Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

British Airways link-up with American Airlines set to get go-ahead

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 October 2009
BRITISH Airways is expected to get the regulatory green light from the US Department of Transportation this week on its proposed transatlantic tie-up with American Airlines, despite fierce opposition from one of its main rivals, Virgin Atlantic, and some political opposition.
It is believed that American regulators have accepted the two airlines' argument that they want a level playing field with the established Star Alliance collaboration between Lufthansa and United Airlines of the US, and the SkyTeam venture between Air France-KLM and American airline Delta.

However, critics of the BA/AA tie-up have described it as "anti-competitive". They say it is possible that the DoT will again insist on certain measures, including BA giving up hundreds of slots at Heathrow, and that could force the two airlines to walk away from the deal.

In 2001, the DoT agreed to a collaboration between the two airlines with the condition that BA agreed to give up 224 slots at Heathrow, where it currently has about a 40 per cent market share. BA was not prepared to do so and the deal collapsed.

Sources say it is still possible that the European Commission will unpick a new joint venture at a later stage. The agreement of both European and US regulators to BA/AA co-operation, mainly on lucrative transatlantic routes, is necessary. The EC has made public its concern that the deal may breach competition rules. Star Alliance and SkyTeam are also under EC investigation but have anti-trust immunity from US regulators.

Douglas McNeill, transport analyst at broker Astaire Securities, said: "I think it is odds-on that BA and AA will get the go-ahead. Although a couple of senators have written to the DoT querying the alliance, there has been no serious lobby against it."

BA has argued that it wants to compete fairly against Star Alliance and Sky Team, which collaborate across the Atlantic out of airports such as Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam and Zurich. "After all, the US has blessed those alliances.The level playing field argument is strong," one source said.

One of the biggest opponents of a BA/AA link-up – which would allow those airlines to collaborate in areas such as shared revenues, code-sharing and frequent-flyer offerings in a bitter downturn for the aviation industry – has been Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic.

A Virgin spokesman said ahead of this week's decision: "If the regulators allow BA and AA to merge they would be creating a monster monopoly which would harm consumers. The job of regulators is to protect travellers from higher prices and lack of choice, which would sadly happen if this merger was allowed."

Opponents have alleged that BA/AA is "not comparing apples with apples" in citing the Star Alliance and Sky Team partnerships. One source said: "BA is bigger transatlantically than both those rivals put together, and Heathrow has far fewer slots available to new rivals than the likes of Paris and Frankfurt, so there would be a far greater constraint on competition at the British hub."

It has been estimated that a BA/AA transatlantic joint venture would have 80 per cent of flights from the UK airport to Boston and 70 per cent to Miami.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 October 2009 1:53 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: British Airways
 
1

Alexander the Scot,

Michigan, U.S.A. 25/10/2009 03:24:50

I couldn't care less as to who links with who.
This is simply a test to find out if the wee sentry at the Scotsman is asleep at his post and find out if I can post ANYTHING.
It would appear that a great number who have shown leanings toward the Scottish National Party, have been denied submitting comments to these threads.
Never once have I used obscenity, yet I have found it impossible to express my opinion for over two years here.
I have tried to contact the Scotsman Editor asking to be contacted and given a reason why when I review my comment, everything seems to be in order, then when I try to post it, it simply vanishes. No answer, has been the loud reply.
Something is very wrong here. The "silent censorship" by the Scotsman started more than two years ago. I've noticed that I am not the only one whose comments have vanished...... The non Labourite-Unionists have seeminly been 'exiled', not only those overseas in Australia, Canada, and the United States, but in Scotland itself.
GOOD LUCK!
2

John M,

Melbourne, Australia 25/10/2009 08:07:23
Shoogles, what makes you think there is sufficient demand for direct Edinburgh-USA flights? If the route does not make commercial sense then why should any airline be forced to fly it?
3

eric,

lothian 25/10/2009 08:54:52
Like they already have from Glasgow.
4

AberdeenTom,

25/10/2009 09:51:19
#4 - Both BA and AA "tried" transatlantic from Glasgow and both got their hands burned. Neither is likely to return. Edinburgh already has a twice-daily service to the New York area (Continental Airlines) which has already established itself as Scotland's busiest and highest-yielding transatlantic service. Not bad, eh, and all from your local airport!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.