Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


I'm quitting £200k-a-year hotseat, says Mr Enterprise

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 May 2009
JACK Perry, the £200,000-a-year chief executive of Scottish Enterprise (SE), is quitting the agency. His unexpected resignation, effective once a successor has been found, is set to spark an upheaval in and around the boardroom.
The agency's board, led by chairman Crawford Gillies, could take six months to find a successor, though it will want to move as quickly as possible.

The announcement came barely a day after electronics giant Hewlett-Packard announced it was ending manufacturing in Renfrewshire with the loss of up to 850 posts. Production is being shifted to the Czech Republic.

The plant, opened in 1987, was one of Scotland's biggest inward investment successes.

Mr Perry denied yesterday there was any connection between this and his resignation.

Sources close to the agency say there was little left for Mr Perry to do after the latest organisational reshuffle and that there was some frustration at the coolness of relations with the SNP administration.

Another said he was quietly pleased to be getting out without a crisis, scandal, internal civil war or budget battle.

Possible contenders for the post include Lena Wilson, chief operating officer of SE, and Frank Blinn, a senior figure in the accountancy giant PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).

One area where change is most likely to be felt is in the agency's relationship to the SNP administration. SE was not given a major role in combating the recession, even though it is the country's premier public-funded agency specifically set to promote enterprise.

A more activist role is likely to emerge, with activities in the hi-tech business start-up area sharpened and expanded.

Mr Perry said yesterday:

"I always felt that between four and six years was about the right length of time to occupy this particular hot seat and now having been in post for five and a half years, I feel the time is right to move to the next stage of my career."

Mr Perry, formerly a partner in PwC, was appointed under the previous Labour-Lib Dem coalition. He helped stabilise the agency after a series of reorganisations and reforms – only to end up leading a convulsive reorganisation of his own soon after the SNP took over at Holyrood. He leaves behind an agency with a slimmed-down workforce, budget and operational role.

The Local Enterprise Companies (LECs) were shorn off to local authorities, the skills function was hived off into a separate organisation and other slimdowns and economies were pushed through.

The suspicion was that the SNP administration always regarded the agency as a tool of west of Scotland Labour, with many Labour "lifers" in middle and senior positions.

Relations, while polite, were cool and its work and activities brought under the remit of finance minister John Swinney.

"In the past few years, we have done much to transform SE," said Mr Perry yesterday. "We are now absolutely focused on supporting our business customers with projects and programmes driven by the needs of Scotland's key industries.

"We are one single, cohesive, national organisation operating without narrow geographic boundaries. We are much slimmer and more cost-effective, too."

The agency never formed part of the First Minister's Council of Economic Advisers and seemed to be kept well away from the government's broader economic agenda.

This situation grew increasingly anomalous as the recession deepened and with it calls for the administration to be more pro-active and to use all the tools available to it.

But by the time the full blast of recession struck, the agency had lost much of its former power and prestige, its staff had been slimmed down and its budget was also strictly limited.

SE's diminished status also reflected changes across the economy. Scotland's economic performance came to rest increasingly with major international companies, business service operations and, until recently, the financial services sector. By 2007 the days when the manufacturing sector ruled the policy roost were long gone, and with it the "big hitter" role of a government agency.

Mr Perry says he has no plans for life beyond SE. He is known to hanker after a "portfolio" career, working with a number of companies.

Critics of Mr Perry's tenure say the organisation drifted into inconsequence after the last reorganisation 18 months ago.

"There was no spark. It seemed comatose," said one "The agency needs new leadership and new ideas and a complete break with the past."

But a former SE colleague, Lorna Jack, said: "I think he did a terrific job. He was the right person at the right time for Scottish Enterprise – very calm, very professional.

"He was just a no-ego chief executive that put the organisation first and took the flak that comes with the role in a non-egotistical way."

Ups and downs of his controversial five-year tenure

December 2003: Jack Perry is appointed chief executive of Scottish Enterprise (SE).

April 2005: SE under fire for investing £25 million in a healthcare company, Stirling Medical Innovations, after criticism that it represented too big a commitment of taxpayers' money into a single project. Mr Perry is forced to admit that SE's programmes have had little impact on improving Scotland's poor productivity levels.

November 2005: Board members of SE's local enterprise companies, along with the country's small businesses, express outrage over the agency's plans to restructure the network.

December 2005: Mr Perry comes under pressure from MSPs concerned that his radical overhaul of the agency could backfire.

January 2006: Officials across the SE network are told to slash spending plans after finance directors discover it was on course for a £100m overspend. MSPs tell SE to "fundamentally rethink" its proposed structural overhaul.

March 2006: Audit Scotland tells SE to improve its self-evaluation methods and provide a clearer assessment of its contribution to expanding Scotland's economy. SE hits back at "saboteurs" who have leaked internal documents alleging a projected £40m budget overspend "crisis" in 2006-7. Ministers order accountants to study the books at SE after the business development quango overspends by £30 million.

April 2006: Tomorrow's Leaders International (TLI), a government scheme to help turn bright young Scots into the entrepreneurs of tomorrow, is scrapped as a result of the cash crisis at SE. First minister Jack McConnell gives his personal backing to beleaguered SE chiefs. MSPs threaten legal measures against SE if it fails to appear to present its restructuring plans and answer questions about its £30m 2005-6 budget overspend. Former Scottish industry minister Brian Wilson calls for scrapping of SE.

May 2006: SE under fire for shelling out at least £30,000 a year on chauffeur-driven limousines. Enterprise minister Nicol Stephen gives SE £50m of extra funding.

June 2006: SE removes a senior executive who oversaw a £60 million "black hole" in the budget only to give him a new role with the same six-figure salary. MSPs condemn Mr Perry's response to the SE financial crisis as "wholly dissatisfactory". SE announces up to 100 job losses.

August 2006: Mr Perry forfeits annual bonus. SE stripped of its entire training, skills and education functions so it can focus solely on growing and creating private-sector firms.

September 2007: Salaries and bonuses for top bosses at SE increase by more than a fifth. Two senior SE executives are accused of favouritism in awarding contracts several months before the economic development body suspended them.

December 2007: SE to give its 2,600 staff private medical cover at a cost of £500,000 under a five-year deal.

June 2008: Jack Perry admits that £35m of taxpayers' money used on the Stirling Medical Innovations project will not achieve expectations.

August 2008: SE posts surplus of £2.5m on its 2007 budget. It emerges that staff ran up more than 17,000 sick days in a year.

January 2009: SE takes charge of ITI (Intermediate Technology Institutes) Scotland.

April 2009: Mr Perry accompanies Alex Salmond to Beijing on visit to meet senior figures in Chinese commerce.

Bill Jamieson: 1970s throwback whose time has gone – we just don't need it any more

NOW that Scottish Enterprise has been buttoned up, clipped, shorn, shaken and slimmed down, quite what is the point of keeping it at all?

The tenure of Jack Perry saw many of the flailing legs of this 1970s industrial octopus chopped off. Gone now is the sense of a mighty mover and shaker, the agency that moved mountains – or moved a lot of earth in landscaping projects and advance factories.

And long gone is the reverberating tread of its former leaders: heavyweights such as Lewis Robertson, who had a contacts book that opened up like a giant accordion, swallowing up most of his desk.

Whose telephone numbers were not on those intensely documented pages – the secretary-general of the United Nations? The head of the World Bank?

Scottish Enterprise, aka the Scottish Development Agency, is a shadow of its former self and not even the administration at Holyrood seems to have much time for it.

It has been reduced to a specialist venture capital investment trust and business advisory arm, with heavy concentration in esoteric sectors such as biomedical research and life sciences.

A logical progression would be a steady transition of its fund management business into the private sector. If the aim is to provide start-up capital to new high value-added businesses on commercial judgment and criteria, as opposed to job preservation, SE is as good as in the private sector already – although full conversion could see a further 25 per cent shaved from its budget.

Its strategic role also looks over. The agency never formed part of the First Minister's Council of Economic Advisers and seemed to be kept well away from the government's broader economic agenda. This situation grew increasingly anomalous as the recession deepened and with it calls for the administration to be more pro-active and to use all the tools available to it.

But by the time the full blast of recession struck, the agency had lost much of its former power and prestige, its staff had been slimmed down and its budget was also strictly limited.

Its diminished status also reflected changes across the economy. Scotland's economic performance came to rest increasingly with major international companies, business service operations and, until recently, the financial services sector.

By 2007, the days when the manufacturing sector ruled the policy roost were long gone, and with them the "big hitter" role of a government agency.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 May 2009 11:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish Enterprise
 
1

Colin B,

Bearsden 30/05/2009 00:59:47
Not very effective, went native/soft on staff even after complaints to auditors, policy re Gateway and RSA had to be dictated to him.
Lena Wilson will be worse- a glorified adminstrator and token woman
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 30/05/2009 01:03:08

At £200k per Annam, JACK Perry can afford to Quit,,,,,
,,,,'Thankyou-Very-Much'!!!

£200k,
It equates to 16.666years wages for some! (re:, £12k PA)
Far too many '6'es, 3 for the devil, as it were!




3

Colin B,

Bearsden 30/05/2009 01:23:51
Jack's salary a pittance of a cost compared to absenteeism.

There was a huge Labour infiltration of SE eg Ron Culley
4

W Smith,

Middle East 30/05/2009 03:33:38
So it was thanks to the Tories that Scotland became silicon glen then, eh?

That doesn't tally with the Scots who wander about like orphans looking for a mum and who always accused Maggie Thatcher of 'not caring' for Scotland.

The truth is she didn't care for dead industries walking that were run by work shy Trade Union militants.

The coal mining industry was on life support and she pulled the plug.

GET OVER IT.

As for new technologies replacing the old ones Mr Salmond stood back and watched a Malaysian business man give 6 million quid to his old univerity (St Andrews) and Salmond followed up by giving around 6 million quid to gay rights group.

He just doesn't get it.

The SNP weren't bothered about Sir David Lane leaving either - the good news is we've got James McLintock back.

Thats handy.
5

donald,

glasgow 30/05/2009 07:10:26
That post was like many another - a lottery win for some Labourite. There are no politics in the careerist GB Labour Party any more, just a pools win in a system of patronage from Local Government posts; Community posts, Quangoes and Tame Union posts on the gravy train to London and Brussels.
6

donald,

glasgow 30/05/2009 07:13:29
Winners of such posts stick out like a Commons Speaker in tights and goonie in the dilapidated, bent, Springburn Road.
7

cabrach loon,

inverness 30/05/2009 07:19:37
great benefits from bringing poor eastern europe into the EU, they export crooks anbd crims and import industries from the richer nations because their wages are lower.

Where is the benefit to Europe and is this what the UK gets from paying the EU 40 million pounds per day? Well done Westminster!
8

Eustace,

/ 30/05/2009 07:57:20



Part of the Bullying Network.
9

The Strategist,

30/05/2009 09:00:24
I'm delighted he's going. With a non industrial background he was much more interested in process than progress.
10

Are we there yet?,

30/05/2009 09:04:20
This would be Mr Markets-Don't-Fail?
Oddly, no comment on that since the demise of Scotland's banks, then Dunfermline Building Society.
What exactly has Mr Markets-Don't-Fail achieved?
Neutered by the bullies in charge, the 'organisation' is run by people whose first interest is themselves - big salaries, big pensions, the odd MBE - and continues to waste our money delivering programmes in competition with private sector providers.
The test? How many of them would you hire?
11

JayJay,

Right here 30/05/2009 09:06:25
Faced with a total banking meltdown, it is not too hard to see why Mr Perry might feel that he is armed with a pea-shooter in a fight against heavy artillery. And I do believe he took a jump because he realises full well that the current financial crisis simply exposes SE for the powerless, ineffective waste of money it has always been - only magnified a hundred fold.
What is the point in seeking to stimulate start ups, or encourage the growth in SMEs when the banks are refusing to lend a penny, even to sectors deemed "key" by SE? What products does the organisation have at its disposal to deal with a collapse in lending, corporate failure, a bust construction sector, bankrupt property market etc etc?
Swinney and the quangocrats really need to sit down in a darkened room and figure out how they are going to stimulate an economy where credit is tight and in some cases absent. They need to figure out how they can sufficiently de-risk bank lending. Of course, such matters require new thinking and there is precious little of that - beyond lets appoint a consultant - in the SE network.
12

Barontorc,

East of Java 30/05/2009 09:26:06
Once again a cronyism club is open to public opinion and the real questions are never asked by the "establishment" media - like what is it all about - the country has been going down the swannee for years - and what was SE / SDA / placebo-land / doing about it? Go ahead and list what it has achieved - and at what cost - but don't let it spoil your day

One thing's for sure, it shows the judgement of the current SNP government to be spot-on by showing it up for what it is - an expensive job-club sinecure "for the boys", skimmers all with no substance.
13

Martyk,

30/05/2009 09:28:10
Hmmm. Hard to actually see what SE is actually for these days. If a small company has a good business plan and so on then private venture capital will invest in it. If it hasnt then they wont. But the taxpayer will via SE? Scrap it and forget the silly infighting and squabbling this whole topic seems to revolve around.
14

A Crofter,

Western Isles 30/05/2009 09:57:35
The enterprise companies subvert our democracy. They gang up with lickspittle councillors to exclusively populate various committees, ignoring any input from the general public.

FatMan - like his predecessors - promised us a bonfire of these useless, arrogant quangos. I see no smoke.

15

WanderingPict,

Washington DC 30/05/2009 11:04:44
At last! Private sector expats breathe a huge sigh of relief. Please no civil service or an SE labour hack replacement, but a high profile successful entrepreneur. Someone who does business and not meetings. More like Crawford Beverage than Lena Wilson.
16

roadstohell,

30/05/2009 12:28:54
I would like to know exactly what,apart from tons of paper & spin, SE has actually acheived ????????

As an orginisation, it has been known for years & years as a refuge for "cannae hack it" losers, cant hack it in business or private sector > OK chat to your buddies in SE and bingo a cushy number with an enormous budget, that nobody seems capable of auditing properly, you MAY even have to turn up at work now & again, but I believe that thsi was only an option, and then just to make sure none of your "buddies" were knifing you in the back !!!!!!!!!

MHhhh all that money, and exactly what has ever been acheived ?????

Another bastion of croneyism and gravy trainism, maybe he knows that something is about to change, and is leaving the sinking ship..............

Bankers, Politicians, local councillors, Quangos, all had their snouts in the trough for far too long, and it is the mugs , the "ordinairy" people that have been paying for it.

SE, mmhh big fat salaries, for big fat lazy cats, that just spin & spin & spin, and don't even think about looking into their "expenses" accounts !!!!!!!

wooooohooooooo !!!!!!!!!!

"get you money for nothing, your kicks for free"
17

Phil o Brian,

30/05/2009 13:10:28
I have worked with Jack Perry in the past. He gave up a very high profile job to go and do his public service ie to try and help Scotland to progress.
I have watched his time at SE and it has been a period of continual complaining about him and SE.
Why would anybody with his experience and background give up their job to take up a position like this, when he has to deal with incompetant politicians and newspapers who think cheap headlines will bring back the readers.
18

The Strategist,

30/05/2009 14:30:20
#19

Perry came from an accounting/auditing type background and has demonstrated time and time again that he simply does not have the industrial vision or experience needed to grow a broad based Scottish economy.

However, I would concede that it not neccessarily his fault. The blame lies really with those that appointed him.

I hope that his replacement will be a little more outspoken, less sycophantic and hasn't got an MBA!
19

Owl in Training,

Glasgow 30/05/2009 15:06:02
once again 10/10 for shoddy journalism, littered with inaccuracies. You must be so proud.

Jack Perry will be a sore loss to Scottish Enterprise. He has led the organisation wisely, made no decision flippantly, at all times kept his demeanor cool, calm and collected.

99% of the comments here are made by people with no knowledge of the man himself or indeed the workings of SE.

If Jack Perry had £1 for every ex-employee who had fleeced their salary each year they were there for doing sod all, took their healthy redundancy packages, then proceeded to slag off the organisation simply because it did still run (and more effectively) without them - he could retire now!

The SNP administration have given him a hard time - why? Because he has more knowledge and business acumen in his head than they do collectively. He could have been a massive resource to Holyrood if Salmond had ever managed to get over the envy he felt.

Working for Jack Perry has been a pleasure. He is a good, decent, hard working man. A difficult act to follow and will be missed by many within the organisation.

Oh and those trying to lump someone with a £200k salary in with the bankers fiasco, clean your eyes out, they are not even in the same ballpark. Comparing him to the corrupt politicians fleecing their expenses is also not even te same argument. But I get it, you are just angry at everyone.
20

Ewan Randall,

30/05/2009 16:42:39
(#4) – (W Smith) – Didn’t the Tories win the general election in 1951?

Isn’t it true that the Tories weren’t in power after the second world war until the early fifties?

Is there not evidence that the origins of silicon glen comes in the 1940s?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Glen
21

Geomac 1,

Scotland 30/05/2009 17:28:26
Yet another own goal for the SNP administration. the way they are managing the economy all that will soon be left is assembling windmills whose components are manufatured elsewhere!!
The ITIs obviously didn't suit the SNP and now Jack's face doesn't fit. Could this be an opening for that well known entrepeneur Kenny MacAskill?
22

Geomac 1,

Scotland 30/05/2009 17:40:01
For some reason we're not being allowed to comment on the carbon capture prototype at Longannet so I'll do so here since it fits with the SNPs smoke and mirrors and hype.
last week we had Salmond and Mather singing proudly about "Scottish renewable technology leading the world" Now we learn that the CC technology being used at Longannet is Norwegian. Come on SNP, stop taking us all for fools. Please tell me of ONE technology in which we are "leading the world"? Wind - no! We assemble the technology of others. Wave - no. Our prototypes have failed. Tidal - no! We're talking about using technology from elsewhere. Combined heat and power - no way. We're way behind the curve.
Now we learn that CCS is MAYBE ready for use by 2014??? How do the SNP intend to keep our lights on - we deserve to know!! And no more hype and wishful thinking!!
23

ZipptJeffrey,

Castle 30/05/2009 19:06:38
The question is who would be daft enough to employ Jack Perry once he is booted out of Scottish Enterprise. Essentially Perry has done absolutely nothing to help the scottish economy and has hidden behind daft managemtn speak statements that are baffling. Perry is senile.

with regard to Scottish Enterprise it is full of people who dont have a clue and are very good at wasting other peoples money. Scottish enterprise is a failure.
24

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 30/05/2009 20:09:10
Scottish Enterprise is just another jobs for the boys quango. They get given a HUGE budget and achieve very little.

Mind you Scotland is a hard sell for industry as 4: pointed out Scotland is way too militant and unionised to be industry friendly - nobody in their right mind would set up a car plant or a ship builders in Scotland until that has been dealt with and the greedy corrupt unions crushed.

On top of all that Scotland has the 'sickest' workforce in Europe and the country has one of the highest 'disability' benefits claimants per capita any where in the world - which would hint a little bit at a a work shy attitude. - wouldn't you say?!

But underlying all of this is something even more sinister - Scotland hates a winner ! Anyone successful immediately gets attacked over earnings/property/possesions and time and again we elect politicians who purvey the politics of envy ..... As long as we think that way we are all losers ....
25

FTH22inarow,

30/05/2009 23:18:31
i TAKE IT IF HE QUITS HIS JOB HE WILL NOT RECIEVE A PENSION.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.