Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


HBOS takeover 'is a done deal' after vote

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 November 2008
THE takeover of HBOS by Lloyds TSB is looking like a "done deal", according to analysts.
Speculation has been mounting in recent weeks about whether shareholders of both banks would back a deal that would almost inevitably lead to a huge wave of job cuts in Edinburgh and across the UK.

But the extent of approval by Lloyds TSB shareholders at a general meeting in Glasgow has convinced analysts that the deal will go ahead.

A resounding 96 per cent of Lloyds investors voted in favour of the takeover, despite vocal opposition from a number of private shareholders during the two-and-a-half hour meeting. For the takeover to go through, it now only needs to pass one further hurdle – the vote by HBOS shareholders at its general meeting on December 12.

Leigh Goodwin, an analyst at brokers Fox-Pitt Kelton, said: "It looks like a done deal. A lot of Lloyds shareholders are also HBOS shareholders and this increases the likelihood that HBOS shareholders will vote in favour."

Only 75 per cent of HBOS shareholders need to approve the deal for it to go ahead – and the vast majority of institutional shareholders, which make up about three quarters of investors in HBOS, are thought to be in favour.

If the merger goes ahead, it would create a banking giant with 145,000 staff and 3000 branches across the UK.

Chairman Sir Victor Blank confirmed that the Bank of Scotland brand would remain after the takeover, and the registered office of the new Lloyds Banking Group would be in Scotland.

Following the vote in favour of the deal, Sir Victor said: "This is overwhelming endorsement for the logic of the transaction."

Shane O'Riordain, a spokesman for HBOS, added: "We welcome the overwhelming vote in favour of our recommended merger.

"This is another very important milestone for our deal."

The route to the merger has also been eased by the failure of other parties to come up with an alternative proposal.

Intelligent Finance founder Jim Spowart had said that an international company was interested in joining the bidding for HBOS. But he admitted earlier this month that the interest had ended.

Scottish bankers Sir Peter Burt and Sir George Mathewson have campaigned to keep HBOS independent and were aiming to raise £500m which they said that, added to the £11.5bn Government bail-out, would be enough to allow the company to survive.

But they appear to have now conceded defeat after Chancellor Alistair Darling said earlier this week that there was no "automatic right of access" to Government funds.

Sir Peter said: "We are looking at it but we are not optimistic. We're starting to pull up the tent pegs but not the tent yet."

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Ghengis McCann,

Edinburgh 20/11/2008 13:03:11
The shareholders have spoken. And "GIRUY, Alex Salmond" is what they have said.
2

BIG EYE,

Paisley 20/11/2008 23:08:20
Substitute Alex Salmond for Scotland and poster number 1 is absolutely correct!
3

kandaharkenny,

rosyth 21/11/2008 11:28:45
When you see the effort made by Halifax employees in Halifax, ie producing a glossy report in conjunction with management ,unions ,Local Mps and chamber of commerce on why jobs should be saved their, it beggars belief that we tried to go down the 'snp 'route .

Mathewson ,Burt and Salmond have probably cost more jobs than was originally planned .

It wass to paraphrase 'unpardonable folly'

4

SkeptikScot,

21/11/2008 19:00:12
It's a done deal, hail a taxi for Sir Fred ("Airport!") and let's move on. Now I know the ending I'm sick of this story.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.