Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Starter' tenancies call to attract new blood

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 August 2009
FOR almost two decades few farms have been let in Scotland on a basis that would provide a degree of security to tenants. The Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act of 2003 was designed to address this situation.
Two new forms of tenancy were introduced: one with a minimum duration of 15 years and another with a maximum term of five years.

The legislation was much lauded at the time, but landlords and their agents have been very wary of entering into arr
angements that might at some future date give a tenant the absolute right to buy.

However, the Scottish Government announced last year that it has no intention of amending the act. Since 2003, estate agents have devised a series of agreements that avoid any possibility of long-term security.

They had little choice, given the fact that wrong advice could lay them open for considerable compensation as the value of a tenanted farm is in the region of 40 per cent less than the open market rate.

But the tide may be turning with five farms on the Island of Bute advertised for let as well as one near Oban and a substantial unit in the Borders.

Angus McCall, chairman of the Scottish Tenant Farmers' Association, said: "It is significant that all of the farms are livestock units andnot suitable for contract farming arrangements.

"The landowners concerned should look towards the future of farming in the Highlands and Islands, as well as other remote parts of Scotland, and choose new-entrant tenants for these farms rather than looking for the highest rent which, if left to the vagaries of the open market will inevitably come from a neighbouring or an already established farmer.

"Scottish agriculture is desperately in need of new blood, but unless new entrants are given a fair wind, they will never be able to compete for farms on the open market."

However, where an estate is in the hands of a trust, the trustees may well be bound to secure the best available return.

In May 2007 the Scottish Government pledged to make £10 million available for new entrants. The take-up has been modest because potential claimants have been unable to secure land.

A radical rethink is necessary, according to McCall: "The STFA is proposing the creation of a special starter tenancy, which in conjunction with measures included in the Scottish rural development programme will give the new entrants a competitive advantage in bidding for a tenanted farm and which will encourage landlords to let to a new entrant."

The SFTA is exploring this avenue with government officials and hopes to be able to develop this idea with other stakeholder groups over the coming weeks.

There is a view that tenant organisations are constantly at odds with landlords. There may be a few points of difference, but the reality is that they have to work together on a constructive basis.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 August 2009 7:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Dan Buglass
 
1

Morry,

Scotland 04/08/2009 07:48:40
A bit of revamped storyline here.
"the truth is that landlords will never work with the tenant", the only thing that came out of ag holdings 2003 was heartbreak and loss.
The Scottish government could have made a difference to many tenants if they had, had the guts to amend the unworkable new act,
Ag holdings 2003 is ambigous to say the least and it is left to the lawyers to argue perceived points NOT always in LAW.
2

Wee Shooie,

04/08/2009 15:20:23
The landed gentry do not want any laws , rules or conditions laid out for them to abide to . They want total freedom of contract so that they call all the shots . They think in their mindset that MIGHT IS RIGHT . The Scottish Government will be hard pushed to change this upper class mentality .
3

Morry,

Scotland 04/08/2009 19:59:03
Shooie, if the Scottish Government want to remain just that, they would be wise to revisit ag holdings 2003, because if they do not, they just won't be here.

Richard Lochhead is a young and capable fellow, but he lacks knowledge and experience both of which can only come with age and as such he will lose votes right left and centre,
tenants these days need the wisdom and assurance of a minister with vision.
4

Wee Shooie,

05/08/2009 10:00:14
Re Morry3
The landlords got a fright during the 2003 Agric Holdings Act and had their feathers well and truly ruffled . They thought that they had lost their right to call the tune on tenancies after finally managing to circumvent 1948 Act . Against the spirit of the 2003 Act the landlords have dived down the route of contract farming or at best a very short tenancy .
By abusing the 2003 Act to their advantage , the landlords are now calling the tune again , much to the disadvantage of people who want to work on their rented family farm . These working people were not borne into a life of privelege ,unlike the landed gentry . Maybe the Scottish Goverment should look again at the 2003 Act and make it work the way that it should have worked in the first place . At the moment greed is the main driver .

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.