Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Waste depot rejection: 'Few people want 200 lorries a day on their streets'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

WITH over 700 objections it is hardly surprising that city councillors have blocked the construction of a massive waste depot at Portobello.
With a track record of heeding local objections in the face of official advice, such strong opposition was unlikely to be ignored but on this occasion there was more to the residents' anger than just pure nimbyism.

Of course, those who campaigned
so vigorously against the proposal did not want it on their doorsteps, but few people would welcome two hundred lorries a day thundering through their streets and the prospect of both noise and smell pollution from the operation. It's a perfectly understandable reaction when many of those who objected commonly have their nostrils filled with the stench from the nearby Seafield sewage plant.

And while Viridor has argued that transporting the millions of tonnes of commercial waste it collects by train rather than by road to Dunbar would have reduced its CO2 emissions by more than 42 per cent, this would have been over a large geographical area, with traffic movements in the Portobello area leading to higher levels of pollution locally.

It is understandable from the company's point of view that they deemed the former rail yard to be an ideal site for the £7 million project, located as it is in land primarily zoned for industrial use. But the problem is that its fleet of lorries would have to pass through densely populated areas to reach it.

It must have been tempting for councillors, though, to look sympathetically at the application considering the position they face regarding future plans for the disposal of their own waste. After being collected by the council refuse fleet it currently goes by rail from the ageing Powderhall facility to Dunbar under contract by Viridor. But that must change.

Powderhall, already well past its shelf life, is due to close in 2015 and by then the council will have to comply with EU directives which require a greater amount of household waste to be incinerated. Although an incineration facility will be required in the near future, such was the size of the proposed Portobello depot that a proportion of waste currently routed through Powderhall could have been handled there too, solving at least part of its problem.

But for the moment campaigners will see this decision as a victory for common sense, while Viridor will have to come up with more compelling arguments if it hopes to successfully appeal yesterday's overwhelming rejection of their plans.





The full article contains 429 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 July 2008 8:28 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

Grumpy,

31/07/2008 12:16:16
Why not build the site at Ocean Terminal and ship the stuff to Dunbar? The present rail capacity might find it hard to cope, but you could get 1,000 train loads on a relatively small ship - and the ship-loaders could get a tram to work too!
2

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 31/07/2008 12:43:04
The site is on the A1 road, so there will hardly be 200 lorries a day going past peoples doorsteps.
I lived near powderhall for 9 years and hardly noticed the bin vehicles and there was certainly no smell.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.