Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 16th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Debt fee 'excludes most needy'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 June 2008
NEW rules aimed at helping thousands of debt-ridden Scots by allowing them to declare bankruptcy will fail to help some who most need it, according to a report.
Citizens Advice Scotland says a £100 charge for individuals who want to make themselves bankrupt is preventing people on the lowest incomes from accessing the scheme and ridding themselves of crippling debts.

Since April, individuals have been all
owed to declare themselves bankrupt if they fall into a new "low income, low assets" (LILA) category.

Previously, people unable to pull themselves out of crippling debt could only become bankrupt if a creditor took them to court.

Citizens Advice Scotland says few creditors would go down this route, meaning debtors would face endless harassment from companies pursuing money from them.

As many as 5,000 people in Scotland are likely to become bankrupt through the new scheme this year.

A report by Susan McPhee, head of social policy and public affairs for Citizens Advice Scotland, says: "Anecdotal evidence from the bureau has suggested that the scheme is being accessed by some of our debt clients. However, it also suggests that there still remain certain groups of people who are being excluded from using the scheme due to the barrier presented by the requirement to raise the £100 application fee."

These include people on benefits, very low incomes and those suffering health problems.

A spokesman for the Scottish Government said the LILA rules are "a last resort out of the spiral of debt for those who can't afford it and simply have no option other than bankruptcy".

He added: "It is not our experience, so far, that the fee is proving to be an obstacle to the many debtors who have applied."



The full article contains 293 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 June 2008 9:49 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Consumer debt
 
1

SouthernSkye,

09/06/2008 07:41:55
Bankruptcy used to have a stigma attached. It used to be something to make one hang ones head in shame. now it is a simple "get out of debt free card". Someone has to pay for the debts that Bankrupts leave behind and, in the end, it boils down to those of us who have managed their finances and avoided the lure of cheap credit and H.P agreements and have not played the game of "keeping up with the Jonses"!
2

SouthernSkye,

09/06/2008 07:42:53
Aaargh..."Joneses"!
(Or however you spell it?)
3

,

09/06/2008 07:45:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/06/2008 10:14:20
Why go bankrupt? There is no need. All it takes is a bit of steel, knowledge of the rules and patience to sort out debt problems.

Southern Skye:

Who pays for the debts of bankrupts? Everybody else. Anyone who is in the business of lending money factors in a precentage of bad debt.

In the vast majority of cases, a debt will be sold on for a fraction of its value, to debt recovery firms. They will then use all their skills of intimidation and harassment in order to secure payment. If they can't get anywhere, they will eventually sell the debt on again, thereby repeating the process.

It is useful to bear in mind that once a debt has been passed on to recovery firms (rather than the original creditor), the recovery firm has probably paid 10% of the face value to buy the debt. Therefore there is plenty of scope for negotiation.
5

JayDeeTee,

09/06/2008 11:07:44
1. Worse than that....who pays for all the 'Limited Companies' who go bust one day then open up under a new name the following day? Local creditors and wee busineses lose millions when this happens and it is perfectly legal. Another example of two-tier Britain. Hound the poor b.astards who cannot live and meet their day to day debts but pat the backs of the rich b.astards who work the system.
6

SouthernSkye,

09/06/2008 13:20:05
5 JayDeeTee
".....Hound the poor b.astards who cannot live and meet their day to day debts ...."

But that is the problem isn't it? Society is so forgiving about having day to day debts.Where as it should be there are few day to day debts.It has been too easy for too long for too many weak-willed people to end up with enormous 'day to day' debts. Partly this is the fault of 'the system' and partly the fault of the weak-willed who need to keep up with their neighbours/family/friends etc.

There are genuine cases. Far too many. But there are far far too many who have carried on digging deeper holes for themselves.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.