Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Forth Ports warns docks plans will stall without injection of public cash

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2009
THE development of parts of Leith Docks faces significant delays unless the project wins public funding, the company behind the regeneration of the area warned today.
Forth Ports wants to push ahead with creating facilities for a ferry crossing between Fife and the Waterfront. It also wants to create a waterside walkway behind Ocean Terminal featuring shops and restaurants.

The company has now applied for funding from an innovative city council scheme in a bid to kick-start the infrastructure works, and it warns that, without the money, the plans would have to be halted.

Charles Hammond, chief executive of Forth Ports, said: "You wouldn't consider those types of works (in the current climate] if it wasn't publicly funded.

"A lot of work is going on and we're hopeful of a positive decision in the future."

The company wants to start the work on the cross-Forth ferry terminal even though no firm has yet come forward to commit to running the service.

Mr Hammond believes that finding an operator will be relatively straightforward, but only once the infrastructure works are completed.

"Essentially, we want a crossing between Fife and Ocean Terminal, then people could get off the ferry and on the tram and get into the centre of the city," he said. "It would be a very good sustainable transport measure.

" Stagecoach ran a trial last year, but at this stage we are just looking for the enabling infrastructure.

"You would hope and expect that if the route is viable an operator would be interested in linking between Fife and the Waterfront in Edinburgh."

Forth Ports has been under pressure as a result of the economic downturn, which has led to a huge writedown on the value of its land.

The city council recently said it would be willing to pump £50 million into the Waterfront area to kick-start development.

A "tax incremental financing" scheme, popular in the United States but untested in the UK, would see the council borrow the money against a projected increase in business rates from firms that are brought to the Waterfront as a result of the infrastructure work.

Forth Ports is now in talks about getting its hands on some of the funds that are available under director of city development Dave Anderson's scheme. He recently told the House of Commons all-party committee on urban development: "By seeking to raise only £50m from potential incremental tax flows of £311m, we believe this approach is prudent and workable."

Councillor Tom Buchanan, the city's economic development leader, said: "In the current economic climate it's very encouraging to see a developer looking at innovative funding options to ensure necessary infrastructure can be built.

"We are happy to be working with Forth Ports and the Scottish Government to continue to drive this major project forward."




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 June 2009 10:20 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Ports
 
1

PeterPete,

30/06/2009 11:57:26
The SNP govt only spends money on roads and new bridges, so no hope of getting anything towards a ferry from Fife to Edinburgh. The tiny amount of money that would cost in comparison to the new Forth Road bridge is microscopic, but would reap dividends. All it does it highlight the total lack of imagination of our so-called government. They are just in thrall to massive road building projects rather than an integrated public transport system.
2

Mallory,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 11:59:37
Let the Forth Ports raise their own cash. They don't share the profits too much.
3

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 30/06/2009 12:02:13
Does the public not fund enough,let forth ports get on with it.
4

Jaco Pastorius,

a/k/a Billy Effluvia 30/06/2009 12:42:31
And an oversized inflatable space-ark.
5

Logie Almond,

30/06/2009 13:01:32
What a brass neck. Why should the taxpayer support this private company who have been flogging of land for decades?
6

The Lone Haranguer,

30/06/2009 13:07:23
They will want their own taxpayer-funded tram line next.
7

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 30/06/2009 13:15:22
A ferry from Fife to Leith does any one really think that it would be a finacial success. Forth Ports probably used the same numpties who gave us the Business plan for the trams.
8

Incandescent,

30/06/2009 13:29:38
#9 It would if it connected at or near Dalgetty Bay, which is arguably the biggest Edinburgh dormitory village in Fife.
9

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 13:32:03
Edinburgh is facing a black hole of at least £92m over the next few years and yet the Council looks inclined to borrow £70m to bail out the Waterfront/PARC/EDI; £35m for its tram contribution; and now £50m for Forth Ports, of all things, at whose original behest we had to have a tram in the first place! Does the Council have a mandate to borrow for these, or any other, purposes?

I agree with above posters - let Forth Ports borrow their own funds.

I know it is not as exciting but perhaps councillors should just concentrate on minimising service cuts for the time being.
10

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 13:55:44
(12) - a very cunning plan indeed!

Serve it up in City of Edinburgh Council logo bowls (even gilded ones), and they couldn't have failed to resist.
11

jdships,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 14:14:16
2, 3 & 7
Spot on !!
FP's have broken virtually every promise they made ( mostly through Terry Smith) to help with the regeneration of Leith.
Only interested in their profit whithout thought for the local population
12

It's Leith for me!,

30/06/2009 14:18:01
if Forth Ports want access to any public money, they they must be nationalised first; with no compensation to the shareholders - they've made more than enough flogging off what was, and still should be, the aceas of very valuble publically owned land that was thrown in when the tories privatised it
13

Ron S,

Stockbridge 30/06/2009 14:49:28
#11 Sarah B Dead right, as usual.
Forth Ports market capitalisation is 43,272,609,924 (Yes forty three billion quid) and their shares are up 3p today. They own ports in Dundee and London Tilbury plus a lot of other assets including a large land bank. Now our town council wants to lend them fifty million pounds, on the off chance that they make a packet in the future. Is this right?



14

Ron S,

Stockbridge 30/06/2009 14:54:24
Sorry, they are only worth £430 million.
Same argument however.
15

Skip McClendon,

30/06/2009 15:26:14
So, in other words, Forth Ports are basically saying "give us a load of public cash for free, or else all the other public cash you have shovelled into the tramline to the waterfront is a complete waste".

What a surprise. The reality is revealved - Edinburgh Council will have to pay private companies to encourage them to build near the tramline. Quite different from the CEC/TIE fantasy where developers would be lining up to chuck millions of pounds at the Council to fund the tram white elephant.
16

colin syme,

East lothian 30/06/2009 16:34:52
Let the project go bust! l am sick to death of multi-million pound companies begging for handouts in the form of customised socialism. There are 27,000 people on the council housing waiting list, most of them living and working in Edinburgh unlike these businessmen who live and bank offshore. affordable housing should be the priority.
17

Gie's a break,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 18:47:27
I never know who's dafter, these idiots asking for more money when everyone is struggling to make ends meet or the public offices that go ahead and make these hand outs and expect nothing in return.

You really can't make this stuff up!
18

Toast,

30/06/2009 19:45:22
There is no money morons,never seen FPA sharing their profits,parasites that they are.
19

Dragonlord,

30/06/2009 19:52:00
Why do companies want public cash when they are struggling but never offer the public cash when they doing well? The public purse is already too far in debt so why make things worse just to help out Forth Ports?
20

No pay in Gorgie,

Wellington 30/06/2009 21:53:39
So the Hovercraft was a big success by all accounts, and yet now we are talking about having a ferry to do the route instead which will presumably have a longer journey time? Bravo geniuses!!

Most people have been on a ferry, less people will have been on a hovercraft, therefore there is no 'novelty' value and the ferry will have less day-trippers and this type of thing.

Still, it would be ok if there was actually anywhere worth going in Fife for a day out...alas, I can't think of any?
21

Ian down under,

Musselburgh 01/07/2009 04:41:52
Revolutionary idea. how about getting some ships to berth and load and unload cargo. Or am i too out of date in not realising that seaports are for strolling, cafes and wine bars.
Aberdeen Harbour is great, it is actually working and although Leith does not have the oil industry surely a lot of stuff that growls up the M6 and A1 in gas guzzling juggernauts could be coming in to Leith.
22

jock1,

01/07/2009 06:56:14
Give them the hole in the doughnought !!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.