Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Don't panic' plea from worried Scottish giants after B&B crisis



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 June 2008
Bradford & Bingley's shock losses and rights issue rethink helped to wipe £4bn off UK bank shares
ROYAL Bank of Scotland and HBOS issued what amounted to "don't panic" pleas over their £12 billion and £4bn respective rights issues yesterday following the crisis which engulfed rival Bradford & Bingley.

More than £4bn was slashed from banking shares at one stage yesterday as B&B, a major player in the buy-to-let (BTL) mortgage market, announced a surprise redrawing of its own £300 million cash call on shareholders.

It also revealed £8m of losses in the first four months of 2008, compared with a £107m profit in the same period last year, which the under-pressure bank blamed on mortgage condition continuing to worsen.

B&B's action shocked the market and prompted both RBS and HBOS to clarify their own rights issue positions.

In a brief statement, RBS said: "In response to inquiries received, RBS notes that UK buy-to-let mortgages are only 1 per cent of RBS's UK loan portfolio."

Roughly 60 per cent of B&B's mortgage book is in BTL, sometimes seen as a riskier sector in downturns.

RBS also said that its trading guidance released on 22 April, just before the rights issue was announced, "remained appropriate".

HBOS, the Bank of Scotland/Halifax group, said that its rights issue was "proceeding according to plan". It added that trading remained "satisfactory".

HBOS said later that 26.8 per cent of its mortgage book was attributable to "specialist balances", mainly buy-to-let and self-certification mortgages.

RBS weathered the initial storm, but despite the reassurances, HBOS shares were badly hit, losing 10 per cent, or 40p, to 360p. The Edinburgh-based bank is issuing new shares at 275p.

Simon Willis, a banking analyst at NCB Stockbrokers, said: "The most obvious read-across from Bradford & Bingley was HBOS, because it is the second biggest player in buy-to-let.

"The question has already been around as to whether the £4bn being raised by HBOS is enough, and B&B's problems will make that question more pertinent."

RBS's shares closed down 1 per cent, or 2.5p, at 226p, compared with a rights issue price of 200p.

B&B, meanwhile, saw its shares slashed 24 per cent to 67p, wiping another £130m off its already depressed stock market valuation to leave it at £407m.

B&B shook the market when it said US private equity firm TPG Capital had agreed to take a 23 per cent stake in the bank in return for £179m.

It revealed it was scaling back its rights issue as a result to £258m, or 55p a share, compared with an earlier price of 82p. B&B also confirmed chief executive Steven Crawshaw was retiring through ill-health.

buy-to-let fears, page 31


The full article contains 479 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

The REAL truth about the credit crunch.....,

West Lothian 03/06/2008 13:01:16
The headline has echoes of Mr Mainwaring in "Dad's Army"!

Frankly, HBOS is a lame duck in the midst of it's death throes. Andy Hornby would spin infinitely otherwise, however the plain truth is that their mortgage business has collapsed. If you don't believe me go into any HBOS branch in Bathgate or Linlithgow etc. and observe the clueless "Mortgage Advisors" who sit on their hands all day doing nothing.

Think very carefully before offloading your cash to this bunch.....
2

Roscoe P Coltrane,

03/06/2008 13:53:30
Hi #1

Got any evidence to back that up by any chance?

Or are you another person making big statements about something you know nothing about?
3

Sedov,

Scotland 03/06/2008 14:02:34
#1 They are all the same those "clever" people who look after our money. No doubt that the fat cats in Bradford and Bingley will still get their huge bonuses for creating more and more bits of paper with fancy names like financial instruments etc all based on selling people's debts on with dodgy security.Keep your savings under the mattress its safer.
4

Roscoe P Coltrane,

03/06/2008 14:06:56
3 - how about you? Got any evidence or do you just normally read tabloids (and the Scotsman isn't too far removed from tabloids these days) whose sole aim is to stir up controversy as that generates sales?

Glad to see so many people wishing the collapse of Scottish companies with a global reputation and who employ so many local people in the Edinburgh and Lothians area, it gladdens my heart, really does.
5

Sedov,

Scotland 03/06/2008 14:19:29
#4 Unlike you I do not tug my forelock to the establishment, that's what 50 years working for employers in the private and public sectors, including the financial sector has taught me, not the tabloids. Scotland or the world economy will not collapse just because there are Scottish companies in trouble, the take over vultures and international finance capital are never far away so do not fret yourself.
6

Roscoe P Coltrane,

03/06/2008 14:49:02
Thanks for your sage advice Sedov, but if I wanted to be patronised I'd speak to my boss.

Nice to know your 50 years experience has taught you that cash held under the matress where it will deflate in value is safer than being in a savings account where you get paid interest.

Shows how much you understand the current situation really, doesn't it? People love to take down people/companies that do well, it helps define the chips on their shoulders quite nicely.
7

Sedov,

Scotland 03/06/2008 16:02:30
You are a dour sole Roscoe, but thanks for the thanks.
8

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 03/06/2008 17:58:15
26% of the portfolio being in BtL or self-cert seems rather a lot. The key question is whether that's because they for some reason wanted to hold those mortgages in a portfolio, or because they couldn't securitise them?

If they're left holding the dross mortgages on their own books, that would be a tad worrying.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.