Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Lochhead calls for 'new farming contract'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 January 2009
RICHARD Lochhead called for a "new contract" between farmers and the community yesterday as he became the first Scottish minister to speak at the prestigious Oxford Farming Conference since devolution.
Lochhead made it clear to the 500 delegates that, in contrast to his Westminter peers, he is convinced cash spent supporting farming is a sound investment – provided producers deliver environmental benefits for the wider community.

Food product
ion in Scotland is currently valued at £7.5 billion a year, with the Scottish Government determined to see this increase to at least £10bn by 2017.

At present Scottish agriculture receives direct support of more than £450 million a year.

Lochhead said: "Farmers gather here against a background of economic uncertainty, but I believe that the Scottish Government's vision for agriculture combined with the industry's reputation and skills provides hope and optimism for the future.

"What I would like to see is effectively a new contract between our society and farmers to deliver clear outcomes in the interests of Scotland. That means a contract that recognises the fundamental role of farmers and land managers in utilising Scotland's biggest asset in the public interest and then addresses specific issues through more targeted measures."

Ever since the reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy were implemented in 2005, farmers and crofters have had the security of the single farm payment cheque. The SFP replaced a wide range of previous subsidies and was based on the historical receipt of payments in the reference years of 2000-2.

Many within the industry quickly grasped the reality that even if they cut production drastically, they would still receive their SFP, as long as they kept their holdings tidy and in good order. This course of action does not sit easily with many farmers or NFU Scotland, and Lochhead now appears to have embraced the mood.

He said: "Our policy tools need to ensure that farmers will only get the payment if they actively carry out the practices that deliver economic, social and environmental benefits.

"The primary purpose of Scottish agriculture should always be food production. Given the national importance of agriculture, public support for farming is wholly justified and will be essential in the years ahead given the unique challenges faced by the industry."

The UK government has repeatedly contended that all direct support throughout the EU should be phased out as quickly as possible.

Lochhead made it clear that the SNP wants to see a greater say for Scotland in the corridors of power in Brussels.

He said: "Putting together clear, successful policies for the future will need genuine engagement by governments and stakeholders. Food is now higher on Scotland's agenda than ever before and our farmers are a vital resource in delivering food security for future generations."

Hilary Benn, the UK Environment Secretary, also addressed the conference and would no doubt have found Lochhead's line a difficult one to match.

However, Benn at least made reference to concerns over future food supplies in the face of projections that the world's population will grow from the current six billion to nine billion by 2050.

He said: "I want British agriculture to produce as much food as possible. No ifs, no buts. We could produce more fruit and vegetables here in the UK – the market is there, so what is holding us back? If there is a demand then production should follow."

John Scott MSP, a farmer and the Tory spokesman on rural affairs, was broadly supportive of Lochhead's comments, but with a caveat.

He said: "He must, however, ensure that his warm words are backed up by concrete measures to substantially reduce the regulatory burden on farmers and so free them up to do what they do best, namely producing food."



The full article contains 629 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 January 2009 10:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Organic peasant,

N E Scotland 07/01/2009 08:20:27
I do welcome Mr Lochheads words but it really is time for action now. SFP needs to be tied to those actually delivering something not paid to the dead, retired or emigrated. SRDP is not working and LFASS is a very sick joke. Farming is vital to Scotland, it is dying and still nothing has been done.
2

Morry,

Scotland 07/01/2009 11:43:09
John Scott, Msp is right, farmers should have the red tape cut,
the rules should be relaxed where farmers can sell their produce from their farms,
Richard Lochhead is full of bright ideas and strong words but I still don't believe he is particularly suited to rural affairs.
And still we await our SFP and without reason for withholding either, Mr. Lochhead should in my opinion sort out one department before taking on the whole country.
3

Wee Shooie,

Scotland 07/01/2009 23:16:33
'Farmers gather here against a background of economic uncertainty' With these wise words from Richard Lochead , how can a rise in farm rent be justfied . Obviously some well heeled people do not live in the real farming world .
4

Voice of the mysterons,

Mars 08/01/2009 18:27:23
What red tape are we talking about here? The red tape (or controls) surrounding the applications for payments under SFP or LFASS -We want the money but not the conditions. Or the red tape around health and safety on farms and food production. Farmers, we gave you Mad Cow disease and salmonella in eggs because our profits from subsidy schemes werent good enough?
5

bumpkin,

08/01/2009 23:21:05
the biggest boost to production would have come from giving the tenants the right to buy their farms, thereby giving them the incentive to invest.

since lochhead has ruled that out, the feudal timewarp continues.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.