Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Government accused of breaking the rules in wind farm inquiry

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 May 2009
THE Scottish Government has been accused of acting illegally in its dealings over a highly controversial wind farm.
Local councils in the Borders believe rules have been broken because government officials have been in discussion with the Ministry of Defence about the wind farm "in secret".

The Ministry of Defence opposed plans for the 48-turbine Fallago Rig
wind farm in the Lammermuir Hills during a public inquiry to decide whether the application should be approved. It was worried the turbines could interfere with radar signals.

However, it has come to light that since the public inquiry finished 15 months ago, the planning consents team at the Scottish Government has been in discussions with the MoD and the applicant.

This has led to claims that the Scottish Government was trying to influence the result of the inquiry so that the wind farm could go ahead.

The Scottish Government has denied any wrongdoing and there has not yet been a decision on the proposal.

In a letter to energy minister Jim Mather, Dave Lochead, chairman of Cranshaws, Ellemford and Longformacus Community Council, said: "We are extremely concerned about the abuse of inquiry procedure by the government to apparently achieve an outcome to suit its policy objectives in this area."

He added: "It appears that the government is willing to over-ride the proper planning procedure in support of their wind energy policy objective in the case of the Fallago Rig application."

The Scottish Government has insisted it was adhering to the rules in the Town and Council Planning Rules 1997 when it communicated with the MoD.

However, Scottish Borders Council senior solicitor Nuala McKinlay said in the letter: "I have taken the opportunity to review the 1997 rules and struggle to find within those rules any legal explanation or justification for events that have taken place since the inquiry closed."

And Morag Ferguson, corporate legal adviser at East Lothian Council, criticised the government's behaviour, that had allowed parties to "submit additional information in private without any other party, nor, indeed, members of the public, having an opportunity to hear this new 'evidence'."

Mark Rowley, vice-chairman of Cranshaws, Ellemford and Longformacus Community Council, added: "How can we trust ministers to make fair and impartial decisions when they operate in secret?

"This is an exceptionally contentious wind farm proposal in an area increasingly blighted with wind farms."

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We have acted entirely within the rules.

"Ministers wrote to Defence Estates and North British Windpower Ltd in October 2008 offering them an opportunity to supply further information which was now available, with regard to a possible mitigation of impacts that the Fallago Rig wind farm development may have on the Brizlee Wood radar. We understand that both parties have held discussions in relation to this request, although neither party has yet responded.

"Should there be any new evidence that ministers need to consider in relation to the determination of the wind farm application, then, in line with inquiry rules, we will write to the applicant, the planning authority and all parties offering them opportunity to comment."





Page 1 of 1

 
1

The Online Scot,

Scotland 07/05/2009 22:18:03
"THE Scottish Government has been accused of acting illegally ....yadah, yadah, yadah !!"

Anyone notice that the Scottish government are always being 'accused', yet nothing ever comes of these accusations?

2

Benarty,

Fife 08/05/2009 09:45:49
Resite or adapt a radar signal station site to develop a windfarm to ensure Scotland can meet it CO2 emissions target and have sufficient renewables to power homes, schools, hospitals and industry?

I think the government would be irresponsible not to discuss this with the MOD. And I don't suppose it will be the only site thus affected, given the similarity between what radfar needs and what turbines need.
3

El Franko,

08/05/2009 09:52:29
It is not possible to have a windfarm without wrong-doing. You have to mislead about the economics, since the unvarnished truth would see any windfarm laughed away without trace. You have to mislead about environmental impact, since there is nothing good about these destroyers of tranquillity and resources. Add to this the CO2-lies which have driven the government into legislative silliness and a need for such windfarms, then you also need to mislead about the science and climate. No ethical-fund manager worth his or her salt would touch windfarm companies with a bargepole.
4

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 08/05/2009 10:09:13
Perhaps the MOD should be putting money into R&D on betetr radar systems then since the world will soon be covered in these turbines (and other energy harnessing devices that could effect radar).
5

Tartan Viking,

08/05/2009 13:49:42
I quickly read the headline as 'Government accused of breaking the wind....'

Probably a more accurate headline....
6

Whauped,

Borders 08/05/2009 19:32:24
The Kerrs of Cessford, "a notorious reiving family", would be proud that the Duke of Roxburghe is keeping up family traditions.

Plugging 48,000 cubic metres (or more) of concrete and steel reinforcement into peat moorland and topping it out with structures bigger than a Boeing 747 jumbo jet (hubs of 65 and 80m plus 90m diameter blades), will be the final touch in the industrialisation of the Lammermuirs.

These hills have been designated as an area of 'Great Landscape Value' in Scottish Borders Council's Structure Plan and are supposed to be of "special intrinsic value" to society.

Its custodians don't seem to care. They have joined the pack of capetbaggers who know all about 'sweating assets' and very little about community, landscape and values.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.