that photo was taken he was probably so cold that his plums retracted so far he couldn't see them.

It's not funny.
14

Love for CrIcKeT HaTe for NoNe,

down south 08/09/2009 16:15:52
i blame the SNP
15

kenny spowart florida,

lutz 08/09/2009 16:59:13
why not use dalry pool.
16

Foonlieson,

St Abbs 08/09/2009 18:22:44
Looks like the ship could have been the Vos Vedette.

http://www.aisliverpool.org.uk/historymap.php?map=Leith&hh=16&mm=30&date=20090906

17

Foonlieson,

08/09/2009 18:25:11
Or maybe the Border Thistle?

http://www.aisliverpool.org.uk/historymap.php?map=Leith&hh=17&mm=0&date=20090906
18

Foonlieson,

St Abbs 08/09/2009 18:28:51
The Ship was heading out to sea. So it was the "Border Thistle". Here is the AIS log: http://www.aisliverpool.org.uk/historymap.php?map=Leith&hh=17&mm=0&date=20090906

Here is a picture: http://www.ship-photographs.com/USERIMAGES/PICT0569_edited.JPG



19

,

08/09/2009 19:46:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

tumshie heid,

08/09/2009 23:24:46
A ship in a shipping lane, how inconvenient for the swimmers. They could have improvised and had a surfing competition instead using the ships wake.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.