Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Beef supplies 'at risk' if retailers don't pay more



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 February 2008
ALISTAIR Darling and the Treasury may not like it, but the fact is that beef retail prices will have to rise substantially to ensure continuity of supply.
Farmers are currently receiving almost 15 per cent more for finished cattle than 12 months ago, with top-quality animals now making about 250p per kg on the hook, but this is still not enough to maintain the required level of production. Meanwhile, t
he processing sector is being squeezed hard by the large retailers, to the extent that there is very little profit in handling prime cattle.

The supermarkets have been repeatedly warned that they must pay more – and charge more at the checkouts – so that every link in the chain can make a decent margin.

Currently, the multiples are making virtually no profit from selling beef. The trade view is that competition is so fierce that the big four chains are terrified of losing market share. But some-one will have to blink first – and soon.

Kim Haywood, director of the National Beef Association, said yesterday: "The time has come for a complete rethink. Direct subsidies disappeared more than three years ago, world food supplies are getting shorter by the day, and both retailers and processors can no longer afford to risk future trade by consistently under-pricing their producers' cattle.

"The traditional response of abattoirs faced with an uncomfortable period of high prices has been to bear the loss stoically and be alert for the earliest possible opportunity to force down the market and recoup their margins, which usually means as soon as they get a sniff that more animals might be on offer."

That scenario is now highly unlikely, given the fact that the Meat and Livestock Commission reported that the kill of prime cattle during January was down by 6 per cent on a UK basis and 4 per cent lower in Scotland. A similar trend is evident in Ireland, traditionally the largest source of imported beef for the UK market.

With processors having to pay more to farmers just to keep their plants running, there are growing concerns that there could be a major casualty in this sector. Farmers are being quietly advised to check the terms of trade when they sell cattle.

Haywood added: "Processors must now change their tactics because it is they, not the feeder, who is going to be squeezed unless they react by making sure that retailers understand the necessity of paying more."

"It is up to (processors] to explain that they are faced with an irreversible shift in supply patterns and if trading terms do not allow them to pay the full price, then cattle will be directed towards the minority of companies that have a full appreciation of current conditions."

Farmers are certainly enjoying the higher prices, but the production chain is a long one, stretching for almost 30 months from the time a breeding cow is served by a bull to the progeny being fit for slaughter. Current values for store cattle – young animals bred in the hills and uplands for finishing on low ground farms – are at record levels. However, there is no sign of a halt in the steady reduction in the number of breeding cows. The overall economics of the beef sector still appear decidedly doubtful unless farmers are prepared to use the single farm payment to subsidise their enterprises. That may not continue for much longer.





The full article contains 579 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 February 2008 12:15 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

A Fairmer,

Aberdeenshire 26/02/2008 07:16:24
Only about 3% of beef breeding or feeding farm enterprises were making any money without single farm payment subsidy before costs of fertiliser, fuel etc. went rocketing up. Things are much worse now and, unlike other businesses, we can't squeeze our suppliers or pass extra costs onto our customers. That doesn't stop various unproductive regulators, inspectors and quangos from bleeding us dry at every opportunity. Its a lot of work and worry for no financial reward. Something's gotta give.....!
2

Organic peasant,

N E Scotland 26/02/2008 07:37:25
Fairmer is right the situation is unsustainable. The industry has been running on empty for years now, supplies are running out, prices must rise substantially. The London govt still dreams that the world is awash with food, that was last century. This is the new era of the rise of Asia, we need to change our thinking to secure our future.
3

Corstorphinery,

Edinburgh 26/02/2008 07:50:52
Don't forget that the supply of Brazilian beef has been cut off, meaning that the packers have less supply options than before. They are being squeezed hard by supermarkets at the moment and are scrabbling for stock. If a casualty is just around the corner as #1 implies, that will suit the supermarkets, who will merely ask their other suppliers to increase volumes, making plants more efficient and helping to keep retail values low! Oh the joys of supplying ASda...
4

George.,

26/02/2008 15:46:49
If there is a shortage of beef the other packers can't increase volumes to supermarkets unless they are willing to pay more for beef than either the export market or small butchers. The only way for prices is up. The supermarkets will try to keep the price they pay as low as possible for as long as possible but at some point farmers will stop producing beef as they will simply go bust. The same thing is happening with Pork and I bet Lamb and mutton are in the same boat. What is wrong is that the people have been used to cheap food for far to long. Why not use climate change to put massive tariffs on any imported food and use that money to boost agriculture in this country before the system collapses and people are fighting in the streets for food. Support in the past went straight to butchers and supermarkets as they used it as an excuse to cut the prices they paid to farmers.
5

Crofter Joe,

Highlands 26/02/2008 22:38:23
Prices are going up and not before time. But so are fuel, fertilizer, feed and just about anything else you need to live. and they say inflation is at 2.1%! Which planet are they living on?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.