Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

HBOS set to dampen fears on exposure



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 June 2008
HBOS is expected to have to address rising concerns about whether it is over-exposed to Britain's embattled housebuilding sector when it publishes its £4 billion rights issue prospectus later this week.

However, the Halifax/Bank of Scotland banking group received a boost yesterday when the UK Shareholders' Association said it did not expect the bank to publish any writedowns on individual property assets it holds.

UKSA said it realised this inf
ormation might be "commercially sensitive".

Roger Lawson, a director of UKSA, many of whose members are believed to be among HBOS's two million private investors, said: "I think the concern is people are asked to subscribe in new shares and there is a risk of further (housebuilding] liabilities being disclosed.

"Perhaps HBOS has not been as open with ordinary shareholders as they have been with the institutions and underwriters."

Lawson said that a general reassurance and comparison with UK peer banks would be reasonable and adequate.

He added: "I don't think HBOS should disclose commercially sensitive information, certainly not on individual loans."

The prospectus is set to come alongside a trading update in which HBOS's chief executive, Andy Hornby, is expected to deny the bank is excessively exposed to the housebuilding sector.

Housebuilders' shares have nosedived amid falling house prices and tougher conditions for gaining mortgages.

It is believed Hornby will say that, despite Halifax being Britain's biggest mortgage bank, HBOS does not consider its exposure to housebuilders – at about £3.3bn of loans – is proportionately greater than rivals.

Analysts believe loans to housebuilders comprise 3 per cent of HBOS's corporate loan book and 1 per cent of its total loan book – broadly in line with the UK average.

It is thought Hornby may also confirm that the bank has lent £40bn to construction and property companies – about 37 per cent of HBOS's loan book against a banking industry average of 38 per cent.

It remains unclear whether HBOS is prepared to give a figure for its potential losses on its property investments, or possible related writedowns.

HBOS declined to comment yesterday or to say on what day the prospectus and trading update will be published.

The bank's major housebuilder investments include a 50 per cent stake in Crest Nicholson and 20 per cent of McCarthy & Stone, both taken over the last two years.

The bank also took undisclosed stakes in Miller Group and Tulloch north of the Border in recent months.

McCarthy & Stone, a specialist retirement homes builder, recently drafted in investment bank NM Rothschild to look at the overall structure of its business, including revenue streams, products and costbase.

Apart from its equity stake in M&S, acquired when the bank teamed up with Scottish property entrepreneur Sir Tom Hunter to buy the company for £1bn two years ago, HBOS is also believed to be exposed to £80m of its £800m debt.

There has been some concern as to whether M&S can service its debt.





The full article contains 496 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 June 2008 1:09 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.