Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Subsidy trading on the wane?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 May 2008
REFORMS of the Common Agricultural Policy mean it is now possible to trade "entitlements" to the new single farm payment.
Currently £450 million of subsidy goes into the farming industry each year. Its allocation is based on farming activity in the qualifying years of 2000-3.

Those who have moved out of farming recently, the so-called slipper brigade, can sell t
heir entitlements. They can be bought by other farmers who wish to beef up their support income or they can attract the attention of financial speculators.

In an analysis of entitlement trading over the past year, property services firm Savills has concluded that the return for those investing in entitlements has been about 20 per cent, but that has been largely boosted by the current strength of the euro.

One area of entitlement trading that is now closing down relates to payments for set-aside land. From next year, there will be no set-aside in Europe, but for those who bought last year, Savills reckons the capital value of these rights had been boosted.

There is one slightly good piece of news for taxpayers who may not understand just how this particular piece of financial manoeuvring has much to do with the profitability or otherwise of farming.

That is a promise by the European Commissioner for agriculture to perform a "health check" on the reform of farming policy, the conclusions of which are due later this month.

If nothing changes at this point, there will probably be a gradual run-down in trading of entitlements and profitability in the run-up to the next major shift of policies in the Cap, which comes in 2013.





The full article contains 282 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 06 May 2008 9:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 07/05/2008 08:15:51
Few incorrect facts here.

The reference period for Scotland SFP (we took a historical approach as apposed to Englands area based one and NI's hybrid one) is 2000 to 2002 not 2003.

People have been trading entitlments since 2005 (as appossed to the journos 'now possible to trade').

They usually go for about 2.5 times thier face value which means they need to be held onto for around 3 years before they have paid for themselves.

The entitlments are not ring fenced. Meaning a crofter in Lewis can buy entitlements from an arable farmer in the Lothians.

The tax paid into CAP by us far outweighs what we get back i.e. we are a NET contributor to CAP (about a third of CAP goes to France, the UK takes around 6% the rest is divided amongst the remaining EU states)

Many of the "slipper brigade" hang onto the entitlements (they belong to the person, not the farm) and use them on "naked acres".

Scottish agriculture alone generates £2.5 billion pounds for the GDP of Scotland. It is reckoned that the countryside of Scotland generates around £17 billion in total (i.e. tourists looking at our countryside, off road stuff, hiking/biking etc).

Trading will end in 2010 I reckon and this is not a new idea. Farmers have being trading any quota for years, just like the fishing boys.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.