Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


£25m lifeline for hill farmers in the wake of foot-and-mouth outbreak

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 October 2007
SCOTLAND'S farmers will receive £25 million to compensate for losses caused by foot-and-mouth and made worse by an "unsympathetic" attitude at Westminster, Richard Lochhead, the Holyrood environment secretary, said yesterday.
The outbreak of the disease in Surrey earlier this year came at the worst time for the industry in Scotland. Sheep could not be moved off the hills, leaving many at risk of starvation, and farmers could not transport animals to market.

Yesterday,
Mr Lochhead announced a £19 million scheme to support the breeding stock of ewes on top of £4.5 million already allocated for younger lambs that would otherwise have gone to market. An additional £1.3 million will go towards supporting the red meat sector and to charities supporting farmers.

The money will come from the Scottish Government's central budget. However, in the latest row with the UK government, Mr Lochhead said the "moral and financial" responsibility to compensate farmers lay with Westminster.

The source of the outbreak was traced to a government laboratory in Surrey.

He added John Swinney, the finance secretary, would be writing to the UK government to ask for the money back - including £8 million that was allegedly promised to Scotland then withdrawn.

Yesterday farming leaders said the package was just enough to keep farming alive, but was not compensation.

Opposition politicians said the package had come too late to help many farmers and accused the SNP of wasting time picking fights with Westminster.

Throughout the foot-and-mouth crisis, the Scottish Government has attacked Westminster for failing to act in time, first in lifting restrictions on transportation of animals and then in providing money for a welfare scheme for animals left on the hill.

This month Alex Salmond, the First Minister, accused Hilary Benn, the UK Environment Secretary, of withdrawing £8 million earmarked to compensate Scottish farmers, intended as an election bribe if the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, had called a snap poll. Mr Benn denies this.

"For our sheep sector in particular, this is a crisis of enormous proportion and we share the Scottish industry's view that the UK government has the financial and moral responsibility to reimburse our losses," Mr Lochhead said.

Jim McLaren, president of the National Farmers Union in Scotland, said foot-and-mouth was just the latest blow to the industry. He said the £25 million would only be a "lifeline" and it was a "bitter disappointment" that pig and dairy farmers would be excluded.

An agricultural census for Scotland released yesterday showed the lowest ever levels of sheep, pig and cattle stocks.

For the UK as a whole the sheep industry alone risks losing more than £500 million, according to estimates given to the House of Commons yesterday.

Mr McLaren pointed out: "A farmer with 1,000 breeding sheep will face losses in excess of £20,000. This aid package would put £6,000 into that business. That may bring some immediate relief, but it doesn't get close to addressing losses."

Sarah Boyack, Labour's agriculture spokeswoman in Scotland, said the compensation scheme had come too late for most hill farmers, and asked: "Why was the cabinet secretary prepared to leave farmers and crofters swinging in the wind as the SNP issued their customary 'it's all London's fault' speech?"



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 October 2007 8:28 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Foot and mouth
 
1

druidh,

25/10/2007 00:18:34

"Opposition politicians said the package had come too late to help many farmers and accused the SNP of wasting time picking fights with Westminster."

Bend over boys - you're about to be shafted by Westminster again!!

What is it that these failures cannot see that it's correct to stand up FOR Scotland??

2

the_figures_are _fudged,

25/10/2007 00:52:52

"Sarah Boyack, Labour's agriculture spokeswoman in Scotland, said the compensation scheme had come too late for most hill farmers, and asked: "Why was the cabinet secretary prepared to leave farmers and crofters swinging in the wind as the SNP issued their customary 'it's all London's fault' speech?"

Well done Sarah , I fail to see how your comments do anything to help even one single farmer, I bet Labour is proud of you.

Would be much more impressed if Sarah had actually lobbied her fellow labour members in favour of the Scottish farmers.

I should know better.

3

I'm no really here,

25/10/2007 01:05:48

I see the opposition at Holyrood are more interested in picking fights with the SNP instead of standing up for Scotland.

"...their customary 'it's all London's fault' speech?" Well, Sarah, this time they are at fault. Or do you take the Russian Revolutionary stand: "Labour? - We Never Make Mistakes".

4

eestlane,

25/10/2007 03:57:33

The Labour MSPs in the Scottish Parliament yesterday voted AGAINST the £25 million package. That will not be forgotten - although the North Brit of course failed to mention it.

5

An Beal Bacht,

Travelling in Nihlon 25/10/2007 04:40:29

Sarah Boyack, Labour's agriculture spokeswoman in Scotland, said "Why was the cabinet secretary prepared to leave farmers and crofters swinging in the wind as the SNP issued their customary 'it's all London's fault' speech?"

On the contrary Sadie, it is your lot who would drive Scottish farmers and crofters into bankrupcy to score a political point. Is this attitude symptomatic of a New Labour slash and burn policy for Scotland? Or is it simply a desire to finish a job well started?

6

Guga II,

Rockall 25/10/2007 06:29:00

Sarah Boyack, agricultural spokesman for the New Labour Numpty Party (Scottish Branch) says, the sky fell today, and it's all the fault of the SNP. It's got absolutely nothing to do with us or our political masters in Westminster, because they told us that was the case.

7

I'm no really here,

25/10/2007 06:33:19

After the election Fiasco report, Nigel Griffiths calls for the resignation of an SNP Minister for yet to be implemented policy - for which the budget is not yet approved.

Now Sarah Boyack complains about SNP delaying while it has been Federal Government delays in the whole affair - AND THEN LABOUR VOTE AGAINST THE PACKAGE.

8

,

25/10/2007 07:39:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1085584, Article id was mapped to record!
9

Organic peasant,

N E Scotland 25/10/2007 07:40:14

It was 100% a DEFRA sponsored F&M outbreak, from a DEFRA regulated lab, disease control is DEFRAs responsibility (DEFRA id cards carried by state vets in Scotland), in 2001 DEFRA (MAFF as was) paid F&M compensation. The Scottish government has had to act to try save a sheep sector punished for being in a country that voted in the "wrong" government. The money we will receive in our case will amount to about 20% of our losses, it is the bare minimum we need to survive and has already been spent on fuel and feed for winter.

10

Alastair the First,

25/10/2007 08:05:00

So the people responsible have refused to pay the bill. The UK government, having decided that it was necessary for electoral reasons to cough up, quickly changed their minds when the election was postponed. Then they refused to pay anything, trying to offload the burden on to the Scottish budget - in effect a further squeeze on that budget.

Along comes Richard Lochhead, an outstanding success in his post from what I have seen so far, who quickly puts together a rescue package - maybe not as much money as would be needed to offset the total effect but at least it keeps things ticking over, and all the Labour lot can do is carp from the sidelines - and to cap it all, having taken the line that the Scottish Government should pay, when that government DOES try to find the funds, Labour votes AGAINST it! You couldn't believe they could be so two-faced. It is clear that their intention is to ask "what are the SNP voting for" and then vote the opposite way in their usual confrontational manner. Everyone should write to their nearest Labour MSP (I know there aren't that many of them around these days) and demand why they have tried to destroy Scottish agriculture in this manner.

11

Alastair the First,

25/10/2007 08:08:08

...oh and another thing. Is it not time that for agricultural purposes, Scotland was treated as an independent country. Our livestock had restrictions imposed due to an outbreak 400 miles away, but livestock in countries closer to the outbreak wasn't affected. Another benefit of the "Union Dividend"? I can see the point if it had been an outbreak in Cumbria or even Lancashire, but Surrey?

12

Toast,

25/10/2007 08:20:50

Brown like his Blair before him loaths the countryside,labour is to busy trying to score cheap points and will face a massive backlash.

13

Kate,

Switzerland 25/10/2007 08:31:26

#12 and #13 Alaistair the First, good points well put, when are you going to stand for Holyrood?

Seriously, this should never have been up for discussion in the first place. The outbreak was in England, well over 400 miles from the Scottish farmers, English farmers are or will be compensated by Westminster.

No transport restrictions were put on animals coming from Belgium, Holland, France or Germany, all much closer to the outbreak than the uncompensated Scots farmers.

To cap it all the outbreak was traced back to a government run facility!

This is insult to injury to insult.

I am not totally for independence for Scotland, but this makes my blood boil as it is so blatantly hypocritical and small minded.

Good luck to the Scots farmers...

14

Loop,

25/10/2007 08:43:09

Those Labour scumbagas were the only lot to vote against the aid package. Keep that in mind as this crisis goes on.

ILondon Labour is alive and well in Hoyrood's bunch of mornonic, sell out Scotland haters.

15

malkster,

Scotland 25/10/2007 08:43:49

DEFRA are the worst run department in the Government. Both sides of the divide lost the chance to gain political capital out of this by paying out quickly. As to the movement restrictions thsi is due to the fact that we are seperated by the Sea from all other countries.

16

Liz,

25/10/2007 08:44:49

#13
The Scottish governement implemented the movement restrctions themselves. At the time the Defra website only showed restrictions in England (and maybe Wales - I am not sure) for Scotland they provided a link the the Scottish Executive/Government. The reality is that Surrey may be 400 miles away but as we saw with the 2001 outbreak F&M can move quickly (it had spread from Northumberland to Devon and Dumfries within weeks) and as there are no restrictions of movements between Scotland and England -alongside the two huge auction marts at Longtown and Carlisle which are used across the South of Scotland and North of England, there was probably no other decision for Scotland to make than to bring in the movement ban. Independent or not I would envisage the same decision to be made if it happens again.

If they hadnt and the disease had spread that would not have looked too good either.

17

Farmernot,

up tae ma shuchs in glaur 25/10/2007 10:38:48

Wendy is a bit quiet on this........probably trying to help Doogie out of his wee mess rather than adopt a proactive stance in this Brown run debacle......and as for Sarah Boyack.......last time she was on a farm it was to pick her own raspberrys !!!

18

Nurse,

25/10/2007 12:49:20

Did anyone see Gordon Browns claptrap today about Britishness, rule Britannia, Land of hope and glory crap, it was truly inspired, he still cannot stand the fact Scotland is now run by the SNP Govt, he stands for a working class constituency and belts out this realy pathetic patriotic psycobable about Britishness, please have the guts to call an election Gordon, I personaly have always voted labour but from now on SNP gets my vote at every election, so far they have stood up for Scotland, ie our farmers, trident and the lack of leadership in Scottish labour, good work Alex Salmond!!!!!

19

stonepark,

25/10/2007 13:35:20

Sorting out compensation is simple....


1)English Government body released disease into environment therefore it is not a natural occurrence and therefore they can be sued through the courts for costs to others. So if they don't hand over the money nicely - take them to court

20

Judge&Jury,

Glasgow 25/10/2007 13:57:17

2 - Sarah Boyack

Who used to have the Environment portfolio and couldn't care less than to make political gain while farmers suffered.

DEFRA - control cattle movements across the UK- they hold the compensation budget.

For them not to release central funds to the rest of the UK's Farmers and only to English Farmers could bring a charge Discrimination and Inequality - and this from a Government department!

Vote for the SNP in the next General Election, because the sooner we separate ourselves from the cesspit called Westminster with its morally bankrupt politicians the better.

Independent Scotland - Free to choose what we want and get on with doing it.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.