Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SSE wants hydro-electric growth



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 March 2008
SCOTTISH & Southern Energy is considering building new hydro-electricity plants in Scotland to complement its growing wind-farm business.
The company, which is developing the 100Mw station at Glendoe near Loch Ness, yesterday confirmed it was "pursuing" two other, smaller hydro projects in Scotland.

Chief executive Ian Marchant said that hydro-electricity stations, complemented wind
farms because they provided a steady electricity supply and were "more valuable as an asset" than a few years ago".

The Glendoe project, which is ahead of schedule, has been widely viewed as the last major British hydro-electricity project.

Marchant said part of the reason the reason the group was examining new hydro capacity was the success of the project.

"It is because of a positive experience at Glendoe, but also the fact that renewable energy targets have been increased from three years ago, and so you would expect the boundary between what is acceptable and what is not has moved in favour of renewables."

Marchant said SSE was investigating whether planning restrictions may have softened for hydro as the Scottish Government encouraged renewable investment.

SSE would not reveal the location of the proposed new projects, other than to say they were "somewhere in the Highlands".

One of the projects would be the reconstruction of an existing station to improve efficiency, but another new project would create around 10Mw, Marchant said.

SSE has asked its projects team to investigate potential hydro projects in Ireland and Portugal.

Yesterday's announcement also outlined plans for the first investment outside Britain, with £500 million earmarked for renewable energy projects in continental Europe and China by 2013. This is on top of £2.5 billion the company will spend in the UK and Ireland during the same period.

In January SSE bought Dublin-based wind farm operator Airtricity. At the time the company said it aimed to have 3,500Mw of installed capacity from renewable sources, but yesterday the target was increased to 4,000Mw.

The hydro-electric plans were immediately criticised by environmental groups. Helen McDade, policy director at the John Muir Trust, said SSE was using climate change as an excuse to "undermine" the planning process. "Advocating the destruction of Scotland's natural heritage to 'save' the environment from climate change is a spurious argument put forward for the economic gain of private companies," McDade said.

Perth-based SSE also said trading for the year to 31 March was expected to be in line with analyst forecasts for pre-tax profits of around £1.22bn, a 13 per cent increase on last year.

scrutineer, page 40





The full article contains 433 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 March 2008 8:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Deighan,

27/03/2008 07:47:54
The success of Glendoe shows that hydro electricity can have a future but it also has a dark past and it has wrongs to right. The impacts of the earlier schemes in the upper Tay, the upper Great Glen and elsewhere on the runs of migratory fish is something that can not be allowed to continue because these schemes would never have been allowed had we known then what we know now. Far from being national assets many hydro stations actually have an ongoing enormous negative impact on the wealth of our country and the multiplier effects of sustainable tourism.
In fact Mr Marchant (and other interested watchers) a good and balanced judgement to adopt would be that if we would not allow a scheme to be built today then it should be scheduled as "to be removed" and we should revisit all current operations in this manner.
So SSE good luck with sustainable and sensitive development but please also urgently address the dismantling of the earlier mistakes. An easy starting point would be the controversial Perthshire Garry scheme.
2

WJohn,

Wonderland 27/03/2008 09:25:29
Wonder if the hydro schemes will be built large and run at much lower than possible output capacity in order to take full advantage of subsidies as is done at present?
Or will lots of little hydro plants be built in order to increase the number of subsidy earners?

www.swap.org.uk/subsidiesandsubterfuge.pdf
3

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 27/03/2008 10:00:05
Here we have it, Marchant admitting we need steady supplies like hydro to back up useless highly subsidised wind turbines.
How about he first brings back on line the over 50 MW of hydro generating capacity that was taken out of line in order to qualify for ROCS.
4

eyeswide,

yawning 27/03/2008 15:43:14


http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/614.htm
5

Ian12,

Scotland 27/03/2008 21:59:26
"Advocating the destruction of Scotland's natural heritage to 'save' the environment from climate change is a spurious argument put forward for the economic gain of private companies," says Helen McDade

Spoken like a true Marxist! What's wrong with economic gain anyway? I suppose you want the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange do you Helen? That idea went out in the 1970s.

So are we all supposed to turn the lights out so McDade and her dwindling band of Marxist-Leninist treehuggers can gaze at their 'pristine' scenery (which of course isn't pristine - Scotland used to be covered by the Great Caledonian Forest so our current barren landscape is entirely man-made)?

And there's a world of difference between a few wind turbines upsetting someone's view and the climate chaos that's coming our way if we don't sort out our emissions - which is exactly what renewable energy schemes and companies like SSE can help to do.

Wake up, love, and smell the climate change.
6

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 27/03/2008 23:01:58
#5 : You are talking utter twaddle.
We are talking about thousands of wind turbines and millions of tonnes of reinforced concrete and not a single tonne less coal will be burned at Longannet 7 Cockenzie.
Wind turbines are an expensive "as well as" and not "instead of"
Get a life and get some facts !

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.