Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


European Parliament urges Equitable Life compensation

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
12 April 2007
EQUITABLE Life policy ho lders are entitled to a compensation scheme set up by the UK government, according to a draft report unveiled yesterday by a European Parliament (EP) committee of inquiry.
The report stated the UK government is "under an obligation to assume responsibility" for victims of the Equitable Life "debacle".

But the European Union (EU) assembly has no power to offer compensation or force the British government to pay up.


The report also argued that EU law and policy making must be overhauled to prevent such cases in future and to encourage the development of a healthy European pensions and insurance market.

The EP inquiry was set up in January 2006 in response to petitions received by parliament from policy holders who were among the victims of the financial crisis at the Equitable Life Assurance Society (ELAS).

In the mid-1990s, the world's oldest insurance company ran into difficulties.

Its near demise came in December 2000 when the House of Lords overturned its decision to cut final payouts on some policies.

The company had to set aside £1.5 billion to cover the liability and closed its doors to new business in 2001. Its activities came under scrutiny and a number of reports on the crisis have been published.

But around one million British policy holders are still facing financial loss and are seeking compensation.

At the discussion yesterday in the EP, the UK regulatory system - including the Financial Services Authority, the Treasury and the Department of Trade and Industry - was severely criticised for "excessive leniency".

During the debate, British Conservative and Liberal members clashed with Labour.

Labour MEP Peter Skinner said the report did not recognise new EU rules put in place to protect consumers. He said: "If Solvency II had been in place, there probably would not have been an Equitable Life [crisis]."

Sharon Bowles, a Liberal member of the committee, said: "I am not 100 per cent confident at this stage that Solvency II ticks all the boxes."

And Conservative Neil Parish accused Skinner of complacency and employing "spoiling tactics".

Yesterday's draft report has to be put to the vote by the committee on 8 May.

The Treasury oversaw Equitable at one point and a separate Parliamentary Ombudsman's final report is due in the summer, with powers to order compensation.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 April 2007 8:48 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Equitable Life
 
1

Toots - Sheila,

Canada 12/04/2007 01:59:45

It is Solvency 11 that has "caused" all of the "endowment mortgage shortfalls"!!!! And basically it is illegal for the EU or a Member State to interfere in "home ownership"!!!! This has clearly happened in relation to endowment mortgage policyholders.

Basically this EU Policy stated that insurers had to have large "cash reserves". How did the company get these reserves? Easy they sold all of the consumer securities investments and put these into the company's bottom line. (No doubt this stupid policy was a "knee jerk" reaction to the Equitable Life scenario that has caused millions of UK endowment mortage policyholders to be debt-ridden for life!!!!)

Was this in the interest of clients. NO. Is it in the "public interest" to have millions of consumers in debt for life but the financial institutions are rolling in OUR cash? That would be OUR savings for our retirement!!!!! WHERE is the "public interest"?

Our investments have "upped" the bottom line of companies and the executives are giving themselves bigger bonuses!!! We've all had to re-finance mortages "creating new business" and more bonuses!!!! CORRUPT - not half!

The EU Commission and the UK Treasury / FSA need to "come clean" on this one and they need to provide compensation as per the EU Requirements. That is as per our contracts and based on market value. (My investment contracts were to be earning for 25 and a further 25 years if I so desired!) Not the current "sham" that is currently in place and whereby consumers are getting a "fraction" of their losses. Mis-selling is NOT the issue. Consumers are being MIS-LED by the governments as to HOW these "shortfalls" arose in the first place - through their dumb policy!!!!!!!

The EU needs to invoke the law. That is it needs to temporarily "cease business" until the finance industry provides rest

2

mikexxxxnolan,

Eire 12/04/2007 10:06:03

The European Parliament and the UK Parliament have details of a problem with 2 Equitable Life Directors. The
problems amount to negligence in checking there are no legal problems with those appointed and that they have a reasonable grasp of the legal system. Especially with complying with court orders. They have been omitted from the Draft Report and earlier reports. There is not a valid ground for refusing compensation and not being wholy informative can be deemed a cover-up.

3

GrahamL,

12/04/2007 11:08:56

#1 I'm not going to comment on your rant - but I feel I should point out that The Equitable Life issue is nothing at all to do with endowment mortgages...

4

Vicar,

Cardiff 12/04/2007 19:24:37

The Equitable Life issue has everything to do with failed endowment mortgages, as it has everything to do with failed final salary schemes, as it has everything to do with failed money purchase schemes. It also has everything to do with very poor annuity rates.
The link is poor mathematics at the Treasury since 1969 and still existing.
The actuaries failed to spot the mistakes and are now trying to hide behind 'the longevity problem'.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.