Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anger and frustration at Heathrow as Terminal 5 opening descends into chaos



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 March 2008
A DISASTROUS opening day for Heathrow's flagship £4.3 billion Terminal 5 ended with British Airways having to suspend all baggage check-in at the new facility.
A DISASTROUS opening day for Heathrow's flagship £4.3 billion Terminal 5 ended with British Airways having to suspend all baggage check-in at the new facility.

The decision, taken after a series of problems had wrecked what should have been a landmark day at the airport, meant travellers could only fly with carry-on hand luggage.

It completed what had been an utterly miserable few hours for many passengers, for BA and for airport operator BAA, with BA having to cancel 34 flights, including services to Glasgow and Aberdeen.

* Has your journey been disrupted by the chaos at Terminal 5? Click here to tell us your story *

After a good start to the day, with the first flight arriving eight minutes early and no luggage delays, problems accumulated.

First, staff had problems with the car park, then a computer problem led to some departing flights having to leave with no luggage aboard.

Downstairs in the giant building, passengers off the first Hong Kong flight all got their bags in quick time.

But soon it was clear there were major problems with baggage reclaim, with some passengers having to wait as long as two-and-a-half hours to collect their cases.

By lunch time the knock-on affect of all the problems led BA to cancel 20 flights – a figure which later increased to 34.

In early afternoon, a huge queue of more than 100 people wound back from the cancellation flights desk as people lined up to try to get away on other flights or get refunds.

To add to the difficulties the luggage belt in one part of the departure lounge failed and passengers were moved further down to a workable area.

Then at around 5pm, BA decided to suspend the checking in of all luggage going into the hold.

This left passengers already at the airport with the choice of either flying with just hand luggage, getting an alternative flight or getting their money back.

The Department for Transport said tonight: "We expect British Airways and BAA to work hard to resolve these issues and limit disruption to passengers."

BA said: "British Airways flights from Heathrow Terminal 5 will depart with hand baggage only with immediate effect due to problems associated with processing customers' baggage.

"BAA and British Airways are advising customers to check-in at Terminal 5 with hand baggage only if they wish to travel tonight or to telephone the airline for a refund or to rebook.

"Customers already at Terminal 5 who have not yet checked-in can travel with hand baggage only, rebook their travel plans or receive a refund.

"BA apologises to customers for the problems during Terminal 5's first day of operations following one of the most complex and largest airport moves in history.

"Customers can telephone 0800 727800 or check ba.com for the latest information. Customers departing from Heathrow Terminal 1 and Terminal 4 should check-in as normal."

The full article contains 530 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 March 2008 6:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British Airways
 
1

Upandunder,

27/03/2008 14:39:40
God only knows what the German passengers who got caught up in this fiasco made of it all.

I was among the first to use the brilliant and huge new Leipzig terminal, and yes, you've guessed it, everything went like clockwork.

Somebody should put a huge sign on the White Cliffs of Dover, "Out of Order".
2

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 27/03/2008 14:55:35
Ha ha ha ha how much did it cost to build? I presumed from the headline it was the expected 'flashmob' who had caused the chaos. No need when BAA can cork it up all by themselves.
3

Tris,

27/03/2008 15:14:05


Did they not do a dry run with the equipment last week...

They couldn't organise a..... well, they couldn't.

I wonder how they were going to manage the fingerprinting?

So how many of the senior management responsible for this world wide embarrassing fiasco will be signing on next week? Ah None you say.... sounds about right....

How's Sarko getting back to Paris?

4

Venachar,

27/03/2008 15:42:33
Its quicker by train under the channel!!
5

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 27/03/2008 15:59:48
Of course it was chaos! They forgot it was supposed to handle planes and passengers and luggage. It makes you feel proud to be British. We can make a dog's dinner of anything. What hope for the Olympic Games!
6

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA....captured from Mexico 1845 27/03/2008 16:01:35
Hey U Dudes here go again .

Attack Attack Attack. Do a single one of U SNP ranters, have a just one positive though towards anything the English do .

At least they built a world class terminal, for the world's businest international airport, Heathrow.

So the opening day did not go as planned . Once the glitches are worked out, this will be admired and enjoyed by all the millions of passengers who will use it.

Dudes, negativity begets negativity, and U dudes, if U are not careful, may get what U ask for.
Independence with a 3rd. world status.

Think positive and u will feel better all day long.

GC
7

Venachar,

27/03/2008 16:16:11
GalacticCannibal

Most people with sense try to avoid Thiefrow sorry Heathrow.
This enlightend area of the British Isles has direct daily flight to north america from our two major cities, I've used them on many occassions.

They have only taken over a decade to build the thing and have been doing dry runs for over a month. It is only a terminal. Hong Kong managed to open a brand new airport a few years ago without any problems.

At least we don't have fixed elections!
8

Gina Gibson,

Wales 27/03/2008 16:19:35
Hey, Galactic Doughball,
at least our pilots don't try to shoot each other on the plane!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7314668.stm

Your constitution says you guys have the right to bear arms but all you seem to do is arm bears!
9

Neil Waugh,

Old Strathcona 27/03/2008 16:25:57
Must have had some help from the eejits who run Pearson in Toronto. Makes you wonder how Hitler lost.
10

Tris,

27/03/2008 16:28:08
Galactic


It's hard to be positive when they keep on making such a mess of things.

It would however be easier to be sympathetic about it, if they weren't so full of how incredibly great they are and how incredibly hopeless everyone else is.

Before you go live, you make sure that things work... They obviously didn't.... result chaos.

Olympics . ha ha ha ... with Tessa Jowell and Lord Sir Seb in charge.... It is the 2014 Olympics isn't it?

11

Stefania Alvarez,

27/03/2008 16:39:14
Galactic is right ... every opportunity these bigots from the Braveheart fraternity get ... they pour out their anti-English pish.

Salmond does the same but he is marginally more clever at hiding his anti-English agenda.
12

Griffe,

27/03/2008 16:49:27
BAA should lose the right to run our airports. They are totally incompetent & make us a laughing [or crying] stock throughout the world.
13

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 27/03/2008 17:08:49
Anyone care to explain where the anti-English posts are above?
14

Gordieboy,

Musselburgh 27/03/2008 17:22:28
Damned if I can find anything anti-English in the posts above - GC, trust me, this is a pan-British problem and is NOT the exclusive reserve of the English. In Scotland we are just as capable of making a sorry mess of major infrastructure projects.

The comparisons with Germany are truly frightening. Look at the World Cup in 2006; Germany built 10 brand new, beautiful stadia on schedule and UNDER budget. The Wembley fiasco came in massively over budget and 3 years late and that was just one stadium. And let's not even start on the Scottish parliament.

Conclusion: move to Germany. Quite apart from less examples of staggering administrative incompetence, the beer and sausages are beyond compare.
15

Ken S.,

Reading 27/03/2008 17:29:05
#13 OscarMacApfel,
"Anyone care to explain where the anti-English posts are above?"

Can't discern any -- and I do miss them so ;-)

I'm with Gordieboy on this one; we Brits seem to have lost the art of project management. Some minor teething problems are inevitable on commissioning but this appears to have been a major systematic failure.
16

Mike Partick,

Glasgow 27/03/2008 17:46:27
Another article and no real mention of the T5 fingerprinting plans or their disruption. BAA intended to bring in fingerprinting of UK citizen's using T5 for domestic (i.e. internal to the UK) flights. Imagine...you are going about your own business lawfully within your home country and you are stopped and required to be photographed and fingerprinted before you can board your flight at T5 - is this what Gordon Brown means about "defending British values"?. There's been virtually no coverage of this in the UK media. Fortunately, England's Information Commissioner has put the fingerprinting on hold and asked BAA to justify this.
17

Duncan in Edinburgh,

27/03/2008 17:56:11
#14 Wembley may have come in over budget for the contractors, but the FA didn't pay a single penny more than was agreed, because they had the good sense to sign a fixed price contract where the risk was shouldered entirely by the contractor.

So, despite the delay in completion, the Wembley project should stand as a lesson for how to commission such things.
18

Calum Crubag,

27/03/2008 18:31:10
Oh dear... backward Britain! Independence? Of course it wouldn't work - well not for the English.
19

yockel,

27/03/2008 18:35:55
#14 Thats why BA continues not to care.
20

Stefania Alvarez,

27/03/2008 18:58:27
Anyone who is a regular on these forums will witness the rabid anti-English sentiments posted here ... it verges on pathalogical ...!!!

OscarMacApfel,Dumfries 27/03/2008 17:08:49
Like so many other SNP droids ... can't see past his own nose ... and has the attention span of a house-fly.

Shame
21

Jock H. the Republic of Scotland,

Arvada,Colorado,USA,,,,,,,, 27/03/2008 19:52:54
i see the UK whiners are in good form, even new cars need a break/in period, so come on folks lighten up, what would you do if you did,nt have a new terminal 5?
22

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 27/03/2008 20:32:59
#20 Dear Cuntybaws Alvarez show me one anti-English post above mine.
23

Neil Waugh,

Old Strathcona 27/03/2008 21:03:12
Any Englishman I've run into on this side of the pond has been a sack of hammers. They're just running true to form with the Heathrow balls up.
Anymore Scot-bashing and I'll have to go up to my room and paint my face blue.
24

,

27/03/2008 21:17:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

27/03/2008 21:18:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Stewarty,

27/03/2008 21:25:59
To those who argue that today's events are only teething troubles and to be expected, I suggest that they should bear in mind that they have had field tests at T5 for weeks involving hundreds of volunteers.

British Airports Authority has long been recognised as one of the most incompetent organisations ever to "grace" the UK, and things have gone from bad to worse since the Spanish took over ownership. The best thing would be for the UK Government to strip the company from its existing Spanish owners (no compensation, of course), temporarily nationalise it, before auctioning it to the highest competent bidder. The money thus accrued could be well spent on things which matter to the taxpayers, like education and the national health service etc.
27

Sarah McD,

Dundee 27/03/2008 22:19:41
Galactic Cannonball,

There was no mention of the SNP or the English until you brought it up.

You are nothing but a sad little troll, looking to stir trouble where there is none.

Having spent a fair amount of time in L.A. I have never heard anyone speak so much sh*te and use the term "dude" so much. You are overdoing it, dude, in your sad but unconvincing attempt to appear to be a like some sort of cool skater dude.

You are just as likely to be from, oh, I dont know, Luton or Cumernauld.

And on the off chance that you are actualy American, please try to sort out your own troubles, like your pilots trying to shoot each other (jesus, these are the educated ones) or Texans microwaving babies (really!!!) before pointing out ours.

But we all know you're not American. No Yank would ever be so anti SNP. They wouldn't even care. You diss them every single post you make.

You are a spotty faced little unionist troll.

Why dont you show some guts, admit it, and argue your case more honestly.

Tw*t

28

Gina Gibson,

Wales 27/03/2008 22:29:29
Very well said Sarah McD!
29

Sarah McD,

27/03/2008 22:47:36
Thank you, Gina.

The little tw*t had it coming.
30

Venachar,

27/03/2008 22:53:00
Before I retire for the evening, well said for everyone on Galactic plonker.

The English Broadcasting Corporation are just as scathing as anyone so where GalacticCannibal thinks it is an SNP thing is just mind blowing.

BTW perhaps Cannibal should reflect on the latest polls where the SNP are trouncing Labour and the rest.
If there was a vote right now Labour and the other parties would be kicked into touch because the SNP are fullfilling their manifesto.

Hasta la vista baby!
31

,

27/03/2008 23:52:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

snoozyowl,

Wales 27/03/2008 23:59:35
All very sad. Why on earth did we sell BAA to the Spanish? Did no one in England want it? (Presumably not). And why is BA allowed to mismanage baggage handling in BAA's terminals? What a shower. We can do things well in England but so often we seem to get it wrong.
33

Another King of Spain,

28/03/2008 00:23:42
www.excess-baggage.com are always there to pick up the pieces. They did an excellent job for hundreds of T5 passengers tonight.

Hats off to their crew.
34

Flatcap,

Sunny Orkney 30/03/2008 17:44:09
As a reasonably regular traveler to mainland Europe, I always try to avoid Heathrow because of its terrible history of delays and missed connections.
If there are any problems, the first flights BA (or as we should really call them Heathrow world wide airways - as they have real no interest in short haul flights) cancel are to Scotland. This has happened to me on several occasions in the past.
As a result and when it’s appropriate, I travel out of Aberdeen using KLM and transfer in Amsterdam to my onward destination. The cost is comparable if not cheaper (providing the £ regains its stronger position against the €).

As we have a nationalist government wishing to make stronger ties with mainland Europe, maybe they should invest in a small fleet of ‘Scottish Airways’ aircraft. Regular links to Amsterdam and Frankfurt out of Scottish airports would allow businessmen and holiday makers to catch connections to every country across the world without the worry of delays and lost baggage and more importantly dealing with pompous BA staff.

Cheers fellow Europeans.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.