Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


With 20% pay rises a thing of the past Scottish Enterprise stays in the black

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 August 2008
NEWLY slimmed-down economic development agency Scottish Enterprise has posted a £2.5 million surplus on its £535m budget in 2007.
It is the last year the under-pressure quango reports results under its old structure, comprising training and local enterprise support as well as its now core focus of economic development.

Since the SNP administration ordered its "decluttering"
programme last September, the agency has transferred more than 1,000 jobs to other bodies, and next year has to make do with a budget of £327m.

Two years ago, SE bosses won a big round of inflation-busting pay rises, with packages rising as much as 21 per cent. According to this year's report, published yesterday, pay rises for the latest full year were more modest.

Chief financial officer Hugh Hall said: "All our executive board members got the basic pay increase of 2.5 per cent across the board. That is what we all received."

Chief executive Jack Perry received a total payout of £225,000, up from £219,000 the previous year. This included a £24,000 performance bonus.

Chief operating officer Lena Wilson, who between autumn 2007 and May this year was also interim head of Scottish Enterprise's international arm, Scottish Development International, took home £193,000, including a £17,000 performance bonus and £9,000 car allowance. This was up 7.8 per cent on the previous year, but SE said this reflected her dual roles. Hall made £159,000, including a £14,000 bonus and £4,000 car allowance.

A budget underspend is far preferable to a budget overspend. Two years ago, SE was embroiled in a massive row over a £33m black hole, requiring a bailout from the then Scottish Executive to the tune of £45m. The following year it made a surplus – an underspend – of just under £1m.

Hall, who was brought in to sort out the organisation's finances, said he had "steadied the ship". Job cuts of about 260 have saved the group about £10m.

Hall said: "For me the big issue going forward is how we can actually build up the resources we have got available, particularly in the investment side and the extent we can develop our sources of finance.

"Having steadied the ship it is a case of let's see what we can achieve in terms of additional resources."

Last year, SE put £40m into the Scottish Co-investment Fund, which invests in companies alongside private equity investors. The fund also attracted £32m funding from the European Union.

"We will use that over the course of the next seven or eight years to invest in growing companies," Hall said.

"With an economic downturn already kicking in, one of the areas that may well need our support is equity finance. Even in quarter one this year we are seeing increased demand for our investment fund. Tucking that money away means we are able to meet that demand."

A Scottish Government spokesman welcomed the report, saying: "It is very pleasing to see that Scottish Enterprise is operating effectively and within budget."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 August 2008 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish Enterprise
 
1

,

15/08/2008 03:39:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

observer9,

Glasgow 15/08/2008 08:11:10
It was announced today that the two top bosses at SE, Jack Perry and Lena Wilson saw the accumulated total value of their pensions surge £400,000 to almost £1.5m, with only £21,000 of the increase coming from their own contributions.
Is that because they made a shaving saving off their budget. Whoop de do.
Did they take a cut when they overspent by £30+ million?
Do I know what rhetorical is?
Can anyone please tell me why they are 1: Paid so much. 2: What innovative, entrepreneurship skills do they have. 3: How much personal risk in starting and running a commercial business have they taken.
SE managed to whizz £750,000 per job on a medical innovation company and has the company Cyclacel paid back the £ 5 million pounds they received in funding back to the Scottish Taxpayer as they promised as a result of them relocating to the U.S.?
http://tinyurl.com/68yke5
info on todays pension figures for Jack & Lena
3

Stirling Sentinel,

Stirling 15/08/2008 11:17:14
Well done SNP ! You have shot a few fat cats in the backside. Excellent savings too. Keep it up.
4

Brad,

Glasgow 18/08/2008 13:12:20
#3, which fat cats?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.