Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hester in line for multi-million pound pay day if RBS turnaround is completed

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 June 2009
Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester is in line for a £9.6 million pay package if he leads a turnaround of the ailing lender, it emerged today.
RBS won support from UK Financial Investments (UKFI), which controls the Government's more than 70% stake, for Mr Hester's salary and long-term bonus arrangements at a meeting last week.

UKFI is thought to have backed the move because of links to the bank's share price. This would have to pass a 70p threshold for the long-term bonus to be paid in full, by which point the taxpayer would have made millions in profits.

The stock is currently trading at around 37p after hefty share falls earlier this year in the wake of the Government bailout.

Mr Hester is in line for £1.2 million in salary, around £2 million in annual non-cash bonus payments and around £6.4 million of long-term share and stock option awards.

Long-term incentives would be based on a mix of targets and the RBS chief's options would be paid for 2009 but would only be able to be redeemed after three years.

But critics said the decision to tie the bonus mainly to the performance of the bank's shares could encourage risk.

Roger Lawson, of the RBS Shareholders Action Group, said: "It is absolutely outrageous that the Government does not use its power to bring the remuneration of bankers in these companies down to a reasonable level.

"Do they need to pay him this much to make him work harder?"

He said basing a bonus on share price could mean the focus would be put solely on this one measure at the cost of other strategies.

"This just encourages risky behaviour," he said.

"It is based on getting the share price up and that will depend on many factors other than the performance of the company itself."

An RBS spokeswoman confirmed the deal had been agreed but was in the process of being finalised by the firm's board.

"We have said consistently it is all linked to performance and will only be paid out if targets are met," she added.

A statement from UKFI said: "UKFI expects all awards to be based on long-term sustainable performance which would rebuild the business of the banks."

Mr Hester's pay package was agreed in the same week that his predecessor agreed to a voluntary cut to his controversial pension payments.

Sir Fred Goodwin, vilified as being the man at the helm of RBS when it crashed into public ownership last year, was the centre of public outrage over the size of his retirement fund.

Last week the ex-chief executive offered to hand back more than £210,000 a year of his pension payout, reducing his payout from £555,000 to £342,500 a year.

Public fury was fanned earlier this year when it was revealed his agreement to step down from the bank as the state came to its rescue effectively doubled his pension pot, leaving him with a £703,000-a-year package – including a £2.7 million lump sum.

Under his leadership RBS was heavily exposed to toxic assets and bad debts, and disastrously bought Dutch bank ABN Amro at the top of the market in 2007 before the credit crunch struck.

The new chief executive pay deal comes as reports revealed the RBS corporate hospitality package for Wimbledon is costing up to £300,000.
An email leaked to the Mail on Sunday describes the bank's booking of an "entertainment suite" for more than 42 guests for each of the tournament's 13 days, at a cost of at least £19,500 a day.

The bank will also pay up to £100 for each Centre Court seat and £75 a head for lunch, according to the paper.

RBS said it was tied into the Wimbledon contract but stressed it had slashed corporate spending by 90%.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 June 2009 10:21 AM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Zippy,

Sydney 22/06/2009 11:57:09
So what if RBS are spending on corporate hospitality at Wimbledon. If it gets them business then good luck to them! The issue is tabloid nonsense.

Likewise if you want to have good people leading a company, you have to pay the going rate and a performance related incentive seems just right to me.
2

Jonboy,

22/06/2009 14:28:25
Thanks Stephen!
3

JayJay,

Right here 22/06/2009 15:51:20
This is comedy gold. Lessons have been learned eh?

Lest we forget, this bank has dumped a few hundred billion in dodgy loans on to the taxpayer. It receives further state support by way of Treasury guarantees. It will soon enough lob several thousand staff on to the state payroll when the near inevitable "rationalisations" take place. Ordinary businesses are feeling the brunt of massive hikes in interest margins if they are lucky, and removal of facilities if they are not quite so fortunate. And slabs of the global empire are being sold off.

So when #1 above talks about "rate for the job" he must surely be either Mr Hester, Mr Darling, or some other city bozo who has forgotten what happened to the last guy who ran RBS who was, apparantly, so brilliant he had to be paid an absurd salary to be motivated.

This sort of incentive package for an organisation propped up by the taxpayer is ludicrous. How can Hester fail to raise the share price when all he has to do is jettison all the questionable loans, lose tens of thousands of staff, severely curtail business lending whilst hiking margins and selling off great chunks of the business. Would it not have been better to incentivise him on recoveries of dodgy loans - or is that too much like hard work?

You have to admire the sheer brass neck of the corporate elite, especially in financial services. With 7 figure salaries guaranteed, they now know for sure that, no matter what they do, government will be there to bail them out. How does that encourage a return to sensible lending practices?
4

barrow5,

glasgow 22/07/2009 21:24:01
I disagree with Zippy Why does RBS need hesre at all.
Allwe are getting from him is the same old tiresome strategy of making thousands of little people redundant,
any clown can come up with that.If he were to bring the bank back to profitability without one single job being lost then I would say give him the millions.
These people are not going to get other jobs the country will lose their tax & nationa insurance payments.Other workers will have to pay their dole money. Th despondency in our local branch is now very noticable,once cheery pleasant & helpful people are now obviously depressed &minds not on their work, & I don't blame them.
What does someone,made a bank boss with an already absurd salary need with an incentive,the inference being that he will otherwise sit with his feet up on the desk.
The only incentive I ever got from any firm Iworked for was keeping my job.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.