Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Ethical food revolution picks up pace with 62% rise

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
13 October 2006
CONSUMERS are increasingly allowing their consciences to do the shopping - to the tune of £2 billion a year.
Spending on ethically produced food, such as Fairtrade, organic and free-range produce, has risen by 62 per cent in four years, a report shows today.

Analysts Mintel say sales of Fairtrade goods are expected to soar this year by nearly one-fifth from £195 million last year.

And there seems no prospect of a halt in sales. Over the next five years, a further 138 per cent growth is predicted, to £547 million.

But as the "ethical food" revolution gathers pace and more products are launched, critics are starting to question how ethical it really is.

With supermarkets and European manufacturers creaming off much of the profit, critics claim little money goes to those it is supposed to help.

Mintel says that with growing affluence, price is becoming less important for British shoppers, who are increasingly willing to pay a premium for ethically produced fare.

In 2002, just 25 "ethical" food products were launched. By last year this had shot up to 70 and Mintel says there have been a further 53 so far this year, led by beverages.

Julie Sloan, a senior market analyst at Mintel, said: "Ethical food suppliers have traded on the fringes of the UK grocery market for many years and until recently only a few sectors, such as free-range eggs, had really established themselves.

"But now many more ethical products have entered the mainstream foods sector, with leading suppliers and retailers becoming increasingly involved."

Their rapid growth is reflected in changing consumer attitudes, according to a Mintel survey of 1,000 people. More than one-third buy Fairtrade "where available", compared to just over a quarter in 2002.

Free-range produce is even more popular, with 40 per cent of those questioned choosing such products "whenever they can" - up from one third.

The ethical sector ranges from produce from farmers' markets to the RSPCA's Freedom Food scheme.

The Fairtrade Foundation, which was set up charities such as Oxfam and Christian Aid, said sales of Fairtrade products had tripled since it was set up in 2002.

Barbara Crowther, its spokeswoman, said: "Mintel's latest insights confirm what we are experiencing on a daily basis - rapidly growing consumer and business interest in Fairtrade and wider ethical food shopping. This shows no signs of abating, and is also moving beyond the food sector."

Supermarkets report booming sales of "ethical" food.

Sainsbury's, which claims to be Britain's "favourite Fairtrade retailer", commands 32 per cent of the market, with 80 lines.

Waitrose said ethical trading was "at the cornerstone" of its business, and it was part of the John Lewis Partnership's constitution.

However, critics argue that Fairtrade distorts free markets, encouraging farmers to stay in unprofitable sectors, and causing oversupply which pushes down prices for other traders.

They also point out that farmers only sell the raw products - such as coffee and cocoa beans - and the lucrative processing and packaging of jars of coffee and chocolate bars is often reaped by European firms.

Payments are also made to co-operatives rather than individual producers, which often ends up going to the banks to pay off the groups' debts.

Philip Oppenheim, a former Conservative trade minister, has accused the supermarkets of cashing in by charging premium prices for Fairtrade goods.

He said while the movement is supposed to pay above-market prices to farmers in developing countries, local producers ended up with only a "minuscule sliver" of the extra price paid by consumers for Fairtrade products.

Good taste?


The most popular Fairtrade products last year were:

1. Coffee - 34 per cent of total UK Fairtrade sales volume
2. Bananas and other fruit - 28 per cent
3. Chocolate - 9 per cent
4. Tea - 8 per cent
5. Sugar - 5 per cent
6. Wine - 3 per cent
7. Cocoa - 2 per cent
8. Other - 10 per cent

Pros


5 million

farmers, workers and their families, 548 producer organisations and more than 650 traders benefit from the Fairtrade labelling network

Income from Fairtrade funds clean drinking water, new schools, educational scholarships, sickness benefits and organic conversion schemes.

£50m

has been given back to producers across the globe in Fairtrade sales, which have reached £500m across the 20 consumer countries in the network.

Fairtrade products have been extended to yoghurt, herbs and spices, brazil nuts and roasted salted peanuts, raisins and avocados.

Cafédirect - a Fairtrade brand - is now the sixth largest coffee in the UK.

1,500

products from 212 companies are now certified by the Fairtrade Foundation

Teadirect is Britain's fastest-growing tea brand and the eighth largest in the market.

150

towns in Britain are using and promoting Fairtrade products, along with some 2,000 Fairtrade churches and 22 Fairtrade universities.

Paying a higher Fairtrade price gives farmers the option to invest in quality improvements and gain access to speciality markets or diversify into other crops to reduce their dependence on crops such as coffee.

One in four

of the two million kg of bananas sold by Sainsbury's every week is Fairtrade, and they are frequently among its top 20 top sellers. Sainsbury's sells more than one third of Britain's Fairtrade bananas.

Fairtrade is based on a clear set of internationally-agreed criteria, which are independently assessed and monitored, and the whole system is open and transparent.

Fairtrade says coffee producers earn about twice the world price, while consumers pay only 10-15 per cent more.

£1bn

is spent on organic produce in the UK every year, making it the third biggest organic market in the world and accounting for one seventh of total farming.

Cons


98%

of Fairtrade chocolate is manufactured and packaged in Europe. Only 8.5p of a £1.70 bar of Fairtrade chocolate remains in the country of origin.

Critics calculate Fairtrade producers would be better off if consumers bought regular products, not Fairtrade ones, and gave the difference to a development charity.

12p

per pack of coffee is the additional income a farmer gets through the Fairtrade brand. But the typical UK supermarket shopper pays 75p extra compared to other brands.

The cost of buying and shipping Fairtrade bananas from the Windward Islands to the UK is 55p per kg, but they are sold on to the supermarkets for 95p per kg.

30%

higher prices are paid by British shoppers for coffee than in other European countries, despite Britain being a major importer of Fairtrade coffee

Divine chocolate, promoted as "chocolate with a heart", is only one-third owned by farmers.

4p

of the extra £1 cost of a bag of Fairtrade bananas compared to other bananas gets back to the farmer.

Fairtrade subsidies encourage overproduction, just as the Common Agricultural Policy has done in the EU. But in the global coffee market, the central problem is oversupply, which forces down prices for all regular producers.

1/3

more land is required to farm free-range produce than conventional techniques.

Fairtrade is no guarantee of quality. The beans offered by Fairtrade are often far from being the best available. This is because Fairtrade products come from peasant farmers, who don't have the cash to improve quality.

3p

extra is all the farmer gets per 227g pack of coffee beans when purchased at the Fairtrade guaranteed price of 72p per lb.

Critics say fair trade is bad for economic development in the long run. Fairtrade subsidies keep peasant producers, especially in Africa, tied to small-scale, inefficient farming methods when these countries need large-scale, mechanised agriculture.

Fairtrade agreements often favour one group of farmers over another. For instance, it discriminates against the major, low-cost, highly mechanised plantations of Brazil and Vietnam.

20%

fewer crops are produced by organic farming in the same amount of land as conventional production.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2006 12:38 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Fair trade
 
1

Androsthenes,

Edinburgh 13/10/2006 01:45:25

This article is a bit confusing as it manages to conflate fairtrade,organic and free-range as if they're somehow connected.The adjective "ethically produced" is just drivel.
Faretrade means the producers gets a guaranteed price for their crops sparing them the vagaries of a volatile market thus promoting financial stability.As noted above -under CONS...this has led to rampant profiteering by ,for example ,Sainsbury which was charging 45p more per kilo for fairtrade bananas than for US multinational slave company bananas. Since the producers weren't getting the extra 45p it just meant fatter profits for Sainsbury.
Organic and free range are what it says on the packet-in theory.....
I remember getting a head of organic broccoli from ASDA which contained 5 live caterpillars so the "no pesticides" part was true!
The article is correct in that some fairtrade products aren't v good-for example the fastest growing teabrand-Teadirect- is startlingly vile,Clipper is better.

2

scottwebb,

13/10/2006 02:27:01

People are starting to wake up to the fact that one of the major causes of illnesses is what their eating. The food industry has a lot to answer for and is losing the trust of the public at large. More and more people are going Organic and locally grown produce is now becoming an attractive alternative to what were getting out of the supermarkets who lets face it have been very slow to react.
When you think about it, it makes you realise just how much of what we eat has been chemically treated or GM modified, when you really are pushed for choice in any of the supermarkets when it comes to Organic.
There is a reason why so many people have been dropping like flies with diabetes and its time for change

3

Malky,

Vancouver 13/10/2006 03:56:49

Hey Guys,

As an ex-pat Scot i can say that here in Vancouver they are and have been big into this kind of thing for a long long time and the product ranges are huge and the quality of them fantastic, superior.

It doesn't surprise me that the ASDA supplier was poor quality, it really doesn't.

I'd like to see a retunr of the small specialist shops in the UK with good quality high value produce and to hell with the supermarkets.

4

scottwebb,

13/10/2006 05:45:49

Agreed Dave, i think there is a real need for the shops you described, in fact the promotion of fruit and veg markets and local produce would be a major step forward

5

SouthernSkye,

Isle of Skye 13/10/2006 06:01:31

Still the most important information is missing from food stuffs.....Food Miles.
This should be placed on all produce to so you can see how far your tatties have travelled before getting packed at the supermarket warehouse and how far the fresh fish has been carted around in trucks before you get to eat it!
The you can chose environmentaly friendly foods that are from your local area. This would also boost the trade of local growers and producers to help your local economy.

6

Malky,

13/10/2006 06:17:51

#5 - Great idea. Also, It wouldn't half scunner the supermarkets who are shipping you in Polish tomatoes at the moment.

7

Andyfromedinburgh,

Edinburgh 13/10/2006 06:26:10

Contrary to the Oppenheimer view, Fairtrade certification is part of a succesful market. Willing buyers and willing sellers. Consumers who care meeting the needs of producers in need more directly and sustainably than charity which is unsustainable and patronising. Without margins there would have been no room for the first wave of social entrepreneurs to create viable companies.

As for small shops vs supermarkets, the first to take this into the heart of their business in the UK were independent natural food retailers and wholesalers back in the late 1980's. Without their support Fairtrade would not have taken off.

Fairtrade does not claim to change distributors only utilise them (as part of a market ) for marginaised farmers. rather than criticise fairtrade, I would urge people to become part of the vibrant small shop sector in the UK. USE IT!

Of course marginalised farmers don't have the cash or security to invest in quality on their own. That is why Fairtrade works best through democratic organisations controlled by farmers to do just that. The difficulty is that markets want returns on shorter time frames so bigger customers will go to well capaitalised estates even if part of the costs is then redistributed to give workers more security. Fairtrade needs stronger standards to encourage licensees to invest in more with small farmers. Turning criticism of short term PR halos into real long term investment for farmers rather than shareholders.

Given that this large and growing market was created by an alliance of civil society campaigners and entrepreneurs, I think detractors should get off their backside, take some business risks and create a similar market that became part of the solution to climate change too.

8

Stuart,

London 13/10/2006 07:47:39

I find it amazing that Sainsbury's profess to be Britain's favourite fairtrade retailer...

Once again, the Co-operative Societies have been overshadowed by the corporate desire to stick themselves in front of the populous to take away the fact that the Co-op have supported this for many many years, prior to the big 5 getting on the band wagon...

The same applies to corporate responsibility, bio-degradeable plastic bags, food labelling and ethical trading...

The Co-op have the most advanced in-store media offering in the marketplace, and Europe's largest customer facing screen advertising network, (and again, Tesco have stolen the limelight, simply because they are more conscious of a bite-size PR stunt, rather than long term investment in customer communication).

I am delighted that recent press reports are far more supportive of the Co-op and the massive advancements made in their business of late.

9

What do you mean my chosen name is not available?,

13/10/2006 07:58:25

I agree food miles is a major issue. An extraordinary statistic for you: Germany exports 60 million tonnes of potatoes per year. Not too remarkable, until you discover that Germany imports 60 million tonnes of potatoes per year.

Global markets create local problems.

10

Paul Voltaire,

13/10/2006 07:58:57

I have stopped eating oranges as a protest at Israeli
aggression towards Lebanon.
Am I ethical?

11

The Beefeater,

13/10/2006 08:36:28

The target of supermarkets is to exploit. If as in Fairtrade they supposedly can't exploit the producer they turn to exploit the consumer who is willing to pay more. Its high time their racketeering was stopped and profits were at sensible levels. However the government are unlikely to want that because higher profits mean more taxes.

12

Annabel,

London 13/10/2006 08:55:46

I think Supermarkets are all doing their bit to respond to the demand of the consumer. On Wednesday, M&S won an RSPCA Good Business Award for its commitment to achievng high standards of animal welfare.

13

Andrew,

Aberdeen 13/10/2006 09:01:04

Spot on Stuart - the Co-op had all their own coffee and chocolate switched to Fairtrade years before M&S but forgot to tell anybody!

I shop there as much as possible on principle. The big boys are jumping on the bandwagon as it's the big thing just now, but they have the power to make a really big difference if they really wanted to.

I sincerely hope that the Co-op can increase market share again on the back of their genuine efforts to improve the world.

14

Jeremy,

13/10/2006 09:50:07

Barry 10 - I don't know if you're ethical for not eating Israeli fruit - isn't that aggression over?. I wonder if you're consistent, though. Do you buy Chinese clothing, shoes, and electrical goods in the light of that country's aggression towards Tibet and support of the genocide in Darfur? Do you disdain Iranian oil in the light of their imperialist manoeuvrings in the Middle East? There are Ethiopian soldiers in Somalia - do you turn up your nose at stuff from that country?

15

ChrisA,

13/10/2006 11:21:29

As fairtrade, organic and ethical produce becomes more popular what is being done to prevent retailers from slapping a label on ordinary stuff then selling it at inflated prices.

16

Neil,

9% GROWTH Party 13/10/2006 12:56:12

"This article is a bit confusing as it manages to conflate fairtrade,organic and free-range as if they're somehow connected.The adjective "ethically produced" is just drivel."

In theory you are right but in practice you are wrong Peter (1).

Fairtrade & organic are both marketing labels signifying goods which are in no way better (either for you or producers) than those without the "green" marketeers behind them. Its all smoke & mirrors.

See, for example, the story about the "organic" farmer who wiped out a small loch with non-organic sheepdip.

17

DannyL,

North Wales 13/10/2006 13:40:20

The whole concept of Fair Trade is nothing more than a sop to the conscience of the supermarket mentality of having someone elses cake and letting it go stale instead of eating it because you can. I am sick of reading how Luiz wants a fair price for his bananas when my frien Glyn up the road is getting screwed by restrictive milk pricing.

18

JG,

Fife 13/10/2006 19:13:42

You still can't beat Cadbury's!

19

freetalkscotland,

14/10/2006 07:39:13

Whilst recognising the argument in #1 and others that the fair trade and the organic sectors are two completely different elements of the market, the reality is that consumer demand IS changing towards those products which have a positive social benefit - and that consumers are prepared to pay the price for it.

Long may it continue.

________________
join freetalkscotland - Scotland's leading forum for serious discussion and light chat

20

ANNE,

North West England 14/10/2006 18:05:35

The problem with eating locally produced food is the area in which the food is produced, ok for those of you in a comparitively clean air and fields sort of area but would YOU want to breathe the air then also have to drink the milk, eat the meat, eggs and veg produced in the zone around an oil refinery, plus most other filthy industries you could think of and any the government may wish to force on us in the future, containing all the dioxins contained in the fallout!

21

Pender Paul,

Canada 15/10/2006 06:28:51

I think that this is just one more example of the shift in consumer spending based on folks wanting to take the 'moral high road', and thank goodness for that. Now, if we can just get theses same folk to start demanding that government pension plans and related government investments follow a socially responsible path we just might start to make a difference in the lives of producers worldwide. And yes, I buy 'fair trade' whenever I can, even though it costs a little more.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.