Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Builders see red over lack of greenbelt development



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 September 2008
A PUBLIC inquiry into how Edinburgh will develop over the next decade got under way today – with house builders launching an attack on the city's greenbelt.
Several organisations, including Miller Homes, Taylor Wimpey and Edinburgh Zoo, are bidding to overturn the council's stand against development on areas of open space.

The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, which owns the city's zoo, is mountin
g a campaign to win support for the sell-off of part of Corstorphine Hill for housing, which would allow it to fund a world-class visitor attraction.

Opposition to the sale of land at Meadowbank Stadium and plans to build a new high school on Portobello Park are also likely to dominate proceedings.

The "city local plan" lays down the rules governing how the Capital will be allowed to develop between now and 2015.

Two Government reporters have been assigned to hear the arguments over ten weeks at the City Chambers. They will then make public recommendations, although the council is not duty bound to adopt them.

City planing leader Jim Lowrie said today: "How we develop the city in future years is of great interest to many people.

"Given the interest in the process, a public inquiry is the fairest way to ensure that we have taken into account the issues that have been raised and that these have been independently assessed."

At the last count, the objections covered 182 separate issues. Most topics will be covered by written submissions, but more complex issues will be dealt with at "round table" hearing sessions.

The first week will focus on the future of land at Newcraighall and Woodhall Mains, before the controversial future of land at Liberton Drive is revisited next week.

Portobello Park will be discussed in late October, and the Royal Zoological Society's argument will be heard in December.

Chief executive David Windmill said: "The future of Edinburgh Zoo depends upon our providing an exciting and inspiring day out for our visitors.

"This takes money, and lots of it. This is why the society needs to raise substantial sums of money by developing some surplus land along the western boundary of the zoo. If we are not successful, it is a serious matter for the society and, dare I suggest, the city of Edinburgh."

Meadowbank campaigners hope public support to save the stadium will put pressure on the council to scrap its demolition plans. Save Meadowbank spokesman Kevin Connor said campaigners had gathered 1600 objections.

Blair Melville, head of planning strategy at Homes for Scotland – which represents the housebuilding sector – was due to speak at the inquiry today.

"House prices in Edinburgh are a key measure of demand and remain among the highest in Scotland," he said. "Conversely, as the council has stated, there is a serious shortage of affordable housing. The shortage of land for housing has driven up prices, and helped drive low and middle-income households out of Edinburgh."

POTENTIAL HOUSING SITES
Greenbelt sites identified by developers for housing include:

• Land at Woodhall Mains. Plans by Boyack Homes to build on a 62-hectare site.

• Plans for a housing scheme on land at Gilmerton Gardens and Liberton Drive by Cruden Homes.

• Plans for housing on land at Burdiehouse, by Hallam Land Management.

• Plans for new housing on land at nos 2-8 and to the south of West Bowling Green Street by Martin & Son.

• Plans for a housing development at Winton Loan, near Juniper Green by Miller.

• New housing on land "immediately to the east of the steadings at Brunstane", near Musselburgh, by South Castle Properties.

• Plans for 650 homes on farmland which is near Edinburgh Airport by West Craigs Ltd.







The full article contains 624 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 September 2008 10:43 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh planning issues
 
1

allknowing,

23/09/2008 12:02:33
They dont need greenbelt land.

Bulldoze all the slums (Pilton, Wester Hailes, Niddrie etc) and then you have all the space you need.

Plus there are lots of brown field sites in Edinburgh still empty.
2

ccc,

23/09/2008 12:03:20
Correct me if I am wrong but aren't most of Edinburgh's EXISTING housing developments canned at present due to a lack of demand....

Not saying that there is not a demand for new housing in the future. However the currect situation would tell someone with a brain that the present 'housing shortgage' may not be as clear cut as some say.

Doesn't seem to be a huge shortage as far as I can see. Only problem are the prices. Which are coming down day by day.
3

Pond Hall,

23/09/2008 12:06:01
Should be Grey for Concrete

Its all about profit, nothing else
4

Pond Hall,

23/09/2008 12:08:45
Why is this needed when they are talking about a development at Leith Docks, that will virtually be the size of new town.

Look at Down south, they Concreted over "flood plains" - Green Spaces - then wondered why they had so much problems with flooding
5

Brad,

Glasgow 23/09/2008 12:17:21
Half of Edinburgh's new houses are being in Fife, West Lothian, etc. The greenbelt should be loosened - otherwise the expansion will keep spilling over the other side.
6

alex paterson,

edinburgh 23/09/2008 12:31:31
Stuff the greedy builders lets keep the greenbelt for as long as possible,it is far more attractive than concrete jungles.
7

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 23/09/2008 12:36:31
Once greenland is lost to housing, it is lost forever.
Unless there is a nuclear war, then that's different.
8

Hector the Red,

23/09/2008 12:37:56
#1 you forgot Muirhouse, Craigmillar, The Inch, Sighthill, Leith & Gorgie!
9

Hector the Red,

23/09/2008 12:38:12
#1 you forgot Muirhouse, Craigmillar, The Inch, Sighthill, Leith & Gorgie!
10

blackley,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 13:39:52
It's frightening that there are developers standing by ready to build on our green belt purely in the name of quick profit and with no regard whatsoever for our quality of life.
11

jdships,

23/09/2008 14:35:40
Surely if the Leith Docks developement was "project managed" properly then the needs of all aspects of local housing requirements could be satisified.
Ah but wait a minute this is Forth Ports we are talking about !!
End of
12

The Judge,

23/09/2008 14:47:52
The councils favourite developer Applecross bought up huge chunks of the greenbelt on the south of the city a few years ago. It doesn't matter what we think the greenbelt will be no more in a few years or so.

13

J4cko,

23/09/2008 15:01:57
Why do developers think it is their sole right to build houses on any land that may be available. It is for their own profit and the average family cannot afford these 5 bedroomed houses. It's not your land its the people of Edinburgh's, keep off it.
14

Randan,

23/09/2008 15:05:54
It was not so long ago a thread like this would have been full of people saying get rid of the green belt, and that developers need to make money.
Where have they all gone?
15

The Judge,

23/09/2008 15:41:33
#13 It is not our land, most of the greenbelt is owned by a few wealthy landowners, Duke of Buccleuch and the like.

Even when the city council do buy up a bit of the greenbelt often they sell it for development. A prime example is when Donald Anderson spent £30m of our money on land next to The Wisp, it was later sold off to developers by the back door.

Developers have the whip hand in Edinburgh, they know the city needs them to pay for the TramLINE to no-where and will get away with anything they like for the next few decades.
16

ejstubbs,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 15:47:33
Winton Loan is hardly "near Juniper Green". I know, because it's round the corner from where I live, and that ain't Juniper Green by any stretch of the imagination. That's either down to poor fact-checking by the EEN reporter, or a wanton disregard for the actual layout of the city. Makes me question the accuracy of the rest of that bit of the story.
17

Wild about woods,

Ratho Station 23/09/2008 15:49:16
At last more and more people are saying that the Greenbelt is valuable to them, to us all. Developers see Greenspace exclusively as an opportunity to make money, they have no interest in providing "affordable housing" other than allow them to build highly profitable, huge houses for the wealthy on the major part of each site. I support the Council Planners in their attempt to defend our Greenbelt, let the SG Reporters take note!
18

Drat,

Edinburgh 23/09/2008 22:12:45
West Bowling Green Street is never Green Belt by any stretch of the imagination.
19

Julian.,

edinburgh 23/09/2008 23:19:58
#14 Randan,

Can't ever remember a time when people on these forums were sticking up for developers need to make money...except maybe developers.

As many have said, there's plenty land down at Granton/Newhaven/Leith for these people to build houses. In fact we need them down there now to takeover from those who have pulled out.
20

Nik80,

Edinburgh 24/09/2008 13:22:05
The issue with the land which is being allocated by the council down in granton, newhaven etc it is reclaimed land and therefore there is the possibility of flooding also the council as our inspirational leaders have masterplanned the whole area for up to 20+ storey 2 bed flats and townhouses. It is not the developers who want to build this type of house it is the councils forcing them down the route. As these plans have now been bought into and adopted as policy by the Council there is no real opportunity to ammend them. By building on the greenbelt land it gives the opportunity to respond to what people want a house with a back and front garden.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is a Government watchdog right to criticise the planned new hotel on Princes Street?
Yes, it’s totally out of keeping with the setting
No, we need some fresh ideas in the city centre
It’s no worse than a lot of the buildings there already

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.