Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Sir Fred Goodwin offers to reduce his RBS pension

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 June 2009
ROYAL Bank of Scotland today said former boss Sir Fred Goodwin had volunteered a "substantial reduction" to his controversial pension.
Sir Fred's annual payout will fall from £555,000 to £342,500 a year, after his pension pot is cut by £4.7 million.

Despite leading the bank to the brink of disaster, his overall pension package was worth £703,000-a-year, but Sir Fred has already taken out a lump sum of £2.7 million.

Chancellor Alistair Darling said: "I'm very glad that RBS have now resolved the matter with Sir Fred Goodwin.

"I think that Sir Fred, in handing back part of his pension, is doing the right thing."

Mr Darling, who was speaking during a visit to Sheffield, said: "What I want to do now is to make sure that we rebuild RBS and all its banking operations, that's absolutely essential, not just for the bank but for the thousands and thousands of people who work for that bank and for the economy as a whole."

RBS is now more than 70%-owned by the taxpayer after being hammered by the financial crisis, and reported UK record losses in 2008. Tens of thousands of staff have been culled at the bank so far.

Sir Fred has gone to ground since the huge "rewards for failure" row over his pension erupted earlier this year and his house in Edinburgh has been vandalised.

The bank's chairman Sir Philip Hampton said: "On any measure this represents a very substantial reduction to Fred's pension and is an acceptable amount to all parties to the discussion.

"I am very pleased that we have resolved a situation that has been a difficult and unhappy one for all the parties involved, and it is to Fred's credit that he has done this on a voluntary basis."

He added that the row was distracting from the task of recovering the fortunes of the stricken bank.

"This pension arrangement became a symbolic issue, and the focus of unprecedented media and political attention.

"It had to be fixed to allow everyone to focus our energies where they should be, on getting the company back to health," Sir Philip said.

The chairman added that an internal inquiry into Sir Fred's pension, conduct, expenses and use of company assets had concluded recently "there was no conduct on Fred's part that would justify reducing the pension".

But the former boss – facing pariah status – approached the RBS board himself to look again at the pension issue.

Sir Fred caused public outcry when he initially refused to make any change to his pension payout, despite his role in the near-collapse of the banking giant.

RBS disastrously bought Dutch bank ABN Amro at the top of the market in 2007 before the credit crunch struck.

But trade union Unite dismissed news of the pension reduction as a "small gesture".

Rob MacGregor, Unite national officer, said: "For the diabolical failure by Fred Goodwin which led to the near collapse of RBS, this small gesture represents only a fraction of the massive pension that he is walking away with.

"Goodwin will still enjoy a very comfortable future at the expense of the taxpayer."

Sir Fred's offer marks a major climbdown after he denied as early as April that he was considering any voluntary reduction in his pension.

He previously maintained he had a contractual right to the pension and he expected the bank to fulfil its obligations.

In a letter to City Minister Lord Myners in February, he insisted that changes to the early retirement deal he negotiated when he was forced out in the autumn were "not warranted".

But the bank and the Treasury have been taking legal advice on whether they can claw back some of the payment.

Sir Fred agreed to give up a year's salary lump sum which he was due in lieu of notice, as well as certain share-related awards, when he agreed to retire early as the Government stepped in to rescue the beleaguered RBS.

But there was anger over news that the RBS board chose to effectively double the size of his pension pot from £8 million to £16 million.

If he had been dismissed rather than leaving on agreed terms, his pension would have been substantially less, calculated at an estimated £416,000 a year.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Hmm ...,

18/06/2009 11:31:52
... scarcely a penal cut in his pension. This man has clearly no shame and no sense of either decency or financial responsibility.

Does he think that this cut will turn around RBS? Or just blunt the public contempt for his ineptness and ego?
2

,

18/06/2009 11:40:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

18/06/2009 11:41:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

IainA,

Edinburgh 18/06/2009 11:47:36
Sir Fred has again misjudged the mood I think. Most people will be thinking "too little, too late"
5

Proghead,

Embra 18/06/2009 12:01:55
Methinks WeeBerty is on the wrong thread, unless there's some connection between Fred and Celtic I don't know about........
6

Proghead,

Embra 18/06/2009 12:02:47
......anyway, I'm sure Fred's gesture oes a long way to placate the RBS staff about to claim jobseekers....
7

Tartan Viking,

18/06/2009 12:49:56
It's a step in the right direction though.
8

Alistair Macintosh,

18/06/2009 12:59:50
Methinks WeeBery may have had a tipple or two, but his posts were none the less amusing.
9

Proghead,

Embra 18/06/2009 13:03:51
#7

True, but a few long steps off a short pier would be more welcome..........
10

JCA REID,

Annan 18/06/2009 13:12:58
So ....will these MP's e.g. Ex-speaker Martin, Devine et al be returning any of theirs????
11

JayJay,

Right here 18/06/2009 13:56:46
I suspect this is but a small gesture in advance of Goodwin landing yet another bumper pay package with another huge institution a la Hornby and Boots. What is it with these senior corporate figures - is there anything they can do that might with the disapproval of their peers?
Its of course heartwarming to see Darling and the rest of the establishment rallying round one of their own to applaud his very public spirited gesture. So, just to summarise, salary over the years north of £24m, pension payments of £10m plus should he live to 80 measured against tens of thousands of redundancies, £350bn underwrite of the bank's books and numerous business failures as a result of the bank's current hard line approach to business lending.
I am sure no-one in Government or indeed RBS has any appetite for any messy and public legal action to recoup all of the Goodwin money. We wouldn't want the abject failure of regulation externally and corporate governance internally to be aired in public now would we? And after all, a new "great guy" is in place sorting it all out and is earning yet another 7 figure salary with monsterous share options. Only this time, the boss man is being measured on cost cutting whilst being almost wholly underwritten by the taxpayer. Lessons have been learned indeed. Its high time the politicians got off their knees in front of these top city men.
12

IainA,

Edinburgh 18/06/2009 14:10:29
#11
"Its high time the politicians got off their knees in front of these top city men. "

That's not a pretty mental image.

Probably accurate though.
13

JayJay,

Right here 18/06/2009 14:41:14
#12
And I doubt Cameron's crew will be any better.
His top backers comprise a seedy alliance of off shore tax avoiders and hedge fund owners. You can't imagine he'll have much luck in getting off his knees either.
It sucks! These buffoons wreck the country, burden the rest of us with an angry tax bill, then scoop massive pay-offs and are presented in the press as "square guys" from paying back money they shouldn't have had in the first place. La-la land indeed.
14

Kate,

Zurich 18/06/2009 14:55:55
Well that really takes him near the breadline...not! It is a step in the right direction, but it is far too little far too late and an insult to those at RBS and related companies who have lost their jobs through the mismanagement displayed here.
15

Marga,

Edinburgh 18/06/2009 15:59:49
JJ - you're right - it didn't take long for Hornby to creep back, and he is being defended by the elite as one of their own.

Can't people affected (customers/shareholders) protest actively or passively - write emails, refuse to buy products, demonstrate? No good appealing to the better side of this elite, there isn't one, the only thing they understand is money.
16

Linda,

Edinburgh 18/06/2009 16:04:36
The publication of Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland 2007/08 highlighting Scotland's £2.3 billion three year surplus confirms Scotland's ability to prosper as an independent country and adds to the
case for full fiscal autonomy.

The three year surplus, in contrast to UK Government deficit over the same period puts pay to the claims of the Calman Commission on fiscal autonomy
and to Jim Murphuy's Scotland Office's contrived efforts to fiddle the figures.
17

Grumpy,

18/06/2009 16:31:27
Now we want Andy "HBOS Killer" Hornby to do the right thing - hand back your pension to all those HBOS employees and shareholders you left high and dry - many losing their jobs because their companies folded after they lost through their investment in HBOS, others who worked conscientiously for HBOS and have now been sacked by Lloyds TSB.
18

inkster,

18/06/2009 17:06:49
Well... to the righteous ones...

if you buy shares you are as greedy as Fred. Just stop funding their antics.

19

James.com,

18/06/2009 18:07:34
He should have taken the same cut as shareholders!
20

Oldhabits,

Bristol 18/06/2009 18:55:57
#20

Well said!! I just wish I had lost only 40% of my RBS shares. Does he think that his magnanimous offer will guarantee his safety when he returns to Scotland from Monaco? He should be stopped at the Airport and put in jail.
21

McMillar,

Fife 18/06/2009 20:00:50
Must be a new appointment in the wings.
22

Franny Goodwin,

OOT IN THE BACK 'O' BEYOND 18/06/2009 20:44:15
ARE WE RELATED SIR FRED, IF SO GEES SOME O YER DOSH LOL
23

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 18/06/2009 22:14:15
You have to laugh or you'd cry - "I think that Sir Fred, in handing back part of his pension, is doing the right thing." says Alistair Darling. "Pip, pip old chap you'll be back in the trough presently. Too bad we've been caught but don't worry as GB is working on the plan."

He'd be doing the right thing if he handed back 90% of his obscene pension payment and spent some time behind bars contemplating the wrongness of his actions at the bank. But no doubt Alistair's working on his own retirement plan, the necessity for which will be along quite soon.

24

Willie Mor,

18/06/2009 23:07:49
With an election coming up, and with Sir Fred being one of the Brown Boys, is it no surprise that Goodwin is now announcing that he will relinquish some of his obscene pension that we the taxpayer are paying for.

That's it Gordon, get the boy to say that he will now accept a £342k or £1k a day pension now that he has taken a £2.7m lump sum.

Know what, he should come back after fleeing the UK, because there a lot of people with ruined life savings who would like to talk to him.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.