Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Government plans radical share bail-out for banks

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 October 2008
THE Government is drawing up radical plans to take shares in some of the UK's biggest high street banks.
Chancellor Alistair Darling is understood to be planning to invest billions of pounds in the banks in return for shares.

The emergency bail-out scheme would go ahead if the market worsens in a bid to secure the future of some of the biggest names in banking.

But the move, which follows the Government rescue of Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley, is likely to draw some criticism as it puts billions of pounds of taxpayers money at risk.

Mr Darling hinted at the plan after admitting that he is "looking at some pretty big steps which we would not take in ordinary times".

Conservative leader David Cameron said today he would support "drastic capital measures".

It comes as pressure grows on the Government to step up its action in the wake of the financial crisis.

The German government has announced that it is to follow Ireland's lead in offering 100 per cent guarantees on all deposits in its banks.

And it has also agreed a £38.7 billion rescue of Hypo Real Estate, one of its biggest banks.

Responding to questions about the Government's plans to take action to secure the financial sector, Mr Darling said: "Be in no doubt we will do whatever it takes to stabilise the banking system.

"We are looking at some pretty big steps which we would not take in ordinary times but we are ready to take them."

The Chancellor was set to today make a statement to the House of Commons updating MPs on actions taken to tackle the financial crisis.

The Government's banking reform legislation is expected to be announced tomorrow.

Mr Cameron said: "More drastic capital measures might be required. It is possible to imagine the circumstances in which government injections of capital, with proper safeguards and strict conditions, may be the best way to safeguard the long-term interests of the taxpayer."

In Italy, the country's second-largest bank, UniCredit, said it is to sell 973 million shares in a bid to raise £5.1bn of additional funds. The capital-raising announcement was accompanied by a profit warning, with it saying the past three weeks have been "extremely challenging".

In early trading today, the FTSE 100 Index tumbled more than 200 points after the weekend of financial turmoil in Europe.

Investors took scant comfort from Friday's backing of a US financial rescue to leave the FTSE 100 Index down almost five per cent or 240.5 points at 4739.

BOOST FOR SHAREHOLDERS

HBoS shareholders today benefited from extra shares as part of the capitalisation scheme announced in its right issue package.

For every 38 shares owned in the Edinburgh-based bank, one additional share is allocated to shareholders. It means the average HBoS shareholder received 401 shares. In total, 137 million new shares are to be issued.

The company agreed to issue the shares instead of paying a cash dividend to shareholders.

In early trading today, HBoS shares tumbled by seven per cent to 185.8p, reversing gains made at the end of last week.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 October 2008 11:05 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Halifax Bank of Scotland
 
1

gggrumpy,

06/10/2008 13:01:59
Brilliant, as a tax payer i am about to become a shareholder in these corrupt and greedy Banks.

Dont suppose it will be debated, probably not even bother voting on it.

Aahh well thats democracy for you.
2

NotaNumberYet,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 13:10:26
There's likely money to be made in these banks...in about 30 years time. Think of it as reverse PFI. If some future govt doesn't give the shares away cheaply we could all be loaded by 2040.
3

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 13:11:50
How much of our money is the government going to throw at reckless banks? How much do we stand to lose if they nevertheless go under as did Bradford and Bingley?

Why not use the normal bankruptcy procedure to distribute the assets of bad banks and let the actually solvent banks take over their business?
4

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 13:13:13
#2: If the chance of making money in dodgy banks was that good, we could all elect to buy their shares anyway. We don't need the government to force us to do this.
5

NotaNumberYet,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 13:20:08
#4 The trouble with people buying the shares is that, like the market, they tend towards very short sighted decision making. Govt 'should' be focussed on the long term and make decisions accordingly.

Doesn't your comment about bankruptcy procedures in #3 suggest that this is what will actually happen anyway? Think of the Govt (as funded by the people) as being 'actually solvent' - well, more so than any bank seems to be at the moment. We'll buy the business and make some money out of it before selling it on to a renewed market sometime in the middle of the century. Bankers become civil servants (which seems to be what the people are effectively demanding anyway) but otherwise things trundle on.
6

Victoria Ian,

06/10/2008 13:30:00
Amuses me how people talk about tax payers money being theirs. There is not enough space in this window to put enough zeros after the decimal point to express the percentage each individuals income tax money being used.
7

NotaNumberYet,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 13:34:04
#6 To be fair, it's surely a good thing to take some interest in democratic accountability. It may be an infinitesimally small percentage that the individual tax payer contributes towards hospitals, schools, nuclear weapons and (now) banks but contribute each and every one of us does and, collectively, we should take an interest in how it's spent.
8

Victoria Ian,

06/10/2008 14:01:42
#7 fair point. Just people really getting on their high-horses about it is a bit ridic imo.
9

NotaNumberYet,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 14:54:19
#8 We'd better watch out here - an 'outbreak of reasonableness' on these pages could see the whole lot shut down. ;-)
10

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

06/10/2008 18:32:11
#6: We have somewhere between 50 and 80 billion at risk over Northern Rock. We have 41 billion and counting at risk over Bradford and Bingley. We have somewhere between 100 billion and 140 billion and counting at risk on the Bank of England's cash for dodgy mortgages scheme.

So that's somewhere between 6300 and 8700 Pounds per taxpayer (say 30 million taxpayers) at risk already and this i just getting started.

I don't know about you, but six thousand quid is not a trivial percentage of the taxes I'm paying.

11

Scotish Exile,

06/10/2008 20:29:40
What were the auditors doing when they were supposed to be auditing the accounts of these institutions,were they turning a blind eye, or were they just incompetent??
12

Starburst,

Borders 07/10/2008 02:32:23
When my business was in "Trouble" I dont recall the Goverment being at all concerned and they certainly did not bail me out by buying shares
let the weak banks go to the wall , the fat cats hace milked their family silver, The strong banks will take up the slaack

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.